¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.11, no.1, 2009³â, pp.85-94
µµ·ÎÆ÷Àå ¹× À¯Áö°ø»ç Ç¥ÁØÇ°¼À °³Á¤ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on the Standard of Cost Estimation in the Construction of Pavement and Maintenance )
Á¤´ë±Ç;Å¿ëÈ£;¾È¹æ·ü;Á¶À±È£; Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ ÀϹݴëÇпø Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ÄÚ½ºÆ®¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;Çѱ¹°Ç¼³±â¼ú¿¬±¸¿ø ÄÚ½ºÆ®¿¬±¸¼¾ÅÍ;Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ °Ç¼³È¯°æ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
½ÇÀû°ø»çºñ Àû»ê¹æ½ÄÀº ǰ¼À°ßÀû, ½ÇÃø°ßÀû, ´Ü°¡°ßÀû, ¹× ÃѾװßÀû µî ¸Å¿ì ´Ù¾çÇÏ´Ù. Ç¥ÁØÇ°¼ÀÀº °ø°ø±â°ü ¹× ¹Î°£±â°üÀÇ °ø»çºñ Ã¥Á¤±âÁØÀÌ µÇ´Â ÀÚ·áÀÌ´Ù. º» ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â µµ·Î°ø»ç¿¡ ÀÌ¿ëµÇ´Â ±âÁ¸ ǰ¼À°ßÀûÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡À» °³¼±Çϱâ À§ÇØ ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ°í ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ±× °á°ú·Î °¢ °øÁ¾¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÇÃø°ßÀû ¹æ¹ýÀ» Åë°èÀû ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÅëÇØ Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ±âÁ¸ ǰ¼À°ú ½ÇÃøÇ°¼ÀÀ» °ø»ç´ÜÀ§ÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ ÅëÇØ Á¦¾ÈµÈ ǰ¼ÀÀÌ º¸´Ù °£´ÜÇÑ °ßÀû ÀÛ¼ºÀ» °¡´ÉÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ°í º¸´Ù Çö½ÇÀûÀÎ °ø»ç±Ý¾×À» »êÃâÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â º¸Á¶±âÃþÀÇ Case-Study¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© °¢ ¹æ½Äº° Àå´ÜÁ¡À» °¡½ÃÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ±³ÇØ º¸¾Ò´Ù. ½ÇÃøÇ°¼ÀÀ¸·Î Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´À» °æ¿ì, °è»ê°úÁ¤Àº ±âÁ¸Ç°¼ÀÀÇ 50%·Î Ãà¼ÒµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç 1ÀÏ 1Àåºñ »ç¿ëÀ¸·Î ±âÁ¸ÀÇ 1ÀϹ̸¸ Àåºñ »ç¿ë¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÆíÂ÷°¡ º¸¿ÏµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Ç°¼À¸¸À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °øÁ¤ÀÇ ½Ã°ø³»¿ëÀ» ÁüÀÛÇϰí À̸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î °øÁ¤°èȹÀ̳ª ÀηÂÅõÀÔ°èȹ µîÀ» ¼ö¸³ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
In cost estimation of construction, several methods including quantity-per-unit costing, job costing, unit cost estimation and lumpsum estimation are being utilized in Korea. Among them, a Quantity-per-unit Costing Method is used as a standard of cost estimation in public and private works. This paper presents the realistic job-costing method on all road construction tasks through statistical analyses with field survey data to solve the problems induced by the existing quantity-per-unit costing method. Furthermore, it was found that the newly developed job costing method is able to produce a simple costing procedure and a more actual construction cost estimation by a case study, which was performed to compare particular construction costs produced by two different methods, existing quantity-per-unit costing and newly developed job costing. These methods is compared by Case-study about sub-base. In the case of Job costing method, the estimate is shorter than the other case about 50% and can make up for the weak point about instrument in the current Standard of cost estimation. And it can be depict by Job Costing method about progress of work for using by a plan about construction management.
 
Ű¿öµå
Ç¥ÁØÇ°¼À;ÀÛ¾÷Á¶;µµ·ÎÆ÷Àå;½ÇÃøÀû»ê;standard of cost estimation;quantity-per-unit costing;crew;pavement;job costing;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.11, no.1, 2009³â, pp.85-94
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200911850421593)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿