¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.4, no.1, 1995³â, pp.32-42
ºñ°¡¸²½Ã¼³ÀÇ È¿À²Àû ÇüÅ °³¹ß¿¡ °üÇÑ ±âÃÊ ¿¬±¸
( A Fundamental Study on the Development of Highly Efficient Models of Rain Shelter )
¼ÕÁ¤ÀÍ;±è¹®±â;±Ç¿µ»ï;³²»ó¿î;À±³²±Õ; °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ³ó°øÇаú;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ³ó°øÇаú;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò ½Ã¼³Àç¹è°ú;¾È¼º»ê¾÷´ëÇб³ ³óÃ̰³¹ßÇаú;¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ³ó°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
1. ½Ã¼³Çüź° ¿ÂµµºÐÆ÷´Â Type 1ÀÇ °æ¿ì ÁöºØÀÇ È¯±â±¸°¡ ¾ø±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Áß·Âȯ±â´Â °ÅÀÇ ÀϾÁö ¾Ê°í, dz·Âȯ±â¿¡¸¸ ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ°Ô µÇ¹Ç·Î dz¼ÓÀÌ ¾àÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â ¿Âµµ°¡ »ó½ÂÇÏ¿´´Ù. Type 2 ¹× Type 3´Â ÁöºØÀÇ È¯±â±¸¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© Áß·Âȯ±â°¡ ÀϾ±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ´ëü·Î ¿Âµµ ºÐÆ÷µµ ±ÕÀÏÇÑ ÆíÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2. ½Ã¼³Çüź° Æò¸é ±¤ºÐÆ÷´Â Type 1°¡ °¡Àå ³ô°í Type 2, Type 3¼øÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Áï ÀÏ»çÅõ°úÀ²¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Áö¸é ÀÏ»ç µµ´ÞÀ²°ú Á÷Á¢ÀûÀ¸·Î °ü·ÃµÇ±â ¶§¹®¿¡ Type 1, Type 2, Type 3¼øÀ¸·Î Áö¸é¿Âµµ »ó½Â¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ¾ú´Ù. 3. ȯ±â¸ðµ¨°ú ¿­¼öÁö ¸ðµ¨À» µµÀÔÇÏ¿© ȯ±â·® ¹× ½Ç³»¿Âµµ º¯È­¸¦ ±¸ÇÑ °á°ú, ½Ã¼³Çüź° dz¼ÓÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ³»¿Ü±â¿ÂÂ÷ º¯È­´Â Type 1ÀÌ °¡Àå Å©°í Type 2, Type 3¼øÀ̾ú´Ù. Type 1ÀÇ °æ¿ì ´Ù¸¥ ÇüÅ¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© dz¼ÓÀÌ 1 §½·Î Áõ°¡ÇÏ¸é ±Þ°ÝÈ÷ ³»¿Ü±â¿ÂÂ÷°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. 4. ½ÇÃøÄ¡¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ¸ðµ¨¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ç³¼Óº¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ ȯ±â·®ÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ÃßÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, Type 3 ¹× Type 2°¡ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î Type 1º¸´Ù ³·Àº °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. 5. ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î °³·®ÇüÀÎ Type 2 ¹× Type 3Àº °üÇàÇüÀÎ Type 1º¸´Ù È¿À²ÀûÀ̶ó°í ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. ƯÈ÷, ¼º·ÂÈ­ÀÇ Â÷¿ø¿¡¼­ º¸¸é Type 3ÀÌ Type 2º¸´Ù ¿ùµîÈ÷ ¿ì¼öÇϱ⠶§¹®¿¡ ÀÚ¿¬ÀûÀÎ °­¿ìÂ÷´Ü ´É·ÂÀÌ º¸ÀåµÈ´Ù¸é Type 3ÀÌ Type 2º¸´Ù È¿À²ÀûÀ̶ó°í »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
Cultivation using rain shelter is very popular in summer because rain shelter has a simple structure using less materials than any other regular greenhouse. Although it has a main advantage of easy construction in terms of labour, time and cost, it has some disadvantage of poor ventilation and rain fall inflow. Therefore, the rain shelters being able to overcome the problems, to some extent, are necessary to propagate for practical purpose. Three characteristic types of rain shelter were analyzed using measured and simulated environment data. Type 1 was a conventional type with an arched roof, and Type 2 and Type 3 were improved ones which were designed to have three arched roofs and three sawtooth like roofs with the openings for ventilation, respectively. The distribution of inside temperature measured was relatively uniform in Type 2 and 3 by the natural ventilation through the openings of the roof compared to Type 1 which had no openings. The relative light transmittance measured in Type 2 and 3 showed lower than that in Type 1, which suppressed the rise of inside temperature, For more accurate comparison, the differences between inside and outside temperatures to various wind speeds were calculated by the model. The difference in Type 1 was the greatest at lower wind speed below 1 §½, that is, the highest in inside temperature, but decreased rapidly as wind speed increased above 1 §½. Measured temperatures generally showed the same trends as calculated ones by the model. As a whole, the improved rain shelters(Type 2 and 3) showed better performance than the conventional one in ventilation as well as inside temperature.
 
Ű¿öµå
ºñ°¡¸²½Ã¼³;ȯ±âÀ²;½Ç³»¿Âµµ;±¤ºÐÆ÷;¸ðµ¨;rain shelter;ventilation rate;inside temperature;light distribution;model;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.4, no.1, 1995³â, pp.32-42
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199511922404451)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿