¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.9, no.1, 2007³â, pp.57-67
¾Æ½ºÆÈƮȥÇÕ¹°À» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÑ À¯È¿¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® ÇÔ·®ÀÇ »õ·Î¿î °è»ê ¸ðµ¨
( The New Calculation Model of Film Thickness to Evaluat Asphalt Mixtures )
±è¼ºÈ£;±èºÎÀÏ; ;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÃÖ±Ù ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°ÀÇ VMA ȤÀº ±× ¿Ü ´Ù¸¥ üÀû¿ä¼ÒÀÇ ±âÁذªÀ» ´ëüÇϱâ À§ÇØ À¯È¿¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® ÇÔ·®(film thickness)¿¡ ´ëÇØ ³íÀÇµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. À̵é Áß ÀϺδ À¯È¿ ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® ÇÔ·®ÀÇ ±âÁذªÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀϺδ »õ·Î¿î °³³ä ¶Ç´Â °è»ê ¹æ¹ýÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ´Â »õ·Î¿î ¸ðµ¨À» Áï, À妽º ¸ðµ¨(index model) ¶Ç´Â °¡»ó ¸ðµ¨(virtual model)À» ¼Ò°³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢°¢ÀÇ ¸ðµ¨Àº ¾Æ½ºÆÈƮȥÇÕ¹°ÀÇ Ã¼ÀûƯ¼ºÀ» ¼³¸íÇϴµ¥ À־ Çü»ó, Å©±â µî °ñÀçÀÇ Ã¼ÀûƯ¼ºÀ» Á¤·®È­ÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â À妽º ¸ðµ¨°ú °¡»ó ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ ÀåÁ¡À» °áÇÕÇÑ °³¼±µÈ °¡»ó ¸ðµ¨ (modified virtual model)À» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. °³¼±µÈ °¡»ó ¸ðµ¨À» ±âÁ¸ÀÇ µÎ °¡Áö ¸ðµ¨°ú ºñ±³Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© DASR °³³ä¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÏ¿© Á¦ÀÛµÈ ÃÑ 8°³ÀÇ È¥ÇÕ¹°À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î IDT ½ÃÇè°ú APA ½ÃÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÃÇè °á°ú, ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹°ÀÇ °ø¿ë¼º°ú À¯È¿ ¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® ÇÔ·®ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ °è»êÇÔ¿¡ À־ º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ Á¦¾ÈµÈ °¡»ó ¸ðµ¨Àº ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¸ðµ¨µé¿¡ ºñÇØ ´õ ÀûÀýÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
Many researches have recently discussed about the film thickness as a good substitute or supplement for VMA or other volumetric criteria in the design procedure. Some researchers have not only proposed the specific number for the recommended film thickness, but also introduced the new calculation procedures or concepts. Each model (index model and the virtual model) has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of the ability to account for the volumetric properties of the mixture. In this paper, the modified virtual model was proposed to combine advantages from both models. However, it cannot be disregarded the way to determine the appropriate particle shape factors for different sources and sizes of aggregates. In order to evaluate the different calculation methods, mixtures with two aggregate sources and eight gradations were designed based on the dominant aggregate size range (DASR) porosity concept. Superpave indirect tensile test (IDT) and asphalt pavement analyzer (AEA) test were used to describe the performance of mixtures. Test results indicated that the virtual model, which is the same to the modified virtual model for sphere 1:1 case, is better than the conventional standard model to define the range of the film thickness to have better performance of asphalt mixtures.
 
Ű¿öµå
°ñÀç °£±Ø·ü;À¯È¿ ¾ÆÆÄÆÈÆ® ÇÔ·®;¾Æ½ºÆÈÆ® È¥ÇÕ¹° üÀû¿ä¼Ò;À妽º ¸ðµ¨;°¡»ó ¸ðµ¨;voids in mineral aggregate;film thickness;dominant aggregate size range;modified virtual model;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.9, no.1, 2007³â, pp.57-67
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200712242667486)
¾ð¾î : ¿µ¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿