|
|
|
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.19, no.1, 2010³â, pp.36-48
|
»óÀÌÇÑ ÇÇÀ½Á¶°Ç¿¡¼ ÀÚ¶ó´Â 3°³ Ȱ¿±¼öÀÇ »ý¸®Àû ¹ÝÀÀ
( Physiological Responses of the Three Deciduous Hardwood Seedlings Growing Under Different Shade Treatment Regimes ) |
| ±è±æ³²;Á¶¹Î¼®;À̼ö¿ø; Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ »ê¸²ÀÚ¿øÇÐ;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø »ê¸²»ý»ê±â¼ú¿¬±¸¼Ò;±¹¸³»ê¸²°úÇпø »ê¸²»ý»ê±â¼ú¿¬±¸¼Ò;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ÀÚÀÛ³ª¹«, °³º¢³ª¹«, ÇԹڲɳª¹«¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÇÀ½¼öÁØÀ» Àü±¤ 󸮱¸(»ó´ëÅõ±¤À²; 100%), ¾àÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸(»ó´ëÅõ±¤À²; 64~73%), º¸ÅëÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸ (»ó´ëÅõ±¤À²; 35~42%), °ÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸(»ó´ëÅõ±¤À²; 9~16%)·Î ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© À̵éÀÇ ³»À½¼º ¹× ±¤ ¿ä±¸µµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ±¤ÇÕ¼º Ư¼º°ú ¿±·Ï¼Ò Çü±¤ ¹ÝÀÀ, ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÇÔ·®À» Á¶»ç ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼¼ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ »ýÀ°½Ã±âº° ±¤ÇÕ¼º ´É·ÂÀº 7¿ù°ú 9¿ù¿¡ °¡Àå ³ôÀº °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³ÂÀ¸¸ç, ÀÚÀÛ³ª¹«¿Í °³º¢³ª¹«¿¡ ºñÇØ ÇԹڲɳª¹«ÀÇ ±¤ÇÕ¼º ´É·ÂÀÌ ¸Å¿ì ³·¾Ò´Ù. ¼ø¾çÀÚ¼öÀ² ¶ÇÇÑ ±¤ÇÕ¼º ´É·Â°ú °°Àº °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ¼ö¸ñÀdz»À½¼º ¼öÁØÀ» ÆÇ´ÜÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±¤º¸»óÁ¡Àº ÇԹڲɳª¹«°¡ ÀÚÀÛ³ª¹«¿Í °³º¢³ª¹«¿¡ ºñÇØ °ÇÑ ³»À½¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ÇÇÀ½ 󸮺° ±¤ÇÕ¼º ´É·Â¿¡¼´Â ÀÚÀÛ³ª¹«´Â Àü±¤ 󸮱¸¿¡¼ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °³º¢³ª¹«´Â ½Ã±âº° Â÷ÀÌ´Â ÀÖÁö¸¸ °ÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ³ª¸ÓÁö ¼¼ 󸮱¸¿¡¼ ºñ½ÁÇÑ ±¤ÇÕ¼º ´É·ÂÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ÇԹڲɳª¹«´Â º¸ ÅëÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸¿¡¼ °¡Àå ÁÁÀº ±¤ÇÕ¼º ´É·ÂÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ÇÇÀ½ 󸮺° ¿±·Ï¼Ò Çü±¤ ¹ÝÀÀ Ư¼º¿¡¼ ±¤ÈÇÐ ¹ÝÀÀ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ø¾çÀÚ¼öÀ²ÀÇ ÃÖ´ëÄ¡ÀÎ ±¤ÈÇÐÈ¿À²($F_v/F_m$)Àº ÀÚ ÀÛ³ª¹«ÀÇ °æ¿ì Àü±¤ 󸮱¸¿¡¼ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÇÇÀ½ ¼öÁØÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. °³º¢³ª¹«´Â ¾àÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸¿¡¼ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÑ ±¤ÈÇÐÈ¿À²À» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÇÔ¹Ú²É ³ª¹«´Â º¸ÅëÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸¿¡¼ °¡Àå ¾çÈ£ÇÑ ±¤ÈÇÐÈ¿À²À» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ÇԹڲɳª¹«´Â ´Ù¸¥ µÎ ¼öÁ¾°ú´Â ´Þ¸® Àü±¤ 󸮱¸¿¡¼ °¡Àå ³·Àº °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ÀÌ °á°ú´Â ¼¼ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ ÇÇÀ½ ¼öÁغ° ±¤ÇÕ¼º ´É·Â°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè´ë»ó ¼öÁ¾µéÀÇ ÃÑ ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÇÔ·®Àº ¼¼ ¼öÁ¾ ¸ðµÎ ÇÇÀ½ ¼öÁØÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ƯÈ÷ Àü±¤ 󸮱¸¿¡ ºñÇØ¼ °ÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸¿¡¼ ÃÑ ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÇÔ·®ÀÌ À¯ÀÇÀû Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌ¸é¼ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿±·Ï¼Ò a¿Í b °¢°¢ÀÇ ÇÔ·® º¯Èµµ ÃÑ ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÇÔ·®°ú °°Àº °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. ÇÇÀ½ ¼öÁØÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö¸é¼ ¿±·Ï¼Ò bÀÇ ÇÔ·® Áõ°¡°¡ ¿±·Ï¼Ò aÀÇ ÇÔ·®¿¡ ºñÇØ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ´õ Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥ ÀÌ ¶§¹®¿¡ ÇÇÀ½ °µµ°¡ °ÇØÁö¸é¼ ¿±·Ï¼Ò a/bÀ²ÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. À§ÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇØ º¼ ¶§ ¼¼ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ ÀûÁ¤ »ýÀ° ±¤µµ´Â ÀÚÀÛ³ª¹«´Â Àü±¤ 󸮱¸(»ó´ëÅõ±¤À²; 100%), °³ º¢³ª¹«´Â ¾àÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸(»ó´ëÅõ±¤À²; 64~73%), ÇÔ¹Ú²É ³ª¹«´Â º¸ÅëÇÇÀ½ 󸮱¸(»ó´ëÅõ±¤À²; 35~42%)°¡ ÀûÇÕ ÇÏ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ¼ö¸ñÀÇ »ýÀ°¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ ±¤µµ»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ¿Âµµ, ½Àµµ, Åä¾çȯ°æ, °æÀï½Ä»ý µî ¿©·¯ °¡Áö ´Ù¾çÇÑ È¯°æÀÎÀÚ°¡ °ü¿©Çϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ±¤µµ º¯È¿Í ¿¬°èÇÑ º¸´Ù ¸¹Àº ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. |
|
| This present study was conducted to investigate photosynthetic characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence, chlorophyll contents of Betula platyphylla var. japonica, Prunus leveilleana, Magnolia sieboldii, growing under four different light intensity regimes (full sun, and 64~73%, 35~42%, 9~16% of full sun). As result, Betula platyphylla var. japonica showed outstanding photosynthetic capacity and apparent quantum yield in full sun and showed low shade tolerance. Prunus leveilleana showed good photosynthetic capacity and apparent quantum yield in 64~73% or 35~42% of full sun and showed common shade tolerance. However, Magnolia sieboldii showed good photosynthetic capacity and apparent quantum yield in 35~42% of full sun, while the lowest in full sun. Magnolia sieboldii showed the highest shade tolerance compared to the other species. As the shading level increased, the total chlorophyll contents of all species increased with significant difference. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ±¤ÇÕ¼º;±¤ÈÇÐÈ¿À²;³»À½¼º;¿±·Ï¼Ò;ÇÇÀ½ ó¸®;chlorophyll fluorescence;chlorophyll contents;photosynthetic capacity;shade tolerance; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.1, 2010³â, pp.36-48
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201019451498325)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|