¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.18, no.4, 2009³â, pp.401-407
DiniconazolÀÇ Ã³¸® ½Ã±â ¹× ³óµµ°¡ Å丶Åä ¹¦ÀÇ µµÀå¾ïÁ¦¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effect of Diniconazol Treatment on the Inhibition of Over-Growth of Tomato Seedlings )
¼±Àº¼±;°­È£¹Î;±è¿µ½Ä;±èÀϼ·; °­¿ø´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;»ó¸í´ëÇб³ ½Ä¹°»ê¾÷°øÇаú;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Å丶ÅäÀÇ µµÀå ¾ïÁ¦¸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀÎ °Ç¹¦¸¦ »ý»êÇϰíÀÚ À°¹¦ ±â°£ Áß diniconazol 󸮽ñâ 󸮳󵵿¡ µû¸¥ °æ¿±Ã³¸®¿Í ħÁö ½Ã°£¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¾ÀÚ󸮰¡ ¹¦ µµÀå ¾ïÁ¦¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°í ÀûÁ¤ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ±¸¸íÇϰíÀÚ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Diniconazol ó¸®½Ã±â ¹× ó¸®³óµµ¿¡ µû¸¥ Å丶ÅäÀÇ ÃÊÀå ½ÅÀåÀ» º» °á°ú 1´Ü°è 2´Ü°è 3´Ü°è·Î ÃÊÀåÀÇ ½ÅÀå°ú Àý°£Àå ¾ïÁ¦°¡ Àß ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌ´Â À̸¥ ½Ã±â°¡ ´ÊÀº ½Ã±âº¸´Ù ½Ä¹°Ã¼°¡ ¹Þ´Â ¾àÁ¦ÀÇ ¾çÀÌ ´õ ¸¹±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ¾àÁ¦ È¿°ú°¡ Àß ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 1´Ü°è´Â 4Àý, 2´Ü°è, 3´Ü°è´Â °¢°¢ 3Àý, 2Àý·Î ¾ïÁ¦µÈ Àý°£¼ö°¡ ÁÙ¾îµé¾ú´Ù. ¾àÁ¦ Áö¼Ó¼ºÀÌ ÃÊÀåÀÇ ½ÅÀå¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» º» °á°ú 1´Ü°è, 2´Ü°è $5mg{cdot}L^{-1}$Àº ¾àÁ¦ ó¸® ÈÄ ÃÊÀåÀÇ ½ÅÀå¾ïÁ¦°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª ´Ù¸¥ 󸮱¸¿¡ ºñÇØ ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áö³ª¸é »¡¸® ȸº¹ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 3´Ü°è¿¡¼­´Â ÃÊÀå ½ÅÀå ¾ïÁ¦ ±â°£ÀÌ Âª¾Ò°í ºü¸¥ ȸº¹À» º¸¿´´Ù. 1´Ü°è´Â 5ÁÖ, 2´Ü°è, 3´Ü°è´Â °¢°¢ 4ÁÖÁ¤µµ ¾àÁ¦ Áö¼ÓÈ¿°ú°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À°¹¦ Á¾·á ÈÄ Á¤½ÄÇÑ °á°ú »ýü·®ÀÌ »¡¸® Áõ°¡ µÇ¾î »ýÀ°¿¡´Â ¹«Ã³¸®¿Í À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
This study intends to examine the influence of foliage treatment and seed treatment on the suppression of the succulent growth of tomato seedlings, and further, to clarify the proper way of suppressing the succulent growth of tomatoes. For the foliage treatment, the time and the concentration of diniconazol treatment were considered, and for the seed treatment, the soaking time was considered. As a result of examining the stem elongation of tomatoes based on the time and the concentration of diniconazol treatment, suppression of stem elongation and internodal length was found in step 1, 2, and 3. Plants absorb more quantity of a chemical when they are young, so a good chemical effect was found. In step 1, the number of suppressed nodes was 4, which was decreased to 3 in step 2 and to 2 in step 3. As a result of examining the influence of chemical tenacity on stem elongation, $5;mg{cdot}L^{-1}$ in step 1 and 2 showed the suppression of stem elongation after chemical treatment, but it became recovered fast after a particular time, compared with others. In step 3, the period of stem elongation suppression was short and they were recovered fast. In step 1, the effect of chemical tenacity was found for 5 weeks, but in step 2 and 3, it lasted for 4 weeks respectively. After raising seedlings was finished, they got planted and the quantity of living bodies increased fast so there was no significant difference in breeding from non-treatment.
 
Ű¿öµå
°æ¿±Ã³¸®;½ÅÀå¾ïÁ¦;À°¹¦;Á¾ÀÚó¸®;diniconazol;foliage treatment;seedling;succulent growth;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.18, no.4, 2009³â, pp.401-407
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200914035211917)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿