¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.17, no.3, 2008³â, pp.181-187
°£ÀÌ ´ÀŸ¸®Àç¹è»çÀÇ ±¸Á¶ ¾ÈÀü¼º Æò°¡
( Evaluation of Structural Stability of a Simple-typed Cultivation Facility for Growing Pleurotus ostreatus )
¿°¼ºÇö;À±³²±Ô;±èö¼ö; ³óÃÌÁøÈïû;³óÃÌÁøÈïû;°­¸ª´ëÇб³ ±â°èÀÚµ¿Â÷°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÇØ¼® ÄÚµåÀÎ ANSYS¸¦ ÀÌ¿ë, Æø 5.6m°£ÀÌ ´ÀŸ¸®Àç¹è»ç¸¦ 3Â÷¿ø °­»À´ë ±¸Á¶¹°·Î ¸ðµ¨¸µÇÏ¿© º£µå±âµÕ ÇüÅ ¹× ÆÄÀÌÇÁ ±Ô°Ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ±¸Á¶Àû ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Çã¿ëÀÀ·Â ¼³°è¹ý¿¡ ±âÃÊÇØ ±¸Á¶¾ÈÀü ¿©ºÎ¸¦ ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àü»ê±¸Á¶ ÇØ¼® °á°ú, º£µå±âµÕ¿¡ µû¸¥ ±¸Á¶Àû ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀº ¾ÈÀüÀû¼³½ÉÀÇ °æ¿ì, Á÷¸³Çü º£µå±âµÕ ±¸Á¶°¡ ´Ù¸¥ º£µå±âµÕ Çüź¸´Ù ÈξÀ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª ¾ÈÀüdz¼Ó Ãø¸é¿¡¼­´Â Çüź° Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¼­±î·¡ ±Ô°Ý°ú º£µå±âµÕ ¼³Ä¡ °£°Ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ±¸Á¶Àû ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀº º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ °í·ÁÇÑ ÆÄÀÌÇÁ ±Ô°Ý ¹üÀ§¿¡ À־ ¾ÈÀüdz¼Ó Ãø¸éÀÇ °æ¿ì, º£µå±âµÕ ¼³Ä¡°£°Ýº¸´Ù ½Ã¼³ ¿ÜºÎÀû ¿ä¼ÒÀÎ ¼­±î·¡ °£°Ý¿¡ ´õ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹Þ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª ¾ÈÀüÀû¼³½É Ãø¸é¿¡¼­´Â ¾ÈÀü dz¼Ó°ú´Â ¹Ý´ë·Î ¼­±î·¡ °£°Ýº¸´Ù´Â ½Ã¼³ ³»ºÎÀû ±¸Á¶¹°ÀÎ º£µå±âµÕ °£°ÝÀÌ ´õ Áß¿äÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. º£µå±âµÕÀÇ Á±¼¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀº ÇØ¼®ÀÇ ¸ðµç °æ¿ì¿¡¼­ ¾ÈÀüÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
The structural stability of a simple-typed cultivation facility with a width of 5.6 m for growing Pleurotus ostreatus was analyzed by modeling the facility as three-dimensional steel frames. The computation was done by using the finite element analysis program, ANSYS and the criterion of determining structural stability was based on the allowable stress design (ASD). The computational results showed that the structure with a straight-typed bed column was more stable than those with other types of bed columns against snow depth but there was little difference against wind velocity. As results, the interval of rafter had a more influence on safety wind velocity than that of bed column, while the interval of bed column was more important to safety snow depth. Finally the bed column against buckling was stable in all cases considered in this paper.
 
Ű¿öµå
±¸Á¶ ¾ÈÀü¼º;´ÀŸ¸®;¾Ø½Ã½º;Àç¹è»ç;Á±¼;ANSYS;buckling;cultivation facility;Pleurotus ostreatus;structural stability;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.17, no.3, 2008³â, pp.181-187
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200835054212751)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿