¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.12, no.4, 2010³â, pp.79-86
VISSIMÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ´ÙÀ̾Ƹóµå ÀÔü±³Â÷Á¡¿¡¼­ÀÇ È¸Àü±³Â÷·Î È¿°úºÐ¼®
( Analysis on the effectiveness of roundabout at the diamond interchange using VISSIM )
±èÅ¿µ;±è°æÈ¯;¹Úº´È£; ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°øÇаú;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°øÇаú;ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÀÌ ¿¬±¸´Â ´ÙÀ̾Ƹóµå ÀÔü±³Â÷Á¡¿¡¼­ ¼³Ä¡µÇ´Â ȸÀü±³Â÷·Î¸¦ ´Ù·ç°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ½ÅÈ£±³Â÷·Î¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© »ó´ëÀûÀΠȸÀü±³Â÷·ÎÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®Çϴµ¥ ÀÖ´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ È¸Àü±³Â÷·Î¿Í ½ÅÈ£±³Â÷·Î¸¦ ±³Åë·®º°·Î ½Ã³ª¸®¿À¸¦ ÀÛ¼ºÇϰí VISSIMÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®µÈ ÁÖ¿ä °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ù°, ´Ü±¸ ¹× ½Ö±¸ ȸÀü±³Â÷·Î´Â ȸÀü±³Åë·® ºñÀ²ÀÌ 10:5:5ÀÎ °æ¿ì ÃÑ ÁøÀÔ±³Åë·®ÀÌ 2,400pcph ÀÌ»ó, 10:2:8ÀÎ °æ¿ì 2,800pcph ÀÌ»ó, ±×¸®°í 10:8:2ÀÎ °æ¿ì 4,400pcph À̻󿡼­ ±Þ°ÝÇÑ Áöüº¯È­¸¦ °®´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÈ´Ù. µÑ°, ȸÀü±³Åë·® ºñÀ²ÀÌ 10:5:5ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ÃÑ ÁøÀÔ±³Åë·®ÀÌ 4,000pcph ÀÌÇÏ, ±×¸®°í 10:2:8ÀÎ °æ¿ì¿£ 4,400pcph ÀÌÇÏ¿¡¼­ ȸÀü±³Â÷·Î°¡ ½ÅÈ£±³Â÷·Î º¸´Ù È¿°úÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÈ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ È¸Àü±³Åë·® ºñÀ²ÀÌ 10:8:2ÀÎ °æ¿ì ½Ö±¸ ȸÀü±³Â÷·Î´Â 5,600pcph ÀÌÇÏ¿¡¼­ ½ÅÈ£±³Â÷·Î¿¡ ºñÇØ È¿°úÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÈ´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î, ½Ö±¸ ȸÀü±³Â÷·Î´Â ÃÑ ÁøÀÔ±³Åë·®ÀÌ 4,400pcph ÀÌÇÏÀÇ °æ¿ì¿£ ´Ü±¸¿Í ºñ½ÁÇÏÁö¸¸, 4,400pcph ÀÌ»óÀÇ °æ¿ì¿£ ´Ü±¸ ȸÀü±³Â÷·Îº¸´Ù È¿À²ÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
This study deals with the roundabout installed at the diamond interchange. The goal is to analyze the relative effectiveness of roundabout to signalized intersection. In pursuing the above, this study gives the particular attentions to comparing the performances using VISSIM software. The main results analyzed are as follows. First, the single and double roundabouts are analyzed to have the rapid change of delay in the case of total entering vehicles of more than 2,400pcph for directional rate 10:5:5, 2,800pcph for 10:8:2, and 4,400pcph for 10:2:8. Second, the roundabouts are evaluated to be more effective than signalized intersection in the case of total entering vehicles of less than 4,000pcph for directional rate 10:5:5, and 4,400pcph for 10:2:8. In the case of directional rate 10:8:2, double roundabout of total entering vehicles less than 5,600pcph is analyzed to be more effective than signalized intersection. Finally, the performance of double roundabout is analyzed to be very similar to that of single roundabout in the case of total entering vehicles less than 4,400pcph. However, the double roundabout is evaluated to be more effective than single in the case of total entering vehicles more than 4,400pcph.
 
Ű¿öµå
ȸÀü±³Â÷·Î;ÀÔü±³Â÷Á¡;Æò±ÕÁöü;´Ü±¸ ȸÀü±³Â÷·Î;½Ö±¸ ȸÀü±³Â÷·Î;roundabout;interchange;average delay;single roundabout;double roundabout;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.12, no.4, 2010³â, pp.79-86
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201014654457729)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿