¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.12, no.2, 2010³â, pp.99-106
Falling Weight Deflectormeter¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû Ư¼º ºÐ¼®
( Structural assessment of Anti-Freezing Layer with use of Falling Weight Deflectormeter Deflection )
À̹®¼·;±èºÎÀÏ;Àü¼ºÀÏ;¹ÚÈñ¹®; Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø µµ·Î¿¬±¸½Ç;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø µµ·Î¿¬±¸½Ç;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø µµ·Î¿¬±¸½Ç;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø µµ·Î¿¬±¸½Ç;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
µµ·Î´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àç·á¿Í ´Ü¸éÀ¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÈ ±¸Á¶¹°À̱⠶§¹®¿¡ °èÀýÀû ¹× Àç·á ¹°¼ºÆ¯¼º »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Æ÷Àåü °¢ ÃþÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû ÀûÁ¤¼º ¶Ç´Â ÁöÁö·Â Á¤µµ¸¦ ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹«¾ùº¸´Ù Áß¿äÇÏ´Ù. ÇöÀç, ±âÁ¸ µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþ ¼³°è¹ý¿¡ µû¸£¸é, µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀº Æ÷ÀåüÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû ÀûÁ¤¼º°ú´Â ¹«°üÇÏ°Ô ¿ÂµµÁ¶°Ç¿¡ µû¸¥ µ¿°á±íÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ÀÏ·üÀûÀ¸·Î °áÁ¤µÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ µ¿°á±íÀ̸¦ Æ÷À屸Á¶¼³°è¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÏ´Ù º¸´Ï Æ÷Àå ¼³°èÀÇ ºÎ½Ç ³»Áö´Â °ú´Ù¼³°èÀÇ ¿ì·Á°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ º» ³í¹®Àº 2m ÀÌÇÏ Àú¼ºÅäºÎ, ÀýÅäºÎ ¹× Àý¼º°æ°èºÎ µîÀ» ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© Æ÷Àå ÇϺÎÃþ¿¡¼­ µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀÇ ±¸Á¶Àû ¿ªÇÒÀ» ±Ô¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Falling Weight Deflectormeter(FWD) ½ÃÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àü±¹ 10°³ ÇöÀå¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© º¸Á¶±âÃþ¸é¿¡¼­ FWD ½ÃÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢°¢ÀÇ ´Ü¸éÀº µ¿¹æ¹æÁöÃþÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ±¸°£°ú ¾ø´Â ±¸°£À¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̹ø ÇöÀå ½ÇÇèÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ¾ø´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ ºñÇØ óÁü·®ÀÌ ÀÛ°Ô ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾î µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀÌ Æ÷Àåü¿¡¼­ ±¸Á¶Àû ¿ªÇÒÀ» ´ã´çÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» È®ÀÎ ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÀýÅäºÎ¿¡¼­ µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ óÁü·® °ªÀÌ ¾à 15~55% Á¤µµ °¨¼ÒÇϸç, Àý¼º°æ°èºÎ¿¡¼­ µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡ óÁü·® °ªÀÌ ¾à 11~64%, Àú¼ºÅäºÎÀÇ °æ¿ì ¾à 2~38%Á¤µµ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. SCI¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀÇ µÎ²²°¡ Àüü Æ÷ÀåüÀÇ ±¸Á¶ÀûÀÎ ´É·Â¿¡ ¾à 24% Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇǷμö¸íÀº µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀÌ ÀÖ´Â ±¸°£ÀÌ ¾ø´Â ±¸°£¿¡ ºñÇØ ¾à 2¹è ³ôÀº °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿© ÇǷαտ­ ÀúÇ×¼ºÀ» ÁõÁø½ÃŰ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̰ÍÀº µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþÀÌ Æ÷Àåü¿¡¼­ ±¸Á¶ÀûÀÎ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÑ´Ù´Â ÀǹÌÀÌ´Ù.
Until now, the thickness design of anti-freezing layer has been empirically conducted using the frost depth determined from the freezing index. This approach cannot consider the structural properties of anti-freezing layer, which can cause the over-design of pavement structure. This paper presents results of structural evaluation of anti-freezing layer using the Falling Weight Deflectormeter (FWD) deflections. The FWD testing was directly conducted on top of the subbase layer located at the embankment, cutting, and boundary area of each section. It is observed from this testing that the center deflections of pavement structure with anti-freezing layer are smaller than those without anti-freezing layer. The deflection reduction rates are 15~55% in the embankment, 11~64% in the cutting, and 2~38% in the boundary, respectively. It was also found that the use of antifree zing layer enables to reduce the Surface Curvature Index (SCI) values up to 24 percent. Fatigue lives show that pavement structure with antifreezing layer are about two times higher than the those without anti-freezing layer. This fact indicates that the anti-freezing layer should be considered as a structural layer in the asphalt pavement system.
 
Ű¿öµå
µ¿»ó¹æÁöÃþ;óÁü·®;anti-freezing;FWD;deflection;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.12, no.2, 2010³â, pp.99-106
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201023064629253)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿