¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.10, no.3, 2008³â, pp.69-77
°èÃþºÐ¼®¹ý(AHP)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ º¸ÇàÀÚ ¼­ºñ½º Áú ¿µÇâÀÎÀÚ ºÐ¼®
( An Analysis of Influencing Factors to Pedestrian Quality of Service by Utilizing Analytic Hierarchy Process )
±èÅÂÈ£;ÁøÀå¿ø;¹è±â¸ñ; ÇѾç´ëÇб³ »ê¾÷°úÇבּ¸¼Ò;ÃæÁÖ´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇкÎ;´ëÁø´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º¸ÇàÀÚ À̵¿±Ç È®º¸¸¦ À§ÇØ °¡Àå ¸ÕÀú ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ®¾ß ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ º¸ÇàÀÚ À̵¿°ø°£¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤È®ÇÑ Æò°¡¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ¿¬±¸´Â º¸ÇàÀÚÀÇ À̵¿°ø°£¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥ °³¹ßÀ» ½ÃµµÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÚ·áÁ¶»ç ¹× ºÐ¼®¹æ¹ýÀº Àü¹®°¡ ¼³¹®°ú °èÃþºÐ¼® ¹ý(AHP)À» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àü¹®°¡ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¿Í °èÃþºÐ¼® ¹ý(AHP)À» Ȱ¿ëÇÏ¿© º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Á¤¼ºÀûÀÎ º¯¼ö¸¦ °í·ÁÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¾ÈÀ» ¸ð»öÇϸç, º¸ÇàÀÚ ¼­ºñ½º Ư¼ºÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÏ¿© º¯È­µÈ º¸Çàȯ°æ¿¡ ¼øÀÀÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â »õ·Î¿î º¸ÇàÀÚ ¼­ºñ½º¼öÁØ Æò°¡ÁöÇ¥¸¦ °³¹ßÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú¸¦ »ìÆìº¸¸é, »ó¾÷ ¹× ¾÷¹«Áö¿ªÀÇ °æ¿ì º¸Çà±³Åë·ù(Á¤·®: ¾à 52%), º¸µµ±âÇϱ¸Á¶(Á¤·®: ¾à 16%), º¸µµÀÌ¿ëÇàÅÂ(Á¤¼º: ¾à 11%)¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª º¸Çà±³Åë·ù¿Í º¸µµ±âÇϱ¸Á¶¿Í °°Àº Á¤·®ÀûÀÎ Ç׸ñÀÇ Áß¿äÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÁÖ°ÅÁö¿ªÀÇ °æ¿ì º¸Çà±³Åë·ù(Á¤·®: ¾à 30%), º¸µµ±âÇϱ¸Á¶(Á¤·®: ¾à 22%), º¸µµÀÌ¿ëÇàÅÂ(Á¤¼º: ¾à 20%)°¡ °¢°¢ 1, 2, 3¼øÀ§·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇöÀç Àû¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â º¸ÇàÀÚ ¼­ºñ½º¼öÁØ Æò°¡ ¿µÇâÀÎÀÚ Áß Á¤·®ÀûÀÎ ÁöÇ¥°¡ Áß¿äÇϳª, º¸ÇàÀÚµéÀÇ ÀÌ¿ëÇàÅÂ¿Í °°Àº ÁúÀûÀÎ Ãø¸é°ú °°Àº Á¤¼ºÀûÀÎ Ç׸ñÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
This article proposes new method for estimating pedestrian quality of service(QOS) that is useful to changing pedestrian environment by examining pedestrian quality of service as well as developing new method that integrate qualitative variables into the estimating indicators for the pedestrian movement right. Based on survey questionnaire addressed to experts group, the obtained data for the indicators were analyzed through Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). The results show that pedestrian traffic flow(quantitative figure: 52%), sidewalk geometric(quantitative figure: 16%), sidewalk usage behavior(qualitative figure: 11%) in commercial and business zone pointed out the importance of quantitative indicators such as pedestrian traffic flow, and sidewalk geometric. In addition, the results also show that pedestrian traffic flow(quantitative figure: 30%), sidewalk geometric(quantitative figure : 22%), sidewalk usage behavior(qualitative figure: 20%) indicate the significance of qualitative indicators such as pedestrian's sidewalk usage.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼­ºñ½º Áú;º¸ÇàÀÚ;°èÃþºÐ¼®¹ý(AHP);quality of service(QOS);pedestrian;analytic hierarchy process(AHP);
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.10, no.3, 2008³â, pp.69-77
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200807653005879)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿