¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ / v.25, no.3, 2011³â, pp.421-431
¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿ø ÄÉÀ̺íÄ« ¼³Ä¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Å½¹æ°´ÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä ¹× ŵµ
( Visitors' Perceptions and Attitudes about Establishing a Cable Car in Mudeungsan Provincial Park )
±è»ó¿À; Àü³²´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ ÀÓÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀÚ¿¬°ø¿øÀÇ ÇϳªÀÎ ¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿ø ³» ÄÉÀ̺íÄ« ¼³Ä¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Å½¹æ°´ÀÇ ÀÎ½Ä ¹× ŵµ¸¦ ÀÌÇØÇϰíÀÚ ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. 2010³âµµ 9¿ù Áß ¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿ø¿¡¼­ ½Ç½ÃµÈ ÇöÁö¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇØ µ¥ÀÌÅÍ ¼öÁýÀÌ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ³À¸¸ç, ÃÑ 401¸íÀÇÁ¶»ç´ë»óÀÚ°¡ º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇØ ÀÌ¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú¿¡ µû¸£¸é, ÃÑ ÀÀ´äÀÚÀÇ 61.7%°¡ ¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿ø ³» ÄÉÀ̺íÄ« ¼³Ä¡¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© '¹Ý´ë' Àǻ縦 Ç¥¸íÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç 'Âù¼º' Àǻ縦 ³ªÅ¸³½ ÀÀ´äÀÚ´Â 20.6%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÄÉÀ̺íÄ« ¼³Ä¡·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© '»ýÅÂȯ°æ ¹× ÀÚ¿¬°æ°ü ÈѼÕ', '´Ã¾î³­ ¹æ¹®°´¼ö·Î ÀÎÇÑ È¥Àâ¹®Á¦', '¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿øÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬¼º ¹× ÀÚ¿¬°æÇèÀÇ ¼Ò¸êÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÒ °ÍÀ̶ó´Â °Í¿¡ ³ôÀº µ¿ÀǸ¦ º¸ÀÎ ¹Ý¸é, '°ü±¤°´ À¯Ä¡·Î ÀÎÇÑ °æÁ¦¼Òµæ Áõ´ë ¹× Áö¿ª°æÁ¦ ¼ºÀå¿¡ ±àÁ¤Àû ¿µÇâ'¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â ³·Àº µ¿ÀǸ¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ÃÑ ÀÀ´äÀÚÀÇ 32.4%°¡ ÇöÀç ¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿øÀ» 'ÀÚ¿¬º¸Á¸Áö¿ª'À¸·Î º¸¾ÒÀ¸¸ç 10.5%´Â '°³¹ß°ø¿øÁö¿ª'À̶ó°í ÀÀ´äÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹Ý¸é, ÃÑ ÀÀ´äÀÚÀÇ 48.8%´Â ¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿øÀÌ 'ÀÚ¿¬º¸Á¸Áö¿ª'À¸·Î °ü¸®µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í ÀÀ´äÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ´ÜÁö 2.5%¸¸ÀÌ '°³¹ß°ø¿øÁö¿ª'À¸·Î °ü¸®µÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í ´äº¯ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àα¸»çȸÇÐÀû Ư¼º(¼ºº°, ¿¬·É, Çз¼öÁØ, ±¤Áֽà °ÅÁֱⰣ), ÀÌ¿ëÇàÅÂ(¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿ø ¹× ¹«µî»êµµ¸³°ø¿ø ³» ÁߺÀÀÏ´ëÁö¿ªÀÇ ¹æ¹®°æÇè)¹× Àå¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±Ô¹üÀÌ ÄÉÀ̺íÄ« ¼³Ä¡¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÁöÁöµµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸î °¡Áö½Ã»çÁ¡À» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
This study examined visitors' perceptions and attitudes about establishing cable car in Mudeungsan Provincial Park (MPP). Data were collected from 401 respondents by a field questionnaire survey in MPP during the September of 2010. 61.7% of respondents opposed to establishing cable car in MPP while 20.6 percent supported it. Respondents showed high level of belief to possible consequences that establishing cable car will result in 'deterioration of ecosystem and natural landscape', 'crowding problem by increased number of visitors', 'disappearance of naturalness or previous nature experiences in MPP'. Respondents, however, presented low belief to 'positive effects on increasing economic income and local economic growth by attracting tourists'. 32.4 percent of the survey respondents evaluated the present MPP as a place of 'Nature Preservation Area (NPA)' and 10.5% as 'Developed Park Area (DPA)'. 48.8% of respondents answered that MPP should be managed as 'NPA' with only 2.5% as DPA. Respondents' socio-demographic characteristics (i.e., gender, age, education level, length of residence in Gwang-ju city), use patterns (number of visits to MPP or to Jungbong and surrounding areas), and normative place condition of MPP showed relationship with the overall support rates about establishing cable car. The results and their implications were discussed.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÀÚ¿¬°ø¿ø;»ýÅÂȯ°æ;ÀÚ¿¬°æ°ü;ÀÚ¿¬°æÇè;Áö¿ª°æÁ¦;ECOSYSTEM;NATURAL LANDSCAPE;NATURE EXPERIENCES;LOCAL ECONOMY;
 
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸÁö / v.25, no.3, 2011³â, pp.421-431
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-3857
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201125247229451)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿