¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.6, no.1, 2004³â, pp.1-11
ÄÜÅ©¸®Æ® °ÅÄ£¸é ¸¶¹«¸®Ã³¸®¿¡ µû¸¥ °ø¿ë¼º Æò°¡
( Performance Evaluation of Surface Textures on Concrete Pavement )
¹Ú±ÇÁ¦;¹®Áعü;Á¶À±È£; Çѱ¹µµ·Î°ø»ç ¼³°è2ºÎ;Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °Ç¼³È¯°æ°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Æ÷Àå °ÅÄ£¸é ¸¶¹«¸® ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ °ø¿ë¼º Æò°¡¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© ±¹³»¿¡ ÃÖÀûÀÇ °ÅÄ£¸é ¸¶¹«¸® °ø¹ýÀ» Á¦¾ÈÇÏ´Â µ¥ ¸ñÀûÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ¼ÒÀ½ ÃøÁ¤ °á°ú ÀÏÁ¤°£°Ý 18mm Á¾¹æÇâ ŸÀÌ´×ÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ ºñ±³±¸°£º¸´Ù ¾à 2$sim$3dB(A) ¼ÒÀ½ °¨¼ÒÈ¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÏÁ¤°£°Ý 18mm Á¾¹æÇâ ŸÀÌ´×°ú 26mm Á¾¹æÇâ ŸÀÌ´×À» ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú 26mm Á¾¹æÇâ ŸÀ̴׿¡¼­ ¾à 2$sim$3dB(A)Áõ°¡ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹Ì²ô·³ ÀúÇ×¼º ÃøÁ¤°á°ú´Â SN40À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇßÀ» °æ¿ì Àü ±¸°£¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾çÈ£ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, Æòź¼º ÃøÁ¤°á°ú AASHTO ±âÁØÀÎ PrI 16cm/km ¹üÀ§ ³»¿¡ Àü ±¸°£ÀÌ Æ÷ÇԵǴ °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í, ½ÇÁ¦ ¿îÀüÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·ÎÇÑ ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¿¡¼­´Â Á¾¹æÇâŸÀÌ´×ÀÇ ÁÖÇà°¨ÀÌ °¡Àå ÁÁÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. À°¾È°üÃøÀ¸·Î ¹è¼ö¼º ÃøÁ¤°á°ú ÀÏÁ¤°£°Ý 26mm Á¾¹æÇâ ŸÀÌ´×°ú ÀϹݱ¸°£(ÀÏÁ¤°£°Ý 25mm Ⱦ¹æÇâ ŸÀÌ´×)¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÑ ¹è¼ö¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¹Ý¸é¿¡ 18mm Á¾¹æÇâ ŸÀÌ´×°ú ÀÓÀǰ£°Ý Ⱦ¹æÇâ¿¡¼­´Â ¹è¼ö´É·ÂÀÌ ÀúÇϵǾú´Ù. Ranking method¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú 18mm Á¾¹æÇâ ŸÀÌ´×ÀÌ °¡Àå ÁÁÀº °ø¹ýÀ¸·Î ¼±Á¤µÇ¾ú°í, ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î 26mm Á¾¹æÇâ ŸÀÌ´×, ÀÓÀǰ£°Ý Ⱦ¹æÇâ, Ⱦ¹æÇâ ¾µ±â¼øÀ¸·Î ¼±Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù.
This study tries to propose the most effective pavement texture method through the performance evaluation of variable texture methods. Noise 2$sim$3dB is reduced in the section of uniform space 18m longitudinal tinning. This result is proved by comparing the magnitude of noise in two sections. The noise of 26mm longitudinal firming section is greater than that of 18mm section by 2$sim$3dB(A). The skid resistances measured in all test section show the reasonable results. The roughness or all the test sections satisfies AASHTO roughness standard (PrI 16cm/km). The result or questionnaire survey about driving quality shows that the longitudinal tinning is the most effective method. As the result of a visual measurement, it is proved that the section applied uniform space 26mm longitudinal tinning and the general section applied uniform space 26mm transverse tinning could drain water effectively. As the result of analysis with the ranking method, the 18mm longitudinal tinning in selected as one of the most effective tinning methods. In addition, 26mm longitudinal tinning, random space transverse tinning, and transverse drag are selected in order.
 
Ű¿öµå
Á¾¹æÇâ ŸÀÌ´×;¼ÒÀ½;Á֯ļöºÐ¼®;Ç¥¸éó¸®;longitudinal tinning;noise;skid resistance;roughness;drainage;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.6, no.1, 2004³â, pp.1-11
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200415637516205)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿