¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.15, no.4, 2006³â, pp.400-405
Æä¾ç¾×À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °üºñÀç¹è°¡ ¸Ó½ºÅ© ¸á·Ð°ú ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ »ýÀ°¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effect of Using Waste Nutrient Solution Fertigation on the Musk Melon and Cucumber Growth )
À强ȣ;°­È£¹Î;±èÀϼ·; ³óÃÌÁøÈïû ¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ä¼Ò°ú;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;°­¿ø´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
»ýÀ°½Ã±âº° ¸á·ÐÀÇ ºñ¼øÈ¯½Ä ¼ö°æÀç¹è Æó¾ç¾×Àº $NO_3$-N¿Í Ca ¹× K ÇÔ·® µî ¾çÀ̿ ÇÔ·®ÀÌ ³ô¾Ò°í, ¹Ý´ë·Î À½ÀÌ¿ÂÀº ¾à°£ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. pH´Â 5.7$sim$7.0 »çÀ̸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ¿´°í, EC´Â ¸á·ÐÀº 2.0$sim$2.2 $dS{cdot}m^{-1}$ »çÀ̸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æó¾ç¾×À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °üºñÀç¹è¿¡¼­ ¸á·Ð ½Ä¹°ÀÇ ÃÊÀå, ±ÙÀå, ±×¸®°í ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÇÔ·®ÀÌ °üºñÀç¹è¿¡¼­ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °úÁßµµ 417.1g ´õ ¹«°Å¿üÀ¸¸ç °ú½ÇÀÇ $^{circ}Brix$´çµµ´Â °üºñÀç¹è°¡ $13.3^{circ}Brix$·Î $1.4^{circ}Brix$´õ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¿ÀÀÌ¿¡¼­´Â ¿ÀÀ̽ŰÀÇ »ýÀ°¿¡´Â Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç °ú½ÇÀÇ Å©±âµµ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ´Â Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª °üºñÀç¹è°¡ ¼ö°æÀç¹è¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ÃѼö·®°ú »óǰ°úÀ²¿¡¼­ ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´´Ù.
Waste nutrient solution(WNS) using non-recycled hydroponics for melon increased contents of $NO_3$-N and cataions, such as, Ca, K, while anions except $NO_3$-N were decreased slightly as the musk melon plants grew. pH and EC of WNS were maintained 5.7$sim$7.0, 2.0$sim$2.2 $dS{cdot}m^{-1}$, respectively. The musk melon plants cultivated by fertigation using WNS showed longer plant height and root length, and higher chlorophyll content than that grown by hydroponics. The fruit weight of musk melon grown by fertigation using WNS were 417.1 g heavier than that cultivated by hydroponics and soluble solids contents of musk melon fruit cultivated by fertigation using WNS was $13.3^{circ}Brix$, that was $1.4^{circ}Brix$ higher than that grown by hydroponics. While the growth of cucumber plants and size of cucumber fruits were not different between in fertigation using WNS and hydroponics, total yields and marketable fruit percentage showed more in fertigation using WNS than in hydroponics.
 
Ű¿öµå
ºñ¼øÈ¯½Ä ¼ö°æÀç¹è;ÃѼö·®;»óǰ°úÀ²;EC;non-recycled hydroponics;pH;total yields and marketable fruit percentage;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.15, no.4, 2006³â, pp.400-405
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200608506271364)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿