¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ / v.13, no.3, 2011³â, pp.177-184
°í¼Óµµ·Î¿Í ±¹µµ¿¡¼­ Â÷·® ´ç ź¼Ò°¡½º ¹èÃâ·® ºñ±³ - °æºÎ °í¼Óµµ·Î¿Í 1¹ø±¹µµÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î -
( Comparison of Vehicle Carbon Emissions in Expressway and National Highway )
ÀÌÀ±¼®;¿ÀÈï¿î; °æ±â´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã±³Åë°øÇаú;°æ±â´ëÇб³ µµ½Ã±³Åë°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
°í¼Óµµ·Î¿Í ÀϹݱ¹µµ´Â µµ·ÎÀÇ ±¸Á¶, Á¶°ÇÀ̳ª ¼Óµµ µîÀÌ ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³­´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Æ¯¼º¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ $CO_2$ ¹èÃâ·® ¿ª½Ã ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³­´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸ °í¼Óµµ·Î¿Í ÀϹݱ¹µµ¿¡¼­ ¹èÃâµÇ´Â $CO_2$ÀÇ ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸´Â ¹ÌºñÇÑ ½ÇÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ÀÌÀ¯·Î °í¼Óµµ·Î¿Í ÀϹݱ¹µµ¿¡¼­ÀÇ $CO_2$ ¹èÃâ·®À» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© °æºÎ°í¼Óµµ·Î¿Í 1¹ø±¹µµ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®À» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ù°, Àüü ±¸°£ÀÇ Â÷·® ´ç $CO_2$ ¹èÃâ·®À» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÑ°, ¼¼ºÎ ±¸°£ Áß »óÀ§ ·©Å©µÈ 10°³ÀÇ ±¸°£À» »ó¼¼ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼Â°, Â÷·® ´ç $CO_2$ ¹èÃâ·®ÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹Àº ±¸°£°ú °¡Àå ÀûÀº ±¸°£À» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© ¼¼ºÎÀûÀ¸·Î ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú °í¼Óµµ·ÎÀÇ °æ¿ì ±³Â÷·Î³ª ½ÅÈ£ µîÀÇ Á¦¾àÁ¶°ÇÀÌ ¾ø¾î °ÅÀÇ µî¼Óµµ·Î ¿îÇàÀ» Çϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ $CO_2$ ¹èÃâ·®ÀÌ Àû°í, ÀϹݱ¹µµÀÇ °æ¿ì ±³Â÷·Î ¹× ½ÅÈ£·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© °¡°¨¼Ó ¿îÇàÀ» Çϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ $CO_2$ ¹èÃâ·®ÀÌ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ±¹°¡ÀûÀ¸·Î ±³Â÷·Î ¼ö Á¶Á¤ ¹× ½ÅÈ£ ¿¬µ¿È­¸¦ °³¼±ÇÑ´Ù¸é ÀϹݱ¹µµ¿¡¼­ $CO_2$ ¹èÃâ·®À» Àú°¨ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â Ãß·ÐÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù.
There are several differences between freeways and general national roads in terms of structures, conditions and limited speeds. Likewise, the characteristics of $CO_2$ emission in these roads differ depending on the road types. For these reasons, it is necessary to compare the two types of roads in terms of $CO_2$ emissions. The study was performed targeting Gyeongbu Expressway and National Highway 1. Firstly, the amount of $CO_2$ emission each car was compared in the whole sections of the both. Secondly, top 10 sections were picked out, and then $CO_2$ emission each section were compared. Lastly, two sections which were with the highest and lowest amount of $CO_2$ emission per car, were compared. As results, it were found that there were less amount of $CO_2$ emission on freeways. because cars are running on uniform velocity at relatively high speed, and that there were more amount of $CO_2$ emission on the national highway. because of frequent intersections and associated congestion. It may be concluded that the amount of $CO_2$ emission at the national highway could be reduced if signal coordination and intersection intervals are improved there.
 
Ű¿öµå
°í¼Óµµ·Î;ÀϹݱ¹µµ;ź¼Ò;ź¼Ò¹èÃâ;freeway;national highway;carbon;carbon emission;
 
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ³í¹®Áý / v.13, no.3, 2011³â, pp.177-184
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1738-7159
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201131263125288)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿