|
|
|
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.18, no.4, 2009³â, pp.370-376
|
Æó¼âÇü À°¹¦½Ã¼³ ³»¿¡¼ ¸î °¡Áö ±¤¿øÀÌ Å丶Åä¿Í ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ ¹¦¼ÒÁú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effects of Selective Light Sources on Seedling Quality of Tomato and Cucumber in Closed Nursery System ) |
| ¾ö¿µÃ¶;ÀåÀ±¾Æ;ÀÌÁر¸;±è½ÂÀ¯;Á¤½Â·æ;¿À»ó¼®;Â÷¼±È;È«¼ºÃ¢; ³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ä¼Ò°ú;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ä¼Ò°ú;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ä¼Ò°ú;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ä¼Ò°ú;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ä¼Ò°ú;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ä¼Ò°ú;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ä¼Ò°ú;³óÃÌÁøÈïû ±¹¸³³ó¾÷°úÇпø ±âÈĺ¯È»ýŰú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| Æó¼âÇü À°¹¦½Ã¼³ ³»¿¡¼ ±ÕÀÏÇÑ Ç°ÁúÀÇ Ç÷¯±×¹¦¸¦ ÁÖ³âÀ¸·Î »ý»êÇÔ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ LED ±¤¿øÀÇ ÀÌ¿ë °¡´É¼ºÀ» °ËÅäÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿©, Å丶Åä¿Í ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ À°¹¦±â°£ µ¿¾È¿¡ ±¤¿øÀ» ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© ¹¦¼ÒÁúÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àû»ö, û»ö, È¥ÇÕ(Àû»ö 2 + û»ö 1) LED ¹× Çü±¤µîÀ» $40{sim}60{mu}mol{cdot}m^{-2}{cdot}s^{-1}$·Î ±¤µµ(PPF)¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿© 30Àϰ£ ¿ÂµµÁ¶ÀýÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ Æó¼âÇü À°¹¦½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡¼ À°¹¦ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Å丶Åä¿Í ¿ÀÀÌ ¸ðµÎ Çü±¤µî¿¡ ºñÇØ Àû»ö LED¿Í È¥ÇÕ LED 󸮿¡¼ ¹èÃàÀÇ ½ÅÀåÀÌ ÀÛÀ¸¸é¼ ưưÇÑ ¹¦À» »ý»êÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Å丶Åä¿Í ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ »ýüÁßÀº Àû»ö LED¿¡¼ °¡Àå ¹«°Å¿ü´Âµ¥ Çü±¤µî¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© °¢°¢ 74% Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Å丶ÅäÀÇ 1ȹæ Âø°úÀýÀ§¿¡¼´Â 󸮰£¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, 2ȹæÀÇ Âø°úÀýÀ§´Â È¥ÇÕ±¤ 󸮿¡¼ ³·¾Ò´Ù. ȹ溰 ÂøÈ¼ö´Â 󸮰£¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ 20Àý±îÁöÀÇ ¾Ï²É Âø»ý·üÀº Àû»ö LED 󸮿¡¼ 52%·Î °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í, ´ÙÀ½ÀÌ È¥ÇÕ±¤ 󸮷μ 44%¿´´Ù. °ú½Ç Âø°ú¼ö¿Í ¼ö·®Àº 󸮰£¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú·ÎºÎÅÍ Æó¼âÇü À°¹¦½Ã¼³ ³»¿¡¼ Å丶Åä¿Í ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ ¹¦»ý»ê¿¡´Â Àû»ö ¹× Àû»ö 2 +û»ö 1ÀÇ È¥ÇÕ LED°¡ ÀÌ¿ë °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ³ôÀº °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
|
| To produce uniform seedlings of tomato and cucumber with inexpensive way, their seedling quality by different light sources was investigated. The raising of seedling was performed by red LED (light emitting diodes), blue LED, red-blue mixed LED or fluorescent light with a fixed PPF(photosynthetic proton flux) level, about $40{sim}60{mu}mol{cdot}m^{-2}{cdot}sec^{-1}$. In the both tomato and cucumber, the rapid extension of hypocotyledonary axis was observed in Blue LED than fluorescent light, but opposite result was found in Red and mixed LED. During the nursery period of tomato and cucumber, the fresh weight was the highest in Red LED as 74% increasement in tomato and 74% in cucumber. In the case of seedling quality after the tomato nursery, there was no difference in the positions of 1st flower cluster and the number of bearing-flower per flower cluster by each light source. In case of cucumber, until 20th node, the setting ratio of female flower was higher in LED than fluorescent treatment, and also more healthy fruit setting was found in LED. Therefore, we assume that the Red or mixed (Red 2 + Blue 1) LED is more favorable to produce high quality tomato and cucumber seedlings in closed nursery facility. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ±¤Áú;¿ÀÀÌ;Å丶Åä;Æó¼âÇü ½Ä¹°°øÀå;Ç÷¯±×¹¦;closed plant factory;cucumber;LED;light quality;seedlings;tomato; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.4, 2009³â, pp.370-376
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200914035211838)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|