¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.18, no.4, 2009³â, pp.492-501
Fuji'/M.9 »ç°ú³ª¹«¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ¼¼À广ÃßÇüÀÇ ¼ö°í°¡ ¿µ¾ç»ýÀå, »ý»ê¼º ¹× ³ëµ¿·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Influence of Tree Height on Vegetative Growth, Productivity, and Labour in Slender Spindle of 'Fuji'/M.9 Apple Trees )
¾ç»óÁø;¹Ú¹«¿ë;¼Û¾çÀÍ;»ç°øµ¿ÈÆ;À±Å¸í; ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø »ç°ú½ÃÇèÀå;±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø »ç°ú½ÃÇèÀå;±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø »ç°ú½ÃÇèÀå;±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø »ç°ú½ÃÇèÀå;°æºÏ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Àç½Ä°Å¸® $3.2{ imes}1.2m$·Î ½É¾î ¼ö°í 2.5mÀÇ ¼¼À广ÃßÇüÀ¸·Î °ü¸®ÇØ ¿À´ø 'ÈÄÁö'/M.9 »ç°ú³ª¹«¸¦ Àç½Ä 6³âÂ÷ºÎÅÍ 2³â µ¿¾È ¼ö°í 4.0m·Î °ü¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌÈÄ Àç½Ä 8³âÂ÷¿¡ ¼ö°í¸¦ 2.5m(´ëÁ¶±¸), 3.0m, 3.5m, 4.0m·Î Á¶ÀýÇÏ°í ¼ö°í¿¡ µû¸¥ 2³â°£ÀÇ »ý»ê¼º ¹× ³ëµ¿·ÂÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ëÁ¶±¸ÀÎ ¼ö°í 2.5m¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© 󸮿¡ µû¸¥ 10a´ç »ý»ê·®À» ºñ±³ÇØ º¸¸é Ã¹ÇØ¿¡´Â ¼ö°í 4.0m, 3.5m, 3.0m¿¡¼­ °¢°¢ 46%, 25%, 4%, 2³âÂ÷¿¡´Â 17%, 12%, 10% Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö°í¿¡ µû¸¥ °ú½Ç ǰÁú¿¡ À־´Â °¡¿ë¼º °íÇü¹° ÇÔ·®Àº 2°³³â ¸ðµÎ ¼ö°í 2.5m°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª, Âø»öÁ¤µµ´Â ¼ö°í¿¡ µû¸¥ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ³ëµ¿·ÂÀº ¼ö°í°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁú¼ö·Ï Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ³ëµ¿·Â¿¡ µû¸¥ °ú½Ç»ý»ê·®Àº ¼ö°í°¡ ³·À»¼ö·Ï Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶¼öÀÔ°ú ¼ø¼öÀÔÀº 2005³âÀÇ °æ¿ì ¼ö°í°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁú¼ö·Ï Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, 2006³âÀº ¼ö°í 2.5m°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÁö¸¸ Åë°èÀû À¯ÀÇÂ÷´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¼ö°í¿¡ µû¸¥ »ý»ê¼º, ³ëµ¿·Â, °æÁ¦¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇØ º¼¶§ ÀûÁ¤¼ö°í´Â 3.0~3.5mÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù.
This study was carried out to investigate influence of tree height on vegetable growth, productivity, and labor input in 5 year old slender spindle 'Fuji'/M.9 apple trees planted with the tree space of $3.2{ imes}1.2m$ and trained to the tree height of 2.5m in the apple orchard of Apple Research Station, NIHHS, RDA in Gunwi County, Korea. Tree height was extended to the tree height of 4.0m for two years. And then, the tree height was restricted to 2.5 (control), 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0m in 8th year. Yield per 10a was 46, 25, and 4% higher at the tree height of 4.0, 3.5, and 3.0m than at the tree height of 2.5m respectively in first year and 17, 12, and 10% higher respectively, indicating the taller tree, the higher yield. Soluble solid contents was highest in the height of 2.5m than in any other treatments for 2 years, but fruit skin color was not clear. Labor input was increased parallel with the increase of tree height, but yield per labor input was decreased. Gross income and net income per 10a were increased parallel with the increase of tree height in first year, but not increased in second year. In considering production, labor input, and economic efficiency, the optimum tree height of slender spindle 'Fuji'/M.9 apple planted with the tree space of $3.2{ imes}1.2m$ was presumed to be 3.0~3.5m.
 
Ű¿öµå
°æÁ¦¼º;°ú½ÇǰÁú;±¤Åõ°ú;¼ö°ü¿ëÀû;economic efficiency;fruit quality;light penetration;tree canopy;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.4, 2009³â, pp.492-501
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200914035211945)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿