|
|
|
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.12, no.1, 2010³â, pp.79-86
|
ÇöÀå »ó¿Â Àç»ý ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® Æ÷ÀåÀ» À§ÇÑ °íÁ¡Âø À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°°ú Æûµå ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°ÀÇ ¹ÝÀÀƯ¼º ºñ±³
( Comparing Laboratory Responses of Engineered Emulsified Asphalt and Foamed Asphalt Mixtures for Cold In-place Recycling Pavement ) |
| ±è¿ëÁÖ;ÀÌÈ£½Å; ;;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ®¿Í Æûµå ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ®¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ ÇöÀå »ó¿Â Àç»ý ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® Æ÷ÀåÀº ³ëÈÄÇÑ ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® Æ÷ÀåÀ» Àç»ýÇϴµ¥ °¡Àå °æÁ¦ÀûÀ̸ç ģȯ°æÀûÀÎ ÀçȰ¿ë °ø¹ýÀÌ´Ù. ÃÖ±Ù, ÇöÀå »ó¿Â Àç»ý ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°ÀÇ ÄÚÆÃ, ¶óº§¸µ, ÀÜ·ù¾ÈÁ¤µµ, ¾ç»ýÁ¶°ÇÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃÄÑÁÖ´Â °íÁ¡Âø À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ®°¡ °³¹ßµÇ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ÇöÀå »ó¿Â Àç»ý ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® Æ÷ÀåÀ» À§ÇÑ °íÁ¡Âø À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°°ú Æûµå ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°ÀÇ ½Ç³»½ÃÇè¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀƯ¼ºÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. °íÁ¡Âø À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°Àº Æûµå ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ÀçȰ¿ë °ñÀ縦 ±ÕÀÏÇÏ°Ô ÄÚÆÃ½ÃÄÑÁÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î À°¾È °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÇöÀå »ó¿Â Àç»ý ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® Æ÷ÀåÀ» À§ÇÑ °íÁ¡Âø À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°°ú Æûµå ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°ÀÇ ¸¶¼£¾ÈÁ¤µµ¿Í °£Á¢ÀÎÀå°µµ´Â À¯»çÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ¾ú´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ Áø°øÀ¸·Î Æ÷ÈµÈ ½ÀÀ±»óÅÂÀÇ °íÁ¡Âø À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°ÀÇ ¸¶¼£¾ÈÁ¤µµ¿Í °£Á¢ÀÎÀå°µµ´Â Æûµå ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°º¸´Ù ¿ì¼öÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 4½Ã°£ ¾ç»ý ÈÄ °íÁ¡Âø À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°ÀÇ ¶óº§¸µ Çö»óÀº Æûµå ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°º¸´Ù Àû°Ô ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ½Ç³»½ÃÇè¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹ÝÀÀƯ¼ºÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ÇöÀå »ó¿Â Àç»ý ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® Æ÷ÀåÀ» À§ÇÑ °íÁ¡Âø À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°Àº Æûµå ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°º¸´Ù ¿ì¼öÇÑ ÀúÇ×¼º°ú ¶óº§¸µ ÀúÇ×¼ºÀ» ¹ßÈÖÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
| Cold in-place recycling (CIR) using emulsified asphalt or foamed asphalt has become a more common practice in rehabilitating the existing asphalt pavement due to its cost effectiveness and the conservation of paving materials. As CIR continues to evolve, the engineered emulsified asphalt was developed to improve the field performances such as coating, raveling, retained stability value and curing time. The main objective of this research is to compare the laboratory responses of the engineered emulsified asphalt (CIR-EE) mixtures against the foamed asphalt (CIR-foam) mixtures using the reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP)materials collected from the CIR project on U.S. 20 Highway in Iowa. Based on the visual observation of laboratory specimens, the engineered emulsified asphalt coated the RAP materials better than the foamed asphalt because the foamed asphalt is to create a mastic mixture structure rather than coating RAP materials. Given the same compaction effort, CIR-EE specimens exhibited lesser density than CIR-foam specimens. Both Marshall stability and indirect tensile strength of CIR-EE specimens were about same as those of CIR-foam specimens. However, Marshall stability and indirect tensile strength of the vacuum-saturated wet specimens of CIR-EE mixtures were higher than those of CIR-foam mixtures. After four hours of curing in the room temperature, the CIR-EE specimens showed less raveling than the CIR-foam specimens. On the basis of test results, it can be concluded that the CIR-EE mixtures is less susceptible to moisture and more raveling resistant than CIR-foam mixtures. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ÇöÀå »ó¿Â Àç»ý ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ®;°íÁ¡Âø À¯È ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ®;Æûµå ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ®;cold in-place recycling;engineered emulsified asphalt;foamed asphalt; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.12, no.1, 2010³â, pp.79-86
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201023064631105)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|