¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.4, no.2, 1995³â, pp.181-187
¼öµ¾¹°À» ¿ë¼ö·Î »ç¿ëÇÑ °á±¸»óÃßÀÇ ¼ö°æÀ°¹¦½Ã ¹è¾ç¾×³» $ extrm{NH}_4 extrm{H}_2 extrm{PO}_4$ ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
( Study on $ extrm{NH}_4 extrm{H}_2 extrm{PO}_4$ in Nutrient Solution using Tap Water during Hydroponic raising of Crisp Lettuce )
±èÁÖÈñ;±èÇýÁø;±è¿µ½Ä; »ó¸í´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;»ó¸í´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;»ó¸í´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ½ÇÇèÀº ¼öµ¾¹°À» ¿ë¼ö·Î »ç¿ëÇÑ °á±¸»óÃß(Lactuca sativa var. capitata)ÀÇ ¼ö°æÀ°¹¦½Ã ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ pH¿¡ ´ëÇÑ NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ Á¶»çÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ pH¸¦ ¾ÈÁ¤½Ã۱â À§ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÀÛ¹è¾ç¾×°ú Ãß°¡¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ Á¶¼ºÀ» ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© °ø±ÞÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ pH´Â Ãß°¡¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ °ø±Þ½Ã ±Þ°ÝÇÑ Ç϶ôÀ» ³ªÅ¸³½ ÈÄ¿¡ ȸ±ÍÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ pH´Â ¿Âµµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í, EC´Â ¹Ý´ë·Î °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â ÀÏÁߺ¯È­¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. 1, 2Â÷ ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ pH´Â Ãß°¡¹è¾ç¾× °ø±Þ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡ NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ 0.25me/$ell$ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ 7Á¤µµ¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ¿´À¸³ª NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ 3me/$ell$°ú 6me/$ell$ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­´Â 6.4-6.5Á¤µµ¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù. 3Â÷ ½ÇÇè¿¡¼­ NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ 0.25me/$ell$ 󸮱¸ÀÇ pH´Â 6.7¿¡¼­ 7.4 ±îÁö ¼­¼­È÷ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ 3me/$ell$°ú 6me/$ell$ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­´Â 6-6.5¿¡¼­ 5-5.5·Î °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ pH¸¦ ¾ÈÁ¤½Ã۱â À§ÇÏ¿©´Â ¹è¾ç¾×¿¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ´Â NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ÀÇ Àüü ¾çÀ» 1me/s$ell$°ú 7me/6$ell$»çÀÌ·Î ¼³Á¤Çϰųª, ³óµµ¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î 0.25 me/$ell$¿Í 3 me/$ell$ »çÀÌ·Î ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÀûÁ¤Çϸ®¶ó »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
This study was conducted to investigate the effect of NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ on pH of the nutrient solution using municipal tap water during hydroponic culture of crisp lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. capitata) seedlings. The composition of starter solution was different from that of supplementary solution. The pH in the nutrient solution was suddenly declined and recovered as the supplementary solution was supplied. The pH of nutrient solution was increased with high temperature and, on the contrary, the EC of nutrient solution was decreased. It shows that plant absorbed nutrients more than water in given solution when the temperature and light was high. After supplying supplementary solution in 1st and End experiment, pH was slowly increased to 7 in NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ 0.25me/$ell$, but maintained 6.4-6.5 in NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ 3me/$ell$ and 6me/$ell$. In 3rd experiment, pH was slowly increased from 6.7 to 7.4 in NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ 0.25me/$ell$, but decreased from 6-6.5 to 5-5.5 in NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ 3me/$ell$ and 6me/$ell$. So it is suggested that the concentration between 0.25 me/$ell$ and 3 me/$ell$ by concentration base or the amount of NH$_4$H$_2$PO$_4$ between 1me/6 $ell$ and 7me/6 $ell$ by total quantity in solution is appropriate for stabilizing pH in the nutrient solution. Also this experiment suggests that hand operated measurements must be cautious due to the change of pH and EC within a 24-hour cycle.
 
Ű¿öµå
»óÃß;¼ö°æÀç¹è;¹è¾ç¾×;´ã¾×¼ö°æ;lettuce;hydroponics;nutrient solution;deep flow culture;$ extrm{NH}_4 extrm{H}_2 extrm{PO}_4$;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.4, no.2, 1995³â, pp.181-187
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199511922404659)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿