¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.13, no.1, 2011³â, pp.185-195
¼öÄ¡ÇØ¼®À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ç×°ø±â °úÁÖ¹æÁö Æ÷Àå½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ Æò°¡¹æ¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( A Study on Evaluation of Aircraft Rapid Arresting System Using the Numerical Analysis )
ÀÌ¿µ¼ö;±èÃá¼±;ÇÏ¿íÀç;ÇÑÀçÇö; Á¤Àαâ¼ú´Ü;Á¤Àαâ¼ú´Ü;Á¤Àαâ¼ú´Ü;Çѱ¹±³Å뿬±¸¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Ç×°ø±â °ü·Ã »ç°í´Â ¸¹Àº ÀθíÇÇÇØ ¹× ¹°ÁúÀû ¼ÕÇØ°¡ Å©°Ô ¹ß»ýÇÑ´Ù. ÇöÀç ±¹³» Ç×°ø±â ȰÁÖ·Î °ü·Ã »ç°í´Â Àüü »ç°íÀÇ 28%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ±¹Á¦ÀûÀ¸·Î 33%ÀÇ Ç×°ø±â ȰÁÖ·Î »ç°í°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ »ç°í¸¦ ¿¹¹æÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© FAA¿¡¼­´Â ±ÔÁ¤¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡Áö ¸øÇϴ ȰÁÖ·Î Á¾´Ü¾ÈÀü±¸¿ª¿¡ °úÁÖ¹æÁö Æ÷Àå½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¼³Ä¡¸¦ Àǹ«È­Çϰí ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¾ÈÀü¼º È®º¸¸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© ȰÁÖ·Î Á¾´Ü¾ÈÀü±¸¿ªÀÌ ±ÔÁ¤¿¡ ¸¸Á·ÇÏ´õ¶óµµ °úÁÖ¹æÁö Æ÷Àå½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¼³Ä¡¸¦ ±Ç°íÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ±¹Á¦Àû Á¤¼¼¿¡ ¸ÂÃß¾î ±¹³»¿¡¼­µµ °úÁÖ¹æÁö Æ÷Àå½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç °úÁÖ¹æÁö Æ÷Àå½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ±¹³» µµÀÔ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀýÂ÷µµ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â °úÁÖ¹æÁö Æ÷Àå½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÎ ¼º´ÉÆò°¡¸¦ ÇϱâÀ§ÇÏ¿© FAA¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ARRESTOR ÇÁ·Î±×·¥°ú 3Â÷¿ø ºñ¼±Çü µ¿ÀûÇØ¼®ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ LSDYNA¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ç×°ø±âÀÇ È°ÁÖ·Î °úÁÖ¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¦µ¿°Å¸®, °ßÀηÂ, ¼öÁ÷·Â ¹× °üÀÔ·®À» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇØ¼® °á°ú Á¦µ¿°Å¸®´Â ºñ½ÁÇÏ°Ô ÇØ¼®µÇ¾ú°í, °ßÀη ¹× ¼öÁ÷·ÂÀº ´Ù¼Ò Â÷À̰¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´À¸³ª °æÇâÀº ºñ½ÁÇÏ°Ô µµÃâµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÃßÈÄ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Ç×°ø±â Á¶°Ç ¹× Æ÷ÀåÀç·áÀÇ Æ¯Â¡À» °í·ÁÇÑ 3Â÷¿ø ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ÇØ¼®ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, Áö¼ÓÀûÀÎ ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ÇØ¼® ±â¹ýÀ» °³¹ßÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù Á¤È®ÇÑ ÇØ¼®¹æ¹ýÀ» °³¹ßÇÒ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ´Ù.
Aircraft-related accidents cause mass casualties and major material damages. At present, runway-related accidents in our country account for 28% of all air accidents. Furthermore, internationally 33% of all air accidents is connected with runway. To prevent these accidents, FAA mandates the installation of aircraft rapid arresting system(ARAS) at the runway end safety areas which do not meet the FAA requirements. Even if the areas satisfy the conditions, FAA recommends the installation of ARAS to ensure the safety. In accordance of the international affairs, the domestic studies for ARAS are in progress and the legal formalities for domestic adoption of ARAS is under way. In this study, we analyzed the stopping distance, drag force, vertical force and tire penetration of runway overrun to assess the performance of ARAS reasonably by using two different kinds of analysis programs. The first is ARRESTOR program adopted by FAA, and the second is LS-DYNA which is available for 3-dimensional nonlineal dynamic analysis. As a result, analytically the stopping distances between two programs are similar. The drag force is rather different, but the tendencies are similar. Later on, the 3-dimensional simulation analysis considering various air-craft condition and properties of packaging materials is necessary. In addition, ongoing development of simulation analysis program is required for more accurate analistic results.
 
Ű¿öµå
°úÁÖ¹æÁö Æ÷Àå½Ã½ºÅÛ;ȰÁÖ·Î Á¾´Ü¾ÈÀü±¸¿ª;ARRESTOR ÇÁ·Î±×·¥;3Â÷¿ø ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼Ç;aircraft rapid arresting system;runway end safety area;ARRESTOR program;LS-DYNA;3-dimensional simulation analysis;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.13, no.1, 2011³â, pp.185-195
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201117148819915)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿