¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.9, no.3, 2000³â, pp.161-165
CEM BIO Film ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³ÀÇ È¯°æÆ¯¼º°ú Dz°íÃß »ýÀ°
( Greenhouse Environment and Growth of Green Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) in Greenhouse Covered with CEM BIO Film )
ÀüÈñ;±è°æÁ¦;±Ç¿µ»ï;±èÇöȯ;À̽ÿµ; ¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ½Ã¼³Àç¹è°ú;µ¿±¹´ëÇб³ ½Ä¹°ÀÚ¿øÇаú;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ½Ã¼³Àç¹è°ú;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ½Ã¼³Àç¹è°ú;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ½Ã¼³Àç¹è°ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
CEM BIO P.E.Çʸ§À¸·Î ÇǺ¹µÈ ½Ã¼³¿¡¼­ 300~1,100nm »çÀÌÀÇ ºÐ±¤Åõ°úÀ²Àº ÀÏ¹Ý P.E. Çʸ§À¸·Î ÇǺ¹µÈ ½Ã¼³º¸´Ù ³ô¾Ò´Ù. Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ½Ã¼³³» ±¤Åõ°úÀ²Àº ÀÌÁßÇǺ¹, °ñÁ¶, ±âŸ½Ã¼³¹° ¶§¹®¿¡ ³ëÁö¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Àý¹Ý ¼öÁØÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ¼øº¹»ç·®Àº CEM BIO P.E. Çʸ§ ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³ÀÌ 5,424.5W.m$^{-2}$ ·Î¼­ ÀÏ¹Ý P.E.Çʸ§ ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³º¸´Ù 2.9% ³·¾Ò°í, ±¤ÇÕ¼ºÀ¯È¿º¹»ç Åõ°úÀ²Àº CEM BIO P.E.Çʸ§ ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³ÀÌ 3,861.2W.n$^{-2}$ ·Î¼­ ÀÏ¹Ý P.E. Çʸ§ ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³º¸´Ù 3.8% ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ¹«°¡¿Â±âÀÇ Àû»êÃÖÀú¿Âµµ´Â CEM BIO P.E. Çʸ§ ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³ÀÌ ÀÏ¹Ý P.E. Çʸ§ ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³º¸´Ù 1ÀÏ Æò±Õ 0.35$^{circ}C$ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. Á¤½ÄÈÄ 30ÀÏÀÇ Ç²°íÃß »ýÀ°Àº CEM BIO P.E. Çʸ§ ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³¿¡¼­ ÃÊÀå, °æ°æ, ¿±¸éÀû, »ýüÁß, °Ç¹°Áß ¹× ±º¶ô»ý»ê±¸Á¶°¡ ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´°í, °ú½ÇÀº °úÁßÀÌ 11.28gÀ¸·Î ÀÏ¹Ý P.E. Çʸ§ ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³ º¸´Ù 1.25g ¹«°Å¿üÀ¸¸ç, »óǰÀ²Àº 2.7% ³ô¾Ò´Ù. 1997³â 11¿ù 19ÀϺÎÅÍ 1998³â 3¿ù 3ÀÏ »çÀÌÀÇ ¼ö·®Àº CEM BIO P.E. Çʸ§ÇǺ¹½Ã¼³¿¡¼­ 7.4% ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸³ª ÀüüÀûÀÎ ¼ö·®Àº Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
Spectroradiometric light transmittance from 300 to 1,100nm in the greenhouse covered with the CEM BIO polyethylene film was greater than that in the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film (control). As a whole, solar radiation transmittance into greenhouse was a half level, due to shades caused by double layer covering, frame and equipment. Net radiation energy emitted throughout surface of the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film was 5,424.5W.m$^{-2}$ , which was lower by 2.9% as compared to that of the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film. Photosynthetically active radiation from 400 to 700nm of the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film was 3,861.2W.m$^{-2}$ , which was higher by 3.8% as compared to hat of the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film. Accumulated minimum air temperature from Oct. 7, 1997 to Oct. 16, 1997 of the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film was 100.5$^{circ}C$, which was higher by 2.5$^{circ}C$ as compared to that of the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film. As results, height, stem diameter, leaf count, leaf area, fresh weight and dry weight of green pepper plants and canopy production structure measured at 30 days after transplanting were enhanced. Mean fruit weight n the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film was 11.28 g and 1.25 g greater as compared to that in the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film, due to increased fruit diameter and flesh thickness. Percent marketable fruits produced in the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film were 96.1%, and was greater by 2.7% thant that of the greenhouse covered with polyethylnee film due to decreased infection, sterility, severe curve and twisted fruits. The green pepper yield of the greenhouse covered with CEM BIO polyethylene film from Nov. 19, 1997 to Feb. 3, 1998 was greater by 974 kg per hectare than that of the greenhouse covered with polyethylene film, but the total fruit had no difference.
 
Ű¿öµå
±¤ÇÕ¼ºÀ¯È¿º¹»ç;Æú¸®¿¡Æ¿·»Çʸ§;photosynthetically active radiation;polyethylene film;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.9, no.3, 2000³â, pp.161-165
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200011920846094)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿