¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.18, no.3, 2009³â, pp.253-257
ÆÄÇÁ¸®Ä« Àç¹è ¿Â½ÇÀÇ ÇǺ¹Àç Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ ȯ°æ¿äÀΰú ¼ö·®¼º
( Effects of Greenhouse Covering Material on Environment Factors and Fruit Yield in Protected Cultivation of Sweet Pepper )
±èȣö;Á¤¼®±â;ÀÌÁ¤Çö;¹èÁ¾Çâ; ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹.¾Ö¿Ïµ¿½Ä¹°ÇкÎ;¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹.¾Ö¿Ïµ¿½Ä¹°ÇкÎ;Àü³²´ëÇб³ ½Ä¹°»ý¸í°øÇкÎ;¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹.¾Ö¿Ïµ¿½Ä¹°ÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÆÄÇÁ¸®Ä« Àç¹è ¿Â½ÇÀÇ ÇǺ¹Àç Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ »ý»ê¼º Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ ÁÖ¿ä ȯ°æ¿äÀÎÀÇ ¿µÇâ Á¤µµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®À» À§ÇØ À¯¸®¿Â½Ç°ú ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½Çʸ§¿Â½ÇÀÇ È¯°æ¿äÀÎ ´©Àûµ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ ¼öÁýÇÏ¿© ¼ö·®°ú ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. À¯¸®¿Â½ÇÀº ¿ÜºÎ±¤·®°ú ¼ö·® °£ Á¤ÀÇ»ó°üÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú°í, $100MJ{cdot}m^{-2}$ ´ç $300{sim}500g{cdot}m^{-2}$ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, Àû»ê¿Âµµµµ °°Àº °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í ¼ö·® ¿¹Ãø ¸ðµ¨ °³¹ß¿¡ À־´Â Àû»ê¿Âµµ°¡ ¿ÜºÎ±¤·®º¸´Ù °¡´É¼ºÀ» ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ÃÖ´ë ¼ø±¤ÇÕ¼ºÀº À¯¸®¿Â½Ç¿¡¼­ $16.83{mu}mol{cdot}m^{-2}{cdot}s^{-1}$·Î ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½Çʸ§¿Â½ÇÀÇ $14.93{mu}mol{cdot}m^{-2}{cdot}s^{-1}$º¸´Ù 13% Á¤µµ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ´ÜÀ§ ±¤·®´ç »ý»ê¼ºÀº À¯¸®¿Â½Ç¿¡¼­ ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½Çʸ§¿Â½Çº¸´Ù 46% Á¤µµ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±×¸®°í ´ÜÀ§ ±â°£´ç »ý»ê¼ºµµ À¯¸®¿Â½Ç¿¡¼­ ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½Çʸ§¿Â½Ç¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù 47%³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼ö·®¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¤, ¿Âµµ, $CO_2$¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ºÐ¼® °á°ú »ó´ë¼ö·®°è¼ö, ¼ö·®Áõ°¡°è¼ö, ¼ö·®°¨¼Ò°è¼ö ¹× ÃÖ´ë¼ö·®°è¼ö´Â À¯¸®¿Â½Ç¿¡¼­ ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½Çʸ§¿Â½Çº¸´Ù °¢°¢ 25%, 73%, 34% ¹× 49%³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ À¯¸®¿Â½Ç¿¡¼­ ÆÄÇÁ¸®Ä« Àç¹è ½Ã ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½Çʸ§¿Â½Ç¿¡ ºñÇØ »ý»ê¼ºÀº ³ôÀ¸³ª, ȯ°æ¿äÀÎÀÇ ±Þ°ÝÇÑ º¯È­¿¡ ´õ ¹Î°¨ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
To analysis effect of environment factors on productivity of sweet pepper according to greenhouse covering material (glass, plastic film), this was investigated. In glasshouse, outside light was positively correlated with yield as that $100MJ{cdot}m^{-2}$ of outside light increased $300{sim}500g{cdot}m^{-2}$, also cumulative temperature was same tendency. On possibility of model development for yield estimate cumulative temperature was high than outside light. According to covering material, leaf photosynthesis, productivity per out-side light and term in glasshouse was more high 13%, 46%, and 47% compared with plastic film house, respectively. Result of analysis of effect of light, temperature, and $CO_2$ on yield, relative yield coefficient, yield increment coefficient, and yield reduction coefficient in glasshouse were more high 25%, 73%, and 34% compared with plastic film house, respectively. Hence, sweet pepper's growing in glasshouse compare with plastic film house had more productivity, but that had more sensitivity to charge of environment factors.
 
Ű¿öµå
»ý»ê¼º;¼ö·®;ÇǺ¹Àç;ȯ°æ¿äÀÎ;covering material;environment factors;productivity;yield;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.3, 2009³â, pp.253-257
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200935535843638)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿