¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.17, no.3, 2008³â, pp.226-230
È¥ÇÕ ½Ïä¼ÒÀÇ MAP¸¦ À§ÇÑ Æ÷ÀåÀç ºñ±³
( Comparison Packing Materials for Proper MAP of Mixed Sprout Vegetables )
°­È£¹Î;ÃÖÀÎÀÌ;±èÀϼ·; °­¿ø´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
È¥ÇÕ ½Ïä¼ÒÀÇ MAP¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ Æ÷ÀåÀ縦 ¼±¹ßÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¾ËÆÈÆÄ, ºê·ÎÄݸ®, ¾ç¹èÃß, ¹«, ±×¸®°í Àû¹«ÀÇ È¥ÇÕ ½Ïä¼Ò¸¦ $50{mu}m$ µÎ²²ÀÇ low-density polyethylene Çʸ§(PE 50), $50{mu}m$ µÎ²²ÀÇ polypropylene Çʸ§(PP 50), $50{mu}m$ µÎ²²ÀÇ ceramic Çʸ§(CE 50), $25{mu}m$ µÎ²² ceramic Çʸ§(CE 25), $10sim13{mu}m$ µÎ²²ÀÇ polyethylene film(wrap), ±×¸®°í Åë±â±¸°¡ ÀÖ´Â polyethylene terephthalate ¹Ú½º(box)·Î Æ÷ÀåÇÏ¿© $8^{circ}C$¿¡¼­ ÀúÀå ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀúÀå Áß È¥ÇÕ ½Ïä¼ÒÀÇ »ýüÁßÀº 7%ÀÇ °¨¼Ò¸¦ º¸ÀÎ box󸮱¸¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¸ðµç 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ 2% ¹Ì¸¸ÀÇ °¨¼Ò¸¸À» º¸¿´´Ù. Æ÷ÀåÀç ³»ºÎ ´ë±â´Â Çʸ§ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. CE 25´Â »ê¼Ò¿Í ÀÌ»êȭź¼Ò ¸ðµÎ 5% ¼öÁØÀ̾úÀ¸³ª, PE 50°ú CE 50Àº À̺¸´Ù ³ôÀº ÀÌ»êȭź¼Ò¿Í ³·Àº »ê¼Ò ³óµµ¸¦ º¸¿´´Âµ¥, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ´ë±â Á¶¼º º¯È­°¡ À̵é 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ÀÌÃë°¡ °¡Àå ½ÉÇß´ø ¿øÀÎÀ̶ó »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ÀúÀå 10Àϰ Æ÷ÀåÀç ³» ¿¡Æ¿·» ³óµµ´Â box°¡ °¡Àå ³·¾Ò°í, ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î PP 50, wrap, CE 25ÀÇ ¼ø¼­·Î ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ¿Ü°ü»ó ǰÁúÀÌ ÀúÇϰ¡ °¡Àå ½ÉÇÏ¿´´ø PE 50°ú CE 50¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÒ ¶§, 1% ¹Ì¸¸ÀÇ »ýüÁß °¨¼Ò¿Í 5% ¼öÁØÀÇ ÀÌ»êȭź¼Ò¿Í »ê¼Ò ³óµµ, ±×¸®°í 4ppm ÀÌÇÏÀÇ ¿¡Æ¿·» ³óµµ¸¦ º¸ÀÎ CE 25°¡ È¥ÇÕ ½Ïä¼Ò¿¡ °¡Àå ÀûÇÕÇÑ Æ÷ÀåÀçÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
A comparison was made of the effect of different packaging materials on storability of mixed sprout vegetables (alfalfa, broccoli, cabbage, radish, and red radish) stored at $8^{circ}C$. They were packaged by several kinds of films that were 50 fm thickness low-density polyethylene film (PE 50), 50 fm thickness polypropylene film (PP 50), $50{mu}m$ thickness ceramic film (CE 50), $25{mu}m$ thickness ceramic film (CE 25), $10sim13{mu}m$ thickness polyethylene film (wrap), and polyethylene terephthalate box with ventilation hole (box). The fresh weight of mixed sprouts packaged with different materials decreased below to 2% except box packages that decreased around 7% compared with initial weight. The atmospheres that were developed inside the different materials during storage differed significantly. The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentration of packages were kept properly with 5% in CE 25, but the PE 50 and CE 50 treatments showed higher carbon dioxide and lower oxygen concentration. So the off-flavor of mixed sprouts was more severe in the PE 50 and CE 50 treatment. The ethylene concentration of packages showed lowest in box treatment, followed by PP 50, wrap and CE 25 treatment. The overall quality of mixed sprouts was lower in PE 50 and CE 50 than CE 25 treatment after 10 days storage, supposed to be resulted from highest ethylene concentration and lowest oxygen concentration. Conclusionally, the CE 25 film that showed below 1% fresh weight loss, 5% carbon dioxide, 5% oxygen and below 4 ppm ethylene concentration in package may be a proper packaging material for mixed sprout vegetables.
 
Ű¿öµå
»ê¼Ò;¿¡Æ¿·»;¿Ü°ü»ó ǰÁú;ÀÌ»êȭź¼Ò;ÀÌÃë;carbon dioxide;ethylene;off-flavor;overall quality;oxygen;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.17, no.3, 2008³â, pp.226-230
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200835054212764)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿