¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.18, no.3, 2009³â, pp.177-184
¿Â½Ç¼³ºñ ÀÛµ¿¿ë ž籤¹ßÀü½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ ¹ßÀü ¼º´É ºÐ¼®
( Power Generating Performance of Photovoltaic Power System for Greenhouse Equipment Operation )
À±¿ëö;¹è¿ëÇÑ;À¯¿µ¼±;À̼ºÇö;¼­¿ø¸í; °æ»ó´ëÇб³ Áö¿ªÈ¯°æ±â¹Ý°øÇаú(³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇבּ¸¿ø);°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³³ó¾÷°úÇпø;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³³ó¾÷°úÇпø;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ Áö¿ªÈ¯°æ±â¹Ý°øÇаú(³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇבּ¸¿ø);
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¿Â½Ç ¿î¿µ¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ Àü·Â·®À» È®º¸ÇÔÀ¸·Î¼­ ¿Â½Ç°æ¿µºñ Àý°¨À» ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ì¼± ž籤¹ßÀü½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ¿Â½ÇÀÇ ÀÎÁ¢ÇÑ °Ç¹°ÀÇ ¿Á»ó¿¡ ¼³Ä¡ÇÏ¿© ±â»ó»óÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹ßÀü·®À» ½ÇÇèÀûÀ¸·Î °ËÅäÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ½ÇÇè±â°£ µ¿¾È ÃÖ°í, Æò±Õ ¹× ÃÖÀú¿Âµµ´Â °¢°¢ $0.4{sim}34.1,;-6.1{sim}22.2$ ¹× $-14.1{sim}16.7^{circ}C$ Á¤µµÀÇ ¹üÀ§¿¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í Àϻ緮ÀÇ °æ¿ì, ÃÖ´ë, Æò±Õ ¹× ÃÖÀú°ªÀº °¢°¢ $28.8MJ{cdot}m^{-2}$, $14.9MJ{cdot}m^{-2}$ ¹× $0.6MJ{cdot}m^{-2}$ Á¤µµ¿´°í, Àü·ÂÀº Àϻ緮¿¡ ºñ·ÊÇØ¼­ Áõ°¡ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ¾à 750W ÀüÈÄ¿¡¼­ °ÅÀÇ ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ÀÏÀÏ ÃÖ´ë, Æò±Õ ¹× ÃÖ¼Ò ¼ÒºñÀü·Â·®Àº °¢°¢ ¾à 5.2kWh, 2.5kWh¹× 0kWhÁ¤µµ¿´´Ù. º» ½ÇÇè¿¡ »ç¿ëµÈ ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ Æò±Õ ¼ÒºñÀü·Â·®À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î º¸¸é, ¿Âdz±âÀÇ ¿ë·® ¹× ÀÛµ¿½Ã°£ÀÌ ÀÛÀº °æ¿ì´Â ÃæºÐÇÏÁö¸¸ Å« °æ¿ì´Â ºÎÁ·ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿Âdz±âÀÇ ¿ë·®ÀÌ Å« °æ¿ì, ¾î·¹ÀÌ ¸éÀûÀÌ ÇöÀçÀÇ ¾à 3¹èÀÎ ¾à $21m^2$ Á¤µµÀÌ¸é Æò±Õ Àü·Â·®À¸·Î ÃæºÐÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¹°·Ð ¾î·¹ÀÌÀÇ ¿Âµµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â ÇÑ ¿©¸§Ã¶¿¡´Â Àϻ緮¿¡ ºñ·ÊÇØ¼­ ¹ß»ý Àü·ÂÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÁö¸¸, ÇöÀç±îÁö ½ÇÇè°á°ú·Î º¸¸é, µÎ ÀÎÀÚ°£¿¡ »ó°ü°è¼ö°¡ 0.84 Á¤µµ·Î »ó°ü°ü°è°¡ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
For the purpose of reducing the cost for greenhouse operation by acquiring the electric power necessary for it, this study installed a solar photovoltaic system on the roof of the building adjacent to green-houses and experimentally examined the quantity of power generation based on weather conditions. The results of the study are as per the below: The maximum, average and minimum temperature while the experiment was conducted was $0.4{sim}34.1,;-6.1{sim}22.2$, and $-14.1{sim}16.7^{circ}C$ respectively, and the solar radiation was $28.8MJ{cdot}m^{-2}$ (maximum), $14.9MJ{cdot}m^{-2}$ (average), and $0.6MJ{cdot}m^{-2}$ (minimum). The quantity of electric power didn't increase in proportion to the quantity of solar radiation and instead, it was almost consistent around 750W. Daily maximum, average and minimum consumption of electric power was 5.2kWh, 2.5kWh and 0kWh respectively. Based on the average electric power consumption of the system used for this experiment, it was sufficient in case the capacity and the working time of a hot blast heater are small, but it was short in case they are big. In case the capacity of the hot blast heater is big, the average electric power quantity will be sufficient for array area $21m^2$, about three times of the present area. In summer when the temperature of the array becomes high, the generation of electric power didn't increase in proportion to the quantity of solar radiation, but this experiment result shows a high correlation between two factors (coefficient of correlation 0.84).
 
Ű¿öµå
¿Âµµ;¿Â½Ç;Àϻ緮;Àü·Â;Àü·Â·®;žçÀüÁö¸ðµâ;electric energy;electric power;greenhouse;solar photovoltaic module;solar radiation;temperature;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.3, 2009³â, pp.177-184
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200935535843623)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿