|
|
|
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.8, no.4, 2006³â, pp.1-11
|
±¹µµÀ¯ÃâºÎ ¾ÈÀüÁø´ÜÀ» À§ÇÑ ½Ã¼±À¯µµ½Ã¼³ÀÇ À¯Çüº° ±â´É°ËÅä
( A Study on Function of the Delineation System by Pattern for Safety Audit on Road Exit Ramp ) |
| ±Ý±âÁ¤;±èÈ«»ó;¹Î°æÅÂ;¾ç°è½Â; ¸íÁö´ëÇб³ ±³Åë°øÇаú;¸íÁö´ëÇб³ ±³Åë°øÇаú;¸íÁö´ëÇб³ ±³Åë°øÇаú;¸íÁö´ëÇб³ ±³Åë´ëÇпø;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ÇöÀç ±¹µµ°³·®»ç¾÷À¸·Î ±¹µµÀÇ À̵¿¼ºÀÌ Çâ»óµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª À¯ÃâºÎ¿¡ ¼³Ä¡µÈ µµ·Î¾ÈÀü½Ã¼³ÀÎ ½Ã¼±À¯µµ½Ã¼³Àº Àϰü¼º ¾øÀÌ ¼³Ä¡µÇ°Å³ª ¹Ì¼³Ä¡µÈ °æ¿ì°¡ ¸¹´Ù. À¯ÃâºÎÀÇ ½Ã¼±À¯µµ½Ã¼³Àº À¯ÃâºÎÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÌ´Â ½Ã¼³ÀÓ¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í °¢ À¯ÃâºÎ¸¶´Ù ¼·Î ´Ù¸¥ À¯ÇüÀ¸·Î ¼³Ä¡µÇ¾î ±× ±â´ÉÀû °ËÅä°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ÇöÀåÁ¶»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© Á¶»çµÈ ½Ã¼³À¯Çüº°·Î ¼³Ä¡±âÁØÀÇ ÀûÇÕ¼ºÀ» °ËÅäÇÑ ÈÄ ¿îÀüÀÚ ÀÎÁöƯ¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÑ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ½Ã¼³À¯ÇüÀ» Á¦½ÃÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© 3D-½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀ» °³¹ßÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù °´°üÀûÀÎ ºñ±³½ÇÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ã¼³À¯Çü °£ ºñ±³º¯¼ö´Â ¿îÀüÀÚ ÀÎÁöƯ¼ºÀ» ´ëº¯ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇöÀú¼º, ½ÃÀμºÀ¸·Î ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© ½Ã¼³À¯Çü¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¢°¢ÀÇ Æ¯¼º½ÇÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀÎÁö Ư¼ºº¯¼ö·Î äÅÃµÈ ½ÃÀμºÀÇ ½ÇÇè¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÇ ½ÇÇèÀÚÀÇ ÃøÁ¤¿ÀÂ÷¸¦ ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇÏ¿© ÃÊÁ¡±â·Ï°è(Eye Marker Recorder)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇèÇÔÀ¸·Î¼ º¸´Ù Á¤·®ÀûÀ̰í, °´°üÀûÀÎ Áֽú󵵸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. °¢°¢ÀÇ ÃøÁ¤ º¯¼öµé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Ã¼³À¯Çü °£ À¯ÀǼºÀ» °ËÁõÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ºÐ»ê ºÐ¼®À¸·Î °ËÅäÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú ÇöÀú¼ºÀº ½Ã¼³À¯Çü °£ À¯ÀǹÌÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³ÂÀ¸¸ç, À¯ÃâºÎ¸¦ ÀÎÁöÇϴµ¥ ¾ÈÀüÇ¥Áö, Àå¾Ö¹°Ç¥ÀûÇ¥Áö, ½Ã¼±À¯µµµî, ½Ã¼±À¯µµºÀÀÌ ¼³Ä¡µÈ ½Ã¼³À¯ÇüÀÌ °¡Àå À¯¸®ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ½ÃÀμºÀÇ È¿°úôµµ·Î Áֽú󵵸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú ½Ã¼³À¯Çü °£ À¯ÀǹÌÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÇöÀú¼º°ú µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ½Ã¼³À¯ÇüÀÌ ¼³Ä¡µÇ¾úÀ» ¶§ À¯ÃâºÎ¸¦ ÀÎÁöÇϴµ¥ À¯¸®ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ÀüüÀûÀÎ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© º¼ ¶§ ¾ÈÀüÇ¥Áö, Àå¾Ö¹°Ç¥ÀûÇ¥Áö, ½Ã¼±À¯µµµî, ½Ã¼±À¯µµºÀÀÇ ½Ã¼³ÀÌ °¡Àå À¯¸®ÇÑ °ÍÀÓÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª(p=0.44), ¿ª·ù¼º ½Äµµ¿°Àº °æºÎ ¹®ÇÕ 26¸í Áß 3¸í(12%)¿¡¼¸¸ ¹ß°ßµÇ¾î ÈäºÎ ¹®ÇÕ±º(52%)¿¡ ºñÇØ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(p<0.01). °á·Ð: ½Äµµ-À§ ¹®ÇÕ ½Ã °æºÎ ¹®ÇÕÀº ÈäºÎ ¹®ÇÕ¿¡ ºñÇØ ¹®ÇպΠÇùÂøÀÇ ºóµµ´Â Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø°í, ¿ª·ù¼º ½Äµµ¿°ÀÇ ºóµµ´Â ÇöÀúÈ÷ ÀûÀ¸¸ç, ½Äµµ¾ÏÀÇ °æ¿ì ´õ ¿©À¯ ÀÖ´Â ÀýÁ¦¸éÀ» Á¦°øÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀåÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸®¶ó ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ½ÄµµÀýÁ¦¼ú ¹× À§-½Äµµ ¹®ÇÕ ½Ã Ưº°ÇÑ ±Ý±âÁõ¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù¸é °æºÎ ¹®ÇÕÀ» ¼±È£ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ¹®ÇÕ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ª·ù¼º ½Äµµ¿°°ú ÇùÂøÀÇ ºóµµ¿¡¼´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ ¹ß°ßÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, ¼ö¼ú ½Ã°£ÀÇ ´ÜÃà µîÀÇ ¸î¸î ÀåÁ¡À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ ±â°è ¹®ÇÕÀ» ¼±È£ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ÇâÈÄ ½Äµµ¾ÏÀÇ ¼ö¼ú ±â¹ý°ú ¼ú ÈÄ °ü¸®ÀÇ Çâ»óÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© ¹®ÇÕ ºÎÀ§ÀÇ ¿ª·ù·Î ÀÎÇÑ Áõ»ó°ú ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÏ»ó »ýȰÀÇ Áú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á߿伺ÀÌ Áö¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î °Á¶µÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¸ç, ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ Àû±ØÀûÀÎ anti-reflux ¼ö¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °í·Áµµ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.$14.7{pm}2.7$ mL·Î °¢ ±º °£¿¡ Åë°èÀûÀÎ À¯ÀǼºÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(p<0.05). Ç÷û³» Ä®·ý ³óµµ´Â I±º¿¡¼ II±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ¼Ò»ý¼ú ÈÄ ÀÇÀÇ ÀÖ°Ô ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç(p<0.05), Æ÷µµ´ç ³óµµ´Â II´Ü°èÀÇ I±º¿¡¼ Ÿ±º°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ÇöÀúÈ÷ ³·¾Ò´Ù(p<0.05). IL-8Àº I ±º $1,834{pm}437$ pg/mL, II ±º $1,006{pm}532$ pg/mL, III±º $764{pm}302$ pg/mL·Î I ±º¿¡¼ II ¹× III±º°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© Åë°èÀû |
|
| Currently, road mobility improved from the National Road Improvement. Nevertheless delineation system is facility that enhanced driver's safety, that was set up often inconsistent or nonexistent over the road exit ramp So it judged functional investigation will be necessary. This study suggested setting type of the delineation system. That was based on a field study and reviews the legal standard of it and considering driver's cognition behavior. For the study, make a 3D-simulation and so could objectively a comparative test. Comparison variable between delineation setting type is selected conspicuity and visibility. Cased that illustrated characteristics of driver's visual cognition behavior. The experiment was used Eye Marker Recorder for measure the gaze frequency more quantitatively and objectively. And used the ANOVA analysis for significance testing between delineation setting type. A significant percent of the conspicuity analyzed types(Safe mark, Obstacle Sign, Warning Light, and Tubular Maker) in road exit ramp for recognize. And gaze frequency that measure of effectiveness of visibility are measured. On the analysis result, the visibility was significance difference between delineation setting type and visibility of types was best. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ½Ã¼±À¯µµ½Ã¼³;ÀÎÁö¹ÝÀÀ;3D-½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼Ç;ÇöÀú¼º;½ÃÀμº;Áֽúóµµ;delineation;visibility;conspicuity;visual cognition characteristic;gaze frequency;3D-simulation; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.8, no.4, 2006³â, pp.1-11
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200606140740764)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|