¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.16, no.3, 2007³â, pp.258-263
ÈÄÁö' »ç°ú³ª¹« ¼¼À广ÃßÇü¿¡¼­ ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö°¡ ¼öü»ýÀ°¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Enfluence of the Number of the Lower Scaffold Limbs in Slender Spindle Form on the Tree Growth and Development of 'Fuji' Apple Trees )
¹Ú¹«¿ë;¾ç»óÁø;¹ÚÁ¤°ü;ÃÖµ¿±Ù;°­ÀαÔ; ¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò »ç°ú½ÃÇèÀå;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò »ç°ú½ÃÇèÀå;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò °ú¼ö°ú;ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;»óÁÖ´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÈÄÁö'/M.9¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼¼À广ÃßÇü¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö ±¸¼ºÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö¸¦ ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© ¼öü»ýÀ°, ±¤È¯°æ, ¼ö·® ¹× °ú½ÇǰÁúÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼öÁغ° »ýÀ°Àº ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö¸¦ 5°³·Î À¯ÁöÇßÀ» ¶§ ¼öÆøÀº ³Ð¾ú°í, ½ÅÃÊÀå ¹× Á¤´Ü½ÅÃÊÀåÀº Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö°üÀ§Ä¡º° ¼ö±¤·üÀº ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö°¡ 5°³ÀΠ󸮱¸¿¡¼­ ¼ö°ü»óºÎ(Áö»ó 150cm)¿Í ¼ö°üÁߺÎ(Áö»ó 100cm)¿¡¼­´Â ³ôÀº °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ÃÑ ´Ü°úÁö È­¾Æ¼ö´Â ÃøÁö¼ö¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, ¼ö°üÀ§Ä¡º°·Î º¸¸é ¼ö°üÇϺÎ(Áö»ó 120cm ÀÌÇÏ)¿¡¼­ ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö°¡ 5°³ 󸮿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, È­¾ÆÀÇ È¾°æµµ Ä¿Áö´Â °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. °ú½Ç¼ö·®Àº ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö°¡ 5°³¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í, °úÁßÀº ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö°¡ 5°³¿Í 8°³¿¡¼­ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. °ú½ÇƯ¼ºÀº °úÇüÁö¼ö, °æµµ, »êÇÔ·®, Hunter L, b°ªÀº ¼ö°üÀ§Ä¡¿Í ÃøÁö¼öÁØ¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª, °¡¿ë¼º°íÇü¹° ÇÔ·®Àº ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö°¡ 5°³ÀÏ ¶§ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. °ú½ÇÀÇ Âø»öµµ¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»´Â Hunter a°ªÀº ¼ö±¤·üÀÌ °¡Àå ³ôÀº ÇÏ´ÜÃøÁö¼ö¸¦ 5°³·Î À¯ÁöÇÑ Ã³¸®±¸¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
This study was carried out to investigate the effects of number of the lower scaffold limbs on tree growth, light penetration, fruit yield, and fruit quality in slender spindle in 6-year-old 'Fuji'/M.9 apple trees. With regard to the growth by the numbers of the lower scaffold limbs, the width of the tree was wide and the growth of new shoots was increased when the number of the lower scaffold limbs was five. Compare with other treatments, five lower scaffold limbs showed high light-interception on the upper (150 cm above the ground) and middle (100 cm above the ground) canopy. There was no difference in the total number of the flower buds of the spurs according to the number of scaffold limbs, but the number and cross section area of flower bud on the lower canopy (120 cm above the ground) were increased where the number of the lower scaffold limbs was five. Fruit yield was highest in the treated with five lower scaffold limbs and fruit weight tended to increase where the number of the lower scaffold limbs was five or eight. With regard to fruit quality, there showed no difference in fruit shape index, firmness, acid content, Hunter L and b value according to the location of canopy and the number of the lower scaffold limbs, but the content of soluble solids was highest treated with five lower scaffold limbs. Hunter a value indicating fruit color was found to be highest treated with five lower scaffold limbs whose light interception was highest.
 
Ű¿öµå
°ú½ÇǰÁú;¼ö±¤·®;ÃøÁö¼ö;¼ö¼¼;¼ö·®;fruit quality;light penetration;scaffold limbs;tree vigor;yield;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.16, no.3, 2007³â, pp.258-263
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200735836626878)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿