¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.10, no.4, 2008³â, pp.65-77
µµ½ÃºÎ °£¼±µµ·Î ¿îÀüÀÚÀÇ Àνļ­ºñ½º¼öÁØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µÇâ¿äÀκм®
( An Analysis of influencing factors to perceived LOS of Drivers in Urban Arterial )
±èÅÂÈ£;ÀÌ¿ëÅÃ;°íÁØÈ£; Çѱ¹µµ·Î°ø»ç µµ·Î±³Å뿬±¸¿ø ±³Å뿬±¸ÆÀ;´ëÇѹα¹ °¨»ç¿ø;¼­¿ï½ÃÁ¤°³¹ß¿¬±¸¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ºñµð¿À¿µ»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °£Á¢¼³¹®Á¶»ç¹æ½ÄÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© µµ½ÃºÎ °£¼±µµ·ÎÀÇ ¿îÀüÀÚµéÀÌ ÁÖÇà ½Ã ´À³¢´Â Àνļ­ºñ½º¼öÁذú µµ·Î¿ë·®Æí¶÷(KHCM)¿¡ ÀÇÇØ »êÁ¤µÈ ½ÇÁ¦¼­ºñ½º¼öÁذ£ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ È®ÀÎÇϰí, ¿îÀüÀÚ°¡ ÀνÄÇÏ´Â ¼­ºñ½º¼öÁØ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÁÖ¿ä¿äÀÎÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇϸé, ù°, ½ÇÁ¦¼­ºñ½º¼öÁذú Àνļ­ºñ½º¼öÁذ£ÀÇ Àνķü Â÷À̸¦ °ËÁõÇÑ °á°ú, ½ÅÈ£±³Â÷·Î±¸°£ÀÇ °æ¿ì 40.8%, Mid-block±¸°£ÀÇ °æ¿ì 59.2%°¡ µÎ ¼­ºñ½º¼öÁØÀ» µ¿ÀÏÇÏ°Ô ÀνÄÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ µÎ ¼­ºñ½º¼öÁذ£ÀÇ µ¿Áú¼º °ËÁ¤(FÅë°è°ËÁ¤, tÅë°è°ËÁ¤)°á°ú¿¡¼­µµ µÎ ¼­ºñ½º¼öÁØ °£ÀÇ Â÷À̰¡ ¶Ñ·ÇÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µÑ°, ½ÅÈ£±³Â÷·Î±¸°£¿¡¼­ Àνļ­ºñ½º¼öÁØ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ±³Åë·ù(26.4%), ½ÅÈ£¿î¿µ(23.1%), ±âÇϱ¸Á¶(18.1%), ÀÌ¿ëÇàÅÂ(15.9%) µµ·Î°æ°ü(10.0%), À¯Áö°ü¸®(4.4%), ±³ÅëÁ¤º¸(2.2%) ¿äÀÎÀ» ¼ø¼­´ë·Î °í·ÁÇÏ¿© °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌÁß ±³Åë·ù µî »óÀ§ 3°³ ¿äÀÎÀÌ Á¤·®Àû ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î 67%¸¦, ÀÌ¿ëÇàÅÂ, µµ·Î°æ°ü¿äÀΰú °°Àº Á¤¼ºÀû ¿äÀÎÀÌ 26%¸¦ Á¡À¯Çϰí ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼Â°, Mid-block±¸°£¿¡¼­ Àνļ­ºñ½º¼öÁØ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ±âÇϱ¸Á¶(25.3%), °æ°ü(20.0%), ½ÅÈ£¿î¿µ(19.2%), ±³Åë·ù(15.3%), ÀÌ¿ëÇàÅÂ(9.7%), À¯Áö°ü¸®(6.4%) ±³ÅëÁ¤º¸(4.2%)¼øÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ƯÈ÷ ÀÌÁß¿¡¼­ Á¤¼ºÀû ¿äÀο¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â µµ·Î°æ°üÀÌ ½ÅÈ£±³Â÷·Î±¸°£ 10.6%º¸´Ù ³ôÀº 20.0%·Î ¸¹Àº ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÇâÈÄ ¼­ºñ½º¼öÁØ »êÁ¤À» À§ÇÑ ºÐ¼® ½Ã¿¡´Â ¿îÀüÀÚ°¡ ½ÇÁúÀûÀ¸·Î ÀνÄÇÏ´Â Á¤¼ºÀûÀÎ ¿äÀÎ (ÀÌ¿ëÇàÅÂ, µµ·Î°æ°ü µî)À» °í·ÁÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
LOS(Level of Service) concept are popularly used in many countries as the MOEs to evaluate the road construction and operation plans. However, MOEs such as travel time and delay only measure quantitative factors describing traffic flow, although qualitative factors such as scenic, comfort and reliable factors are very important for roadway drivers to define the LOS. Therefore, this paper are focusing on verifying the difference between perceived LOS and LOS in KHCM, and proving qualitative factors affecting Drivers' Perceived LOS in Urban Arterial. As a result, following outputs are obtained; (1) verifying the difference between perceived LOS(PLOS) and LOS in KHCM (2) proving that qualitative factors such as scenic and driver behavior factors affects PLOS (3) suggesting that qualitative factors should be considered in MOEs of LOS
 
Ű¿öµå
µµ·Î¿îÀüÀÚ;¼­ºñ½º¼öÁØ;Àνļ­ºñ½º¼öÁØ;Á¤¼ºÀû ¿äÀÎ;roadway drivers;level of service(LOS);perceived level of service(PLOS);qualitative factor;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.10, no.4, 2008³â, pp.65-77
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200806135607924)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿