¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.12, no.2, 2010³â, pp.33-41
¿¬°á·ÎÀÇ »ç¿ëÀÚ ºñ¿ë°ú °ø»çºñ °è·®È­¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ÀÔü±³Â÷·Î ÃÖÀûÇü½Ä ¼±Á¤ ±â¹ý
( The Selection of Optimal Interchange Types by Quantifying the User Costs and Construction Costs of Ramps )
±è»ó¿±;ÃÖÀ缺;¹Î°æÂù;ÃÖÇöÈ£; ¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ±³Åë°øÇаú;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ±³Åë°øÇаú;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ±³Åë°øÇаú;Çѱ¹µµ·Î°ø»ç ±â¼ú½É»çó;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÇöÀç ½Ç¹«¿¡¼­ ÀÔü±³Â÷·Î À¯ÇüÀ» °áÁ¤Çϱâ À§Çؼ­´Â ÇØ´ç µµ·ÎÀÇ °èȹ ±³Åë·®, ÁöÇü, °ø»çºñ, ÁÖº¯ ÀÔü±³Â÷·Î¿ÍÀÇ °£°Ý µîÀ» ±Ù°Å·Î ÇØ¼­ °áÁ¤Çϰí ÀÖÁö¸¸, ¹®Á¦´Â °°Àº ÀÔ·ÂÁ¶°ÇÀ» °®°íµµ ¼³°èÀÚÀÇ ÁÖ°üÀû ÆÇ´ÜÀ̳ª ¹ßÁֺμ­ÀÇ ¿ä±¸ »çÇ× µî¿¡ µû¶ó ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ À¯ÇüÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â µµ·Î ÀÔü±³Â÷·Î À¯ÇüÀ» °´°üÀûÀ¸·Î °áÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ÀÔ·ÂÁ¶°ÇÀÌ °°´Ù¸é Ç×»ó ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ À¯ÇüÀ» ã¾Æ³»´Â À¯Çü ¼±Á¤ ¾Ë°í¸®ÁòÀ» °³¹ßÇß´Ù. ÀÌ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ±âÁ¸ ±¹³»¿¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â ÀÔü±³Â÷·ÎÀÇ Çü½ÄÀ» Á¶»çÇß°í, ±× °á°ú, Á¤ÇüÈ­µÈ ±âº»Çü½Ä 10°³¸¦ ¼±Á¤Çß´Ù. ±× ÈÄ °¢ Çü½ÄÀ» ¿¬°á·ÎÀÇ ÇüŸ¦ °í·ÁÇÏ¿© Ç¥½ÃÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇß´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °¢ ÀÔü±³Â÷·Îº°·Î µµ·Î »ç¿ëÀÚ ºñ¿ë°ú ÀÔü±³Â÷·Î °ø»çºñ¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ÆíÀͰú ºñ¿ëÀ» ±¸Ã¼È­ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇß´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ Á¦½ÃÇÑ ÀÔü±³Â÷·Î À¯Çü ¼±Á¤ ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀº Àϰü¼º ÀÖ°Ô ÀÔü±³Â÷·Î Çü½ÄÀ» °áÁ¤ÇØ ÁÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú°í, ÀÌ °á°ú´Â ÇâÈÄ µµ·Î ¼³°è ½Ç¹«ÀÚµéÀÌ ÀÔü±³Â÷·Î Çü½ÄÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ´Â °úÁ¤¿¡ Å« µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
It is stated in the highway geometric design guide that expressway interchange types should be selected considering a set of input variables including travel demand, topography, construction cost and interchange spacing. However, this selection method has a problem of providing different interchange types even for the same input variables depending upon different applications of engineers discretion. A procedure that produces consistent results is necessary and this paper presents the development of an efficient and reliable procedure based on the quantification of road user costs and construction costs on interchanges. To develop this procedure, a survey of existing expressway interchange types in South Korea was made and 10 basic interchange types and 52 supplementary interchange types were identified. To relate road user costs and construction costs to these interchange types, this research uses two method. First, interchange types were expressed by a set of ramp configurations. Second, road user benefits and construction costs associated with these different interchange types were formulated based on the current national guide of the expressway economical analysis. As a result, it was proved that an interchange type to provide minimum costs could be selected consistently and this research result should be useful for future expressway geometric designs.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÀÔü±³Â÷·Î Çü½Ä;¿¬°á·Î ºñ¿ë;ºñ¿ë °è·®È­;»ç¿ëÀÚ ºñ¿ë;°ø»çºñ;optimal interchange types;ramp configurations;quantification;road user cost;construction costs;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.12, no.2, 2010³â, pp.33-41
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201023064629238)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿