|
|
|
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.10, no.4, 2008³â, pp.103-116
|
½Ç³» ¹× ÇöÀå½ÇÇ踦 ÅëÇÑ DCPTÀÇ ³ë»óÅä ´ÙÁü°ü¸®±âÁØ Á¤¸³¿¡ °üÇÑ ±âÃÊ¿¬±¸
( Fundamental Study on Establishing the Subgrade Compaction Control Criteria of DCPT with Laboratory Test and In-situ Tests ) |
| ÃÖÁؼº; Àδö´ëÇÐ °Ç¼³È¯°æ¼³°è°ú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ½Ã°ø½Ã ÇöÀå´ÙÁü°ü¸®¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ´ÜÀ§Áß·®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¹æ¹ý ´ë½Å ź¼º°è¼ö¿Í °°Àº ¿ªÇÐÀû Ư¼ºÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Â »õ·Î¿î ´ÙÁü°ü¸®±âÁØ Á¤¸³À» À§ÇÑ ÇöÀå½ÃÇè¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÇè¹ýÀÌ °£ÆíÇϸç, Ȱ¿ë¼ºÀÌ Áõ°¡Çϰí ÀÖ´Â µ¿ÀûÄܰüÀÔ½ÃÇèÀÎ DCPT ÃøÁ¤½ÃÇèÀÌ ³ë»óÅäÀÇ ´ÙÁüǰÁú°ü¸®ÀÇ Àû¿ëÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑÁö¸¦ °ËÅäÇÏ¿´´Ù. DCPT ½ÃÇè¹æ¹ýÀÌ ÇöÀå¿¡¼ ´ÙÁüÈÄ ¼³°èź¼º°è¼ö¸¦ ÃßÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ È®ÀÎÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½Ç³»ÅäÁ¶½ÃÇè, ÇöÀå½ÃÇèÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´°í, ³ë»óÃþÀÇ DCPT, CBR, ȸº¹Åº¼º°è¼ö°£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ¹®ÇåÁ¶»ç ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© DCPT ½ÃÇè°£°ÝÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ç³»½ÃÇè°á°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, DCPT °üÀÔÄ¡ (PR) °ª°ú CBR°ª °£ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è½Ä¿¡¼´Â Livneh ½ÄÀÌ °¡Àå ºÎÇÕµÊÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, DCPT ½ÃÇèÀ» ÅëÇÑ PR°ªÀ» ±¹³»¿Ü ź¼º°è¼ö ÃßÁ¤½ÄÀ» Æò°¡ÇÑ °á°ú, ¿¹Ãø $M_R$ ź¼º°è¼ö °ª°ú ºÎÇÕÇÏ´Â Á¦¾È½ÄÀ¸·Î´Â George¿Í PradeshÀÇ ½ÄÀÌ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, FWD¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ $M_R$ Á¦¾È½ÄÀ» ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú, CudishalaÀÇ Á¦¾È»èÀº ¿¹Ãø $M_R$ °ªº¸´Ù ´Ù¼Ò Å©°Ô »êÁ¤µÇ¸ç, ChenÀÇ Á¦¾È½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì ´Ù¼Ò ÀÛÀº °ªÀ» º¸À̰í, °Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿øÀÇ Á¦¾È½ÄÀº ¿¹Ãø $M_R$°ª¿¡ °ú¼Ò Æò°¡ÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ½ÇÁ¦ Â÷·®ÀÌ À¯¹ßÇÏ´Â ÁÖÇà¼Óµµ¿¡ µû¸¥ ÃàÂ÷ÀÀ·Â°ú ±¸¼ÓÀÀ·ÂÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ½Ç³» $M_R$ ½ÃÇè°á°ú¸¦ ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, °Ç±â¿ø Á¦¾È½ÄÀÌ °¡Àå ÀûÇÕÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. DCPT ÇöÀå½ÃÇè°á°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, °üÀÔÁöÁ¡ÀÇ ÀÔµµºÐÆ÷¿¡ µû¶ó PR °ª¿¡ ¿ÀÂ÷°¡ »ý±æ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, ¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ °¨¼ÒÇϱâ À§ÇÑ DCPT ½ÃÇè°£°Ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ãßõ°ªÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇöÀå½ÃÇè°á°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú ÇöÀå ´ÙÁüµµ¸¦ ¸¸Á·ÇÏ´Â ³ë»óÀ̶ó ÇÏ¿©µµ ³ë»ó Àç·á¿¡ µû¶ó Æò±Õ PR °ªÀÌ ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ƯÈ÷ ÀÔ°æÀÌ Å« Àç·áÀϼö·Ï Æò±Õ PR °ªÀÌ ÀÛÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, ÇöÀåÇÔ¼öºñÀÇ °æ¿ì ´ÙÁüµµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀº »ó´çÈ÷ Å©³ª, DCPT ½ÃÇè¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ ÇöÀåÇÔ¼öºñ º¯È´Â Æò±ÕPR°ª¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀÌ ¹Ì¹ÌÇÔÀ» ¾Ë¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. |
|
| In this study, in-situ testing method, Dynamic Cone Penetration Test(DCPT) was presented to establish a new compaction control criteria with using mechanical property like elastic modulus instead of unit weight for field compaction control. Soil chamber tests and in-situ tests were carried out to confirm DCPT tests can predict the designed elastic modulus after field compaction, and correlation analysis among the DCPT, CBR and resilient modulus of sub grade were performed. Also, DCPT test spacing criteria in the construction site was proposed from the literature review. In the result of laboratory tests, Livneh's equation was the best in correlation between PR of DCPT and CBR, George and Pradesh's equation was the best in the predicted resilient modulus. In the resilient modulus using FWD, Gudishala's equation estimates little larger than predicted resilient modulus and Chen's equation estimates little smaller. And KICT's equation estimates the modulus smaller than predicted resilient modulus. But using the results of laboratory resilient modulus tests considering the deviatoric and confining stress from the moving vehicle, the KICT's equation was the best. In the results of In-situ DCPT tests, the variation of PR can occur according to size distribution of penetrate points. So DCPT test spacing was proposed to reduce the difference of PR. Also it was shows that average PR was different according to subgrade materials although the subgrade was satisfied the degree of compaction. Especially large sized materials show smaller PR, and it is also found that field water contents have influence a lot of degree of compaction but a little on the average PR of the DCPT tests. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| µ¿ÀûÄܰüÀÔ½ÃÇè;°üÀÔÄ¡;ÅäÁ¶½ÃÇè;ÇöÀå½ÃÇè;ȸº¹Åº¼º°è¼ö;dynamic cone penetration test(DCPT);PR;soil chamber tests and in-situ tests;CBR;resilient modulus of subgrad; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.10, no.4, 2008³â, pp.103-116
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200806135607933)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|