¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.8, no.2, 1999³â, pp.90-98
¹èÁöÀÇ Á¾·ù¿Í ¹è¾ç¾×³óµµ°¡ ¹é¸®Çâ(Thymus vulgaris L.)ÀÇ »ýÀ°¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effects of Nutrient Solution Concentration and Substrate on the Growth of Common Thyme(Thymus vulgaris L.) )
±è¿¹Èñ;À̹®Á¤;¹Ú±Ç¿ì; °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹°úÇаú;°í·Á´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹°úÇаú;°í·Á´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹°úÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¾ç¾×Àç¹è½Ã ÀûÇÕÇÑ ¹èÁö¿Í ¹è¾ç¾×³óµµ¸¦ ¼±¹ßÇϰíÀÚ º» ½ÇÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °ø½ÃÀÛ¹°Àº ¹é¸®Çâ(Thymus vulgaris L.)À¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ ³óµµ´Â European Vegetable R&D Center¿¡¼­ °³¹ßÇÑ herb ¹è¾ç¾×(EC=2.4)À» 0.5, 1, 2, 3¹è·Î Á¶Á¦ÇÏ¿© »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹èÁö´Â °íÇü¹èÁö·Î ÆÞ¶óÀÌÆ® ´Ü¿ë, ÄÚÄÚÇÇÆ® ´Ü¿ë ±×¸®°í ÆÞ¶óÀÌÆ®¿Í ÄÚÄÚÇÇÆ® È¥¿ë(50:50 v/v)À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´°í, ºñ°íÇü¹èÁö·Î´Â DFT¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃÑ 4󸮷ΠÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ýÀ°Àº ´Ù¸¥ ¹èÁö 󸮱¸º¸´Ù ´ã¾×¼ö°æ¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ÁÁ¾Ò´Ù. ÆÞ¶óÀÌÆ®¿Í ´ã¾×¼ö°æ¿¡¼­´Â ¹è¾ç¾×³óµµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï »ýÀ°ÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´À¸³ª ÄÚÄÚÇÇÆ®´Â 1¹è, È¥¿ë ¹èÁö´Â 2¹è 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ôÀº »ýüÁßÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¿±·Ï¼Ò¿Í ºñŸ¹Î CÀÇ ÇÔ·® ¶ÇÇÑ ´Ù¸¥ ¹èÁö 󸮱¸º¸´Ù ´ã¾×¼ö°æ¿¡¼­ ´õ ³ôÀº ÇÔ·®À» º¸¿´´Ù. ¹èÁöÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ ¹«±â¹° ÇÔ·®Àº NO$_{3}$-N°ú Mg¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÏ°í ¸ðµÎ ÄÚÄÚÇÇÆ®¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ôÀº ÇÔ·®À» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. NO$_{3}$-NÀÇ ÇÔ·®Àº ´ã¾× ¼ö°æ¿¡¼­ 1000 ppm ³»¿ÜÀÇ ³·Àº ÇÔ·®À» º¸¿´´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ º» ½ÇÇèÀÇ °á°ú, ¹é¸®ÇâÀÇ »ýÀ°Àº DFT¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© herb¹è¾ç¾× 0.5¹è(EC =1.2mS/cm)³óµµ·Î Àç¹èÇÑ Ã³¸®±¸¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ÁÁÀº »ýÀ°À» º¸¿´´Ù.
This study was conducted to select proper substrate and nutrient solution concentration for favorable growth and quality in common thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). The growth of common thyme was better in deep flow culture (DFT) than in other substrate cultures. As the nutrient solution concentration rose, the ratio of dry matter increased, while the fresh weight and the number of lateral shoots decreased. The contents of total chlorophyll and vitamin C were higher in DFT than others. Ca, K, P were showed high contents in cocopeat, but Mg content was the highest at half-fold concentration in DFT. Common thyme showed low content of nitrate in DFT compared with that in other substrate culture. DFT was the most effective system for pronoting growth and quality of common thyme. The optimal concentration of nutrient solution in common thyme was half-fold(EC=1.2mS/cm) of herbs nutrient solution by European Vegetable R&D Center.
 
Ű¿öµå
°Ç¹°·ü;´ã¾×¼ö°æ;ºñŸ¹Î C;Çãºê;DFT;dry matter;vitamin c;herb;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.8, no.2, 1999³â, pp.90-98
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199911922406586)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿