¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.18, no.3, 2009³â, pp.232-237
±â´É¼º ÇǺ¹Àç°¡ Å丶Åä »ýÀ° ¹× ǰÁú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effects of High Performance Greenhouse Films on Growth and Fruit Quality of Tomato )
±ÇÁر¹;Á¶¸íȯ;°­³²ÁØ;°­À±ÀÓ;¹Ú°æ¼·;ÀÌÀçÇÑ; ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ½Ã¼³¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå;±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ½Ã¼³¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå;±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ½Ã¼³¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå;±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ½Ã¼³¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå;±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ½Ã¼³¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå;±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ¿ø¿¹±âȹÁ¶Á¤°ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÀϹÝÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ¿ëµÇ´Â EVA Çʸ§°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© Æú¸®¿Ã·¹ÇÉ(PO), ºÒ¼Ò, ¹æÀû, ¹æ¹«, º¸¿ÂÇʸ§ µîÀÇ ±â´É¼ºÇʸ§ÀÌ Å丶ÅäÀÇ Ç°Áú¿¡ ¾î¶² ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °¡¸¦ ±¸¸íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ±¤Åõ°úƯ¼º¿¡ ÀÖ¾î Àڿܼ±Àº ºÒ¼ÒÇʸ§ÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í POÇʸ§ÀÌ °¡Àå Àû¾úÀ¸¸ç, PAR´Â ºÒ¼Ò, º¸¿Â, POÇʸ§ µîÀÌ ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ±ÙÀû¿Ü¼±µµ EVA¿¡ ºñÇØ ±â´É¼ºÇʸ§ÀÌ ¸¹Àº °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. Àüü±¤¼±ÀÇ Åõ°úÀ²Àº ºÒ¼Ò, ¹æ¹«, ¹æÀû, PO, º¸¿Â, EVA ¼øÀ¸·Î ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ÇϿ콺 ³» ÁÖ°£¿Âµµ´Â ±¤Åõ°úÀ² Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ºÒ¼ÒÇʸ§ÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô°í EVA°¡ °¡Àå ³·¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ¾ß°£¿Âµµ´Â Çʸ§ÀÌ µÎ²¨¿î ¹æÀû ¹× POÇʸ§ÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô À¯ÁöµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±â´É¼ºÇʸ§Àº EVA¿¡ ºñÇØ °ú½Ç ´çµµ°¡ $0.2{sim}0.5^{circ}Bx$ ´õ ³ô¾Ò°í, °ú½Ç ³» ¶óÀÌÄÚÆæ ÇÔ·®ÀÌ $15{sim}30%$ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ Å丶ÅäÀÇ ´çµµ, ¶óÀÌÄÚÆæ ÇÔ·® µîÀÇ Ç°ÁúÇâ»óÀ» À§Çؼ­´Â ÀϹÝÇʸ§ ´ë½Å¿¡ ±â´É¼ºÇʸ§À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ È¿°úÀûÀÏ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù.
This study was performed to investigate the effect of high performance greenhouse films on growth and fruit quality of tomato. For this purpose, polyolefin (PO), fluoric, antidrop, antifog and thermal films were compared to normal film, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA). In spectral irradiance of the films, UV ($300{sim}400nm$) transmittance was highest in fluoric film and lowest in PO film. PAR (photosynthetically active radiation, $400{sim}700nm$) transmittance was higher in fluoric, thermal and PO film, and near infrared ray (NIR, $700{sim}1,100nm$) transmittance was higher in high performance films, compared to the EVA film. Total light transmittance was higher in order of fluoric, antifog, anti drop, PO, thermal, and EVA film. Day air temperature in greenhouse was highest under fluoric film and lowest under EVA film due to the light transmittance, while night air temperature was highest under PO and anti drop film due to the thickness of film. Tomato fruits grown under the high performance films had 0.2 to $0.5^{circ}Bx$ higher soluble solids and 15 to 30% higher lycopene content, compared to those grown under the EVA film. The results showed that tomato fruit quality such as soluble solids and lycopene content can be heightened in terms of much irradiation and better light quality of high performance films, compared to the nomal film, EVA film.
 
Ű¿öµå
±â´É¼º ÇϿ콺Çʸ§;Å丶Åä;ºÐ±¤Åõ°úƯ¼º;±¤Åõ°úÀ²;high performance greenhouse films;tomato;spectral irradiance;light transmittance;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.3, 2009³â, pp.232-237
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200935535843634)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿