¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.9, no.2, 2000³â, pp.120-126
´Üµ¿ Ç¥°íÀç¹è½Ã¼³ÀÇ ÃµÃ¢¸éÀû°ú Â÷±¤À²¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿Âµµ ¹× ȯ±âƯ¼º
( Thermal and Ventilative Characteristics of Single-Span Oak Mushroom Production Facility as Affected by Area of Roof Opening and Shading Rates )
¼ÕÁ¤ÀÍ; ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ½Ä¹°»ý»ê°úÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Ç¥°í¹ö¼¸(Lentinus edodes(Berk) Sing)ÀÇ Ç°ÁúÀº ȯ°æÁ¶°Ç¿¡ ¸Å¿ì ¹Î°¨Çϰí, ƯÈ÷ »ý»ê±â°£ÁßÀÇ °­¿ì¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¼öºÐÀÇ ¿µÇâÀÌ Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖ´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ °æ¿ì, Ç¥°í¹ö¼¸ÀÌ °­¿ì¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© Á¥Áö ¾Êµµ·Ï Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿©, °­¿ìÂ÷´Ü¿ë ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½ Çʸ§À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ̢̿ ȯ±â±¸ À̿ܿ¡´Â ¸ðµÎ ¹ÐÆó½ÃŲ Àç¹è½Ã¼³À» »ç¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ ÃµÃ¢ÀÌ ¾ø´Â Àç¹è½Ã¼³ÀÇ ½Ç³»¿Âµµ¿Í ½Àµµ´Â ºÒ·®ÇÑ È¯±â·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© »ó½ÂÇÏ°Ô µÇ°í, °á±¹ »ý»ê¼º ¹× ǰÁúÀ» ¶³¾î¶ß¸®°Ô µÈ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °³¼±µÈ Ç¥°íÀç¹è½Ã¼³ÀÇ ÃµÃ¢ ¸éÀû°ú Â÷±¤À²¿¡ µû¸¥ ȯ±âÀ² ¹× ½Ç³»¿Âµµ º¯È­¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Â÷±¤À²ÀÌ 50%¿¡¼­ 90%·Î Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ¿Âµµ´Â ¾à 2.5$^{circ}C$ ÀÌ»óÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³ÂÀ¸¸ç 50%ÀÇ ³·Àº Â÷±¤À²¿¡¼­ dz¼ÓÀÇ ¿µÇâÀÌ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ȯ±âÀ²Àº dz¼Ó 1~2m.s-1 À̻󿡼­´Â Â÷±¤À²¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ Å©°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½Ç¿Üdz¼ÓÀÌ 0m.s-1¿¡¼­ 2m.s-1·Î Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ½Ç³»¿Âµµ´Â ¾à 2$^{circ}C$ÀÌ»ó Çϰ­ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ƯÈ÷, õâ°³µµ°¡ Ä¿Áú¼ö·Ï ¿Âµµ°¡ Çϰ­ÇÏ¿´Áö¸¸ °³µµ 50%À̻󿡼­´Â Å« Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. Â÷±¤À²ÀÌ ³·À»¼ö·Ï °³µµ Áõ°¡°¡ ¿ÂµµÇϰ­¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀÌ ¶Ñ·ÈÇÏ¿´´Ù. dz¼Ó ¹× Â÷±¤À²¿¡ ¹«°üÇÏ°Ô ÃµÃ¢¸éÀû°ú ̢̿¸éÀûÀÌ °ÅÀÇ µ¿ÀÏÇÒ ¶§, ³ôÀº ȯ±âÈ¿À² ¹× ¿ÂµµÇϰ­ Ư¼ºÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
The quality of oak mushoom(Lentinus edodes(Berk) Sing) is sensitively affected by environmental factors, especially moisture by the rain during the growing period. To protect mushrooms from being wet, plastic-covered facilities with side openings are mostly being used. However, the indoor temperature and humidity f the facility without roof opening become higher due to its poor ventilation, and consequently reduce the productivity and quality as well. In this study, we analyzed the ventilation rates and indoor temperatures of improved facilities as affected by the area of roof opening and shading rate by the model. The indoor temperature decreased by more than 2.5$^{circ}C$ as the shading rate increased from 50% to 90%, and especially the effect of wind speed on indoor temperature was significantly great under as low as 50% of shading rate. The ventilation rate became higher under wind speed of 1~2m.s-1 regardless of the shading rate. As the wind speed increased from 0m.s-1 to 2m.s-1, the indoor temperature decreased by more than 2.$0^{circ}C$. Moreover, the indoor temperature became lower with increasing roof opening ratio, but showed no significant differences at more than 50% of roof opening ratio. At lower shading rate, the indoor temperature sensitively decreased with increasing area of roof opening. Additionally, we obtained the higher ventilation performance with the area of roof opening more or less equal to side opening, regardless of the wind speed and shading rate.
 
Ű¿öµå
Â÷±¤·ü;õâ¸éÀû;½Ç³»¿Âµµ;ȯ±âÀ²;Æ÷°í¹ö¼¸;shading rate;area of roof opening;indoor temperature;ventilation rate;Lentinus edodes(Beak) Sing;oak mushroom;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.9, no.2, 2000³â, pp.120-126
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200011919961593)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿