¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.6, no.3, 1997³â, pp.190-197
Àç¹è¹æ½Ä°ú ¾ç¾×ÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ Ä«³×À̼Ç(Dianthus caryophyllus)ÀÇ »ýÀå°ú °³È­¹ÝÀÀ
( Growth and Flowering Responses of Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) as influenced by Hydroponic Systems and Nutrient Solutions )
Á¤¼øÁÖ;À̹ü¼±;°­Á¾±¸;¼­¹ü¼®; Àü³²´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;Àü³²´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;(»ç)È£³²¿Â½ÇÀÛ¹°¿¬±¸¼Ò;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¾ç¾×Àç¹è Ä«³×À̼ÇÀÇ °íǰÁú ÀýÈ­ »ý»êü°è È®¸³°ú »ý»ê±â°£ ´ÜÃàÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ÀûÁ¤ Àç¹è¹æ½Ä°ú ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ Á¾·ù¸¦ ±¸¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿©¡®ÁöÁö¡¯Ç°Á¾(Dianthus caryophyllus L.cv. Gigi)À» °ø½ÃÇÏ¿© »ýÀå°ú °³È­¹ÝÀÀÀ» Á¶»ç ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 1. PH´Â Àç¹è¹æ½Ä¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ PTG ¹è¾ç¾×¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç DFT¿¡¼­´Â »ê±â ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÌ °¡Àå ³ôÀº °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´°í NFT¿¡¼­´Â Cooper ¹è¾ç¾×¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. EC´Â pHÀÇ °æÇâ°ú´Â ¹Ý´ëµÇ´Â °á°ú·Î pH°¡ °¡Àå ³·¾Ò´ø PTG ¹è¾ç¾×¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 2. Àç¹è¹æ½Ä°ú ¾ç¾×ÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¤½ÄÈÄ 88ÀÏ ÈÄÀÇ ÃÊÀåÀº DFT Àç¹èÀÇ PTG ¹è¾ç¾×¿¡¼­ 53.0cm·Î °¡Àå ÄÇÀ¸¸ç, ±× ´ÙÀ½Àº NFT ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­ 49.3cm, NFT ¹æ½Ä¿¡¼­ Cooper ¹è¾ç¾×À» »ç¿ëÇßÀ» °æ¿ì 27.3cm·Î °¡Àå ÀÛ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 3. °æ°æÀº NFT ¹æ½ÄÀÇ PTG ¹è¾ç¾×¿¡¼­ 7.2mm·Î °¡Àå µÎ²¨¿ü°í, DFT ¹æ½ÄÀÇ ÀϺ» ¿ø½Ã±ÕÇü¹è¾ç¾×À» »ç¿ëÇßÀ» ¶§ 6.1mm·Î °¡Àå °¡´Ã°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 4. ÀýÈ­ÀÇ ¼ö·®°ú °ü°èµÇ´Â ºÐÁö¼ö´Â DFT¹æ½Ä¿¡ ÀϺ» ¿ø½Ã±ÕÇü¹è¾ç¾× 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹Àº 12.7°³·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç PTG ¹è¾ç¾×Àº DFT¿Í NFT Àç¹è¹æ½Ä ¾çÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¸ðµÎ ÁÁÀº °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. 5. °³È­¼Ò¿äÀϼö°¡ °¡Àå ªÀº °æ¿ì´Â NFT ¹æ½Ä¿¡ PTG ¹è¾ç¾×À» »ç¿ëÇÒ ¶§ 122.3ÀϷμ­ À̰ÍÀº °³È­¼Ò¿äÀϼö°¡ °¡Àå ±ä DFT ¹æ½ÄÀÇ Cooper ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ 137.5ÀϺ¸´Ù ¾à 15ÀÏ Á¤µµ ´ÜÃàµÇ¾ú´Ù. 6. Ä«³×À̼ÇÀÇ Ç°Áú°ú °ü°èµÇ´Â È­°æÀåÀÇ Å©±â´Â BFT ¹æ½Ä¿¡ PTG ¹è¾ç¾× »ç¿ë±¸¿¡¼­ 92.4cm·Î °¡Àå Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
This study was conducted to determine the optimum hydroponic system and nutrient solution for promoting the growth and flowering of hydroponically grown carnation. DFT (deep flow technique) and NFT (nutrient film technique) systems were employed and four kinds of nutrient solution, which are Cooper solution, Yamasaki solution, balanced nutrient solution by Japanese Horticultural Experiment Station and PTG solution in the Netherlands were used and compared. pH was lowest in the PTG solution compared to the other nutrient solutions used. Plant height was highest in the DFT system in the plot of PTG solution as of 53.0 cm at 88 days after transplanting, while lowest in NFT system with Cooper solution. Stem diameter was more thickened in NFT system with PTG solution as of 7.2 mm at 88 days after transplanting. Days to flowering was shortened to 122.3 days in NFT system when PTG solution was used. This results suggested a combination of NFT system with PTG solution as optimum hydroponic system and nutrient solution for cut carnation production. Further trials as to the management of nutrient solution by glowing stages should be followed.
 
Ű¿öµå
Ä«³×À̼Ç;¹Ú¸·¼øÈ¯¾ç¾×Àç¹è;´ã¾×¼ö°æ;¹è¾ç¾×;ÀýÈ­;carnation;NFT;DFT;nutrient solution;cut flower;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.6, no.3, 1997³â, pp.190-197
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199711922405456)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿