¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.12, no.1, 2010³â, pp.21-27
È­¹°ÀÚµ¿Â÷ ¿îÀüÀÚÀÇ ¿îÇà½Ã°£¿¡ µû¸¥ »ç°íÀ§Çèµµ ºÐ¼®
( Analysis of Motor Carrier Crash Risk with Driver Hours of Service )
¹Ú»ó¿ì; Çѱ¹±³Å뿬±¸¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
´ëÇü È­¹°ÀÚµ¿Â÷ÀÇ »ç°í´Â ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ »ç°í¿Í ´Þ¸® ½É°¢ÇÑ ÀθíÇÇÇØ µîÀ» µ¿¹ÝÇÒ È®·üÀÌ ³ô´Ù. Àå°Å¸® ¿îÇàÀÌ ¸¹Àº È­¹°ÀÚµ¿Â÷ ¿îÀüƯ¡À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ¿îÀüÀÚÀÇ ÇÇ·Î ¹× ÇǷηΠÀÎÇÑ »ç°í°¡ ³ô´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÇÇ·Î¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ »ç°í¸¦ °¨¼Ò½Ã۱â À§Çؼ­ ¿Ü±¹¿¡¼­´Â ¿îÀüÀÚÀÇ ÇǷο¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´Â Á߿亯¼öÀÎ ¿îÀü½Ã°£, ¼ö¸é½Ã°£, ¿îÇàÇüÅ µîÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ¿îÀüÀÚÀÇ ¿îÇà½Ã°£(Hour-of-Service:HOS)À» ¹ýÀ¸·Î ±ÔÁ¤Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ¿î¼Û¾÷ü ¶ÇÇÑ ¿îÀüÀÚµéÀÇ »ç°í¸¦ °¨¼Ò½Ã۱â À§ÇØ ¹ýÁ¤ ¿îÀüÀÚ ±Ù¹«½Ã°£ Áؼö¸¦ À§ÇØ ³ë·ÂÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó´Â È­¹°ÀÚµ¿Â÷ ¿îÀüÀÚÀÇ ÇÇ·Î¿Í °ü·Ã »ç°íÀ²À» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±âÃÊÀûÀÎ ¹ýÁ¤ ¿îÀüÀÚ ¿îÇà½Ã°£ Á¶Â÷ Á¦½ÃµÇÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó È­¹°ÀÚµ¿Â÷ »ç°í»ç¸ÁÀÚ¼ö¸¦ °¨¼Ò½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿îÀüÀÚÀÇ ±Ù·Î±âÁعý Á¦Á¤ Çʿ伺À» Á¦½ÃÇϴµ¥ ¸ñÀûÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. À̸¦ À§Çؼ­ ÇöÀç ¿î¿µ ÁßÀÎ ¼±Áø¿Ü±¹ÀÇ È­¹°ÀÚµ¿Â÷ ¿îÀüÀÚ ¿îÀü½Ã°£ ¹× ¿îÇà±ÔÁ¤À» »ìÆìº¸°í ½ÇÁõÀû ÀڷḦ ÅëÇØ ¿îÀü½Ã°£¿¡ µû¸¥ »ç°í À§ÇèµµÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ »ìÆìº¸¾Ò´Ù. ½ÇÁõÀû ÀÚ·á´Â ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ È­¹°ÀÚµ¿Â÷ 3°÷ÀÇ »ç°í ÀÚ·á 231¸íÀÇ ¿îÇàÀÏÁö¿Í »ç°í°¡ ³ªÁö ¾ÊÀº ÀÚ·á 462¸íÀÇ ¿îÇàÀÏÁö¸¦ ¼öÁý, ÃÑ 693¸í ¿îÀüÀÚÀÇ ¿îÇàÀÏÁö¸¦ ¼öÁýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿îÀüÀÚÀÇ ¿¬¼ÓµÈ ¿îÇà¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æ¯Â¡À» ¹Ý¿µÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï time-dependent ·ÎÁö½ºÆ½ ȸ±Í¸ðÇüÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á¤©°ú ¿îÇà½Ã°£ 1½Ã°£ºÎÅÍ 3½Ã°£±îÁö ¿îÀüÇÑ ¿îÀüÀÚ »ç°íÀ§Çèµµ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿îÇà½Ã°£ÀÌ 10½Ã°£ÀÎ ¿îÀüÀÚ´Â ¿îÇà½Ã°£ 1½Ã°£ÀÎ ¿îÀüÀÚº¸´Ù »ç°íÀ§Çèµµ°¡ ¾à 2.2¹è ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. °á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î ¿îÇà½Ã°£ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï »ç°íÀ§Çèµµ ¶ÇÇÑ Áõ°¡ÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ Áö¿ªÀû Ư¼º°ú ¿îÀüÀÚ Æ¯¼º¿¡ ¸Â´Â ¿îÀüÀÚ ¿îÀü½Ã°£ ¼³Á¤À» À§ÇÑ ¿¬±¸¹æÇâ ¹× ÇâÈÄ ¿¬±¸°úÁ¦¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¿¬±ÞÇÏ¿´´Ù.
Management of driver hours of service (HOS) for commercial vehicle operators has been a continual safety challenge. One of the more critical issues to government and motor carriers is fatigue and fatigue-related accidents. To reduce truck drivers¡¯fatigue-related accident risk in other countries, the government issued the HOS regulations. However, korea government does not have any HOS regulations. The objective of this research gives the clues that korea should have the HOS regulation to reduce truck drivers¡¯fatigue-related accident risk. This study examines the HOS regulation over other countries and conducts relative accident risk analysis using the real data from 3 freight companies. The data set includes 231 accident involved drivers and 462 non-accident drivers. Therefore, the size of the total data set is 693 drivers. One of the most important aspects of early studies of safety and HOS was the need to characterize continuous driving by using the notion of "survival". Subsequent research used a data replication scheme and logistic regression to capture the survival effect. This study uses time-dependent logistic regression. The test of significance between parameters indicates that the first three hours are almost the same risk. In the 10th hour of driving, the risk was more than 2.2times that in the baseline first hour. In conclusion, as driving time goes on, the crash risk increases.
 
Ű¿öµå
È­¹°ÀÚµ¿Â÷;¿îÇà½Ã°£;»ç°íÀ§Çèµµ;·ÎÁö½ºÆ½ ȸ±ÍºÐ¼®;¿îÀüÀÚ ÇÇ·Î;±Ù·Î±âÁعý;freight;driving hours;crash risk;logistic regression;driver fatigue;hours of service;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.12, no.1, 2010³â, pp.21-27
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201023064631077)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿