¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.16, no.4, 2007³â, pp.322-327
¼­³«µ¿°­ À¯¿ª Æò°­ÃµÀÇ ¼öÁú Ư¼º°ú ¿ë¼ö¿ø¿¡ µû¸¥ Å丶Åä ¹× ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ »ýÀ°
( Chemical Properties of Peunggang River and Effect of Irrigation Source on the Growth of Tomato and Cucumber )
ÀÌÇÑö;Á¶¸íȯ;À̽ÿµ;ÃÖ°æÀÌ;ÀÌÀçÇÑ; ¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ½Ã¼³¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ½Ã¼³¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ½Ã¼³¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ½Ã¼³¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ¿ø¿¹±âȹÁ¶Á¤°ú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¼­³«µ¿°­ À¯¿ª Æò°­ÃµÀÇ ¼öÁúÀ» ºÐ¼®Çϰí ÀÌ ÇÏõ¼öÀÇ ´ëü ¿ë¼ö¿øÀ¸·Î ÁöÇϼö³ª ºø¹°ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑÁö¸¦ °ËÅäÄÚÀÚ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. Æò°­ÃµÀÇ ¿° ³óµµ(EC)´Â °èÀý¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̰¡ ÄÇÀ¸¸ç °¥¼ö±âÀÎ 3¿ù${sim}$5¿ù¿¡´Â EC $3.22{sim}3.62dS{cdot}m^{-1}$·Î ¸Å¿ì ³ô¾Ò°í ¼º¼ö±âÀÎ 6¿ùºÎÅÍ Á¡Á¡ ³·¾ÆÁ® 9¿ù¿¡´Â EC $2.37dS{cdot}m^{-1}$±îÁö ³·¾ÆÁ³´Ù. ¿° ³óµµ(EC)´Ã Æò°­ÃµÀÇ À§Ä¡¿¡ µû¶ó ¸¹Àº Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿© »ó·ù´Â EC $0.71dS{cdot}m^{-1}$, Áß·ù´Â $2.38dS{cdot}m^{-1}$, ÇÏ·ù´Â $3.02dS{cdot}m^{-1}$¿´´Ù. ÃÊÀå, »ýüÁß, °Ç¹°Áß µî »ýÀ°ÀÌ Å丶Åä, ¿ÀÀÌ ¸ðµÎ ÇÏõ¼öº¸´Ù ºø¹°À̳ª ¼öµ¾¹°¿¡ ÁÁ¾Ò´Ù. Æò±Õ°úÁßÀº Å丶Åä´Â ¼öµ¾¹°ÀÌ °¡Àå ¹«°Å¿üÀ¸³ª ¿ÀÀ̴ ó¸®°£¿¡ À¯ÀÇÂ÷´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. Âø°ú¼ö´Â Å丶Åä, ¿ÀÀÌ ¸ðµÎ ÇÏõ¼ö°¡ °¡Àå Àû¾úÀ¸¸ç ºø¹°°ú ¼öµ¾¹°°£¿¡´Â Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¼ö·®Àº Å丶Åä¿¡¼­´Â ¼öµ¾¹°ÀÌ 10,594kg/10aÀ¸·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ºø¹°, ÇÏõ¼ö ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù. ¿ÀÀÌ´Â °¢°¢ ¼öµ¾¹°ÀÌ 11,826, ºø¹°ÀÌ 10855kg/10a·Î ÇÏõ¼öº¸´Ù 44,33%¸¹¾Ò´Ù. Å丶Åä °ú½ÇÀÇ Ç°Áú¿¡¼­ ´çµµ´Â ÇÏõ¼ö°¡ ´Ù¼Ò ³ôÀº °æÇâÀ̾úÀ¸³ª 󸮰£¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç ¹è²Å½âÀ½°úÀÇ ¹ß»ýÀº ÇÏõ¼ö°¡ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. T-N ¹× PÀÇ ÇÔ·®Àº Å丶Åä, ¿ÀÀÌ ¸ðµÎ 󸮰£¿¡ Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç Ca ÇÔ·®Àº Å丶Åä¿¡¼­´Â ÇÏõ¼öº¸´Ù ºø¹°À̳ª ¼öµ¾¹°ÀÌ ¸¹¾Ò°í ¿ÀÀÌ¿¡¼­µµ °°Àº °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. ¹Ý¸é Na ÇÔ·®Àº Ca¿Í ´Þ¸® ÇÏõ¼ö¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¿¡¼­ ¼­³«µ¿°­ À¯¿ªÀÇ ³ó¾÷ ¿ë¼ö¿øÀ¸·Î ÇÏõ¼ö ´ë½Å ÁöÇϼö³ª ºø¹°À» ÀÌ¿ëÇϸé Å丶Åä »ýÀ°¿¡ È¿°úÀûÀÏ °ÍÀ̶ó »ý°¢µÈ´Ù¿ÀÈÄ 6½Ã±îÁö ½ÃÇèÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ½ÃÇè°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. °ø½Ã½Ã·áÀÇ Á¶»ç·á¿øº°·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÑ È­ÇÐÀû¼ººÐ°ú °Ç¹°¼ÒÈ­À²Àº ´ëüÀûÀ¸·Î äÃëÀå¼Ò, ÃÊÁ¾, »ýÀ°´Ü°è ¹× ¿¹Ãë½Ã±â¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ä½Ä·®, ä½ÄºñÀ² ¹× ä½Ä¼øÀ§´Â ÃÊÁ¾ ¹× ¼öÁ¾¿¡ µû¶ó Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ¼¶À¯¼Ò¹°ÁúÀÇ ÇÔ·®ÀÌ ³·°í °Ç¹°¼ÒÈ­À²ÀÌ ³ôÀº Á¶»ç·á¸¦ ´õ Áñ°Ü ä½ÄÇÏ´Â ¾ç»óÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. °ø½ÃµÈ 25 ÃÊÁ¾ Áß perennial ryegrass, tall fescue, red clover ¼øÀ¸·Î Áñ°Ü ä½ÄÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¼Ò¸®ÀïÀ̰¡ °¡Àå ±âÈ£¼ºÀÌ ³·¾Ò´Ù. À¯ »ê¾ç (Saanen)Àº È­º»°ú¸ñÃÊ (33.3%) ¹× µÎ°ú¸ñÃÊ (25.7%)¸¦ ÃÑ 59.0% ä½ÄÇÏ¿´´ø ¹Ý¸é¿¡ ¼ö¿±Àº 19.6%, ÀâÃÊ´Â 15.9%, ¾ßÃÊ´Â 5.5%¸¦ ä½ÄÇÏ¿´´ø °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸¾Æ ä½Ä½À¼ºÀº ÃÊ·ùä½ÄÇü (grazer type)¿¡ ´õ °¡±î¿î °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. 0.98·Î ÃßÁ¤µÇ¾î µÎ Á¾ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ÇüÁúµé °£ÀÇ ³ôÀº À¯Àü»ó°üÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. CCCÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. °á°úÀûÀ¸·Î sucroseÀÇ ³óµµ°¡ ³ô°í, CCC¿Í ¾Ïó¸®ÀÇ ±«°æÇü¼ºÀÇ ÃËÁøÁ¶°Ç¿¡¼­ AGPaseÀÇ È°¼ºÀÌ ¾çÈ£ÇÔÀ» º¼ ¶§, AGPase°¡ starch ÇÕ¼º¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ¹°ÁúÀ̶ó´Â »ç½ÇÀÌ È®ÀεǾú´Ù. Æò±Õ 1.4/2.0Á¡(70%)À¸·Î °¡Àå ³·°Ô Æò°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 'ÀûÁ¤ °Ë»ç½Ã¼³ ¹× ±â±¸ ±¸ºñ' Ç׸ñÀº °ø»êǰ¿¡¼­ Æò±Õ 0.2Á¡À¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾î Ÿǰ¸ñ¿¡ ºñÇØ ÇöÀúÈ÷ ³·¾Ò°í(p<0.01), Æò°¡ÇÑ 93°³ Ç׸ñ Áß °¡Àå ºÒ·®ÇÑ »óÅ·Π°ü¸®µÇ°í ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. '°Ë»ç¿ë Àåºñ ¹× ±â±¸ÀÇ °Ë±³Á¤' Ç׸ñÀº ³ó»ê¹°ÀÌ 0.4Á¡À¸·Î °ü¸®»óÅÂÀÇ °³¼±ÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, ǰ¸ñº°·Î º¼ ¶§ ³·Àº Á¡¼ö·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù(p<0.05). ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇØº¼ ¶§, ¿øÀç·áÀÇ ÀÔ°í ¹× ¹Ýǰ°ü¸®¿Í °Ë»ç°ü¸®´Â °¡Àå °ü¸®°¡ ¹ÌºñÇÑ ¿µ¿ªÀ¸·Î ±Ô¸íµÇ¾ú´Ù. ±¸ÀԵǴ ¿øÀç·áÀÇ ¾ÈÀü¼ºÀ» À§Çؼ­´Â ÀÔ°í ¹× ¹Ýǰ ±âÁØÀÌ Á¤È®ÇϰÔ
This study was conducted to analysis the chemical properties of Peunggang river and investigate the effect of irrigation sources on the growth of tomato and cucumber. The salt concentration in Peunggang river was high by $3.22{sim}3.62dS{cdot}m^{-1}s$ from March to May and lower gradually from April to February of next year, which was also lower in upper stream than in middle or low stream of Peunggang river. The growth such as plant height, fresh weight and dry weight in tomato and cucumber was better in drain water and tap water irrigation than in PR water (Peunggang river) irrigation. Mean fruit weight was highest in the tap water, and that of cucumber was no significance in the treatments. The number of setting fruit was lower in the PR water than in the treatments, and which was no significance between rain water and tap water. The yield of tomato and cucumber was found to be highest by 10,594 and 11,826 kg/10a in tap water, respectively and also lowest in the PR water among the three treatments. The fruit quality, soluble solids of tomato shows a tendency to increase in the PR water as compared with the other treatment, and the rate of blossom-end rote was higher by 13.6% in the PR water. T-N and P content of tomato and cucumber were no significance in the treatments. Ca content was lowest, but Na content highest in the PR water. It was thought that a rain water and tap water as alternative irrigation source of a PR water were proper.
 
Ű¿öµå
ºø¹°;¼öµ¾¹°;¼ö·®¿°;³óµµ;rain water;salt concentration;tap water;yield;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.16, no.4, 2007³â, pp.322-327
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200706414475623)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿