¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.6, no.4, 1997³â, pp.250-257
¿Â½ÇÀç¹è Å丶ÅäÀÇ ³óÁ÷°æ º¯È­¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ü°³½Ã±â Áø´Ü
( Diagnosis of Irrigation Time Based on Microchange of Stem Diameter in Greenhouse Tomato )
À̺¯¿ì; ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ ³óÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¿Â½ÇÀç¹è Å丶Åä¿¡¼­ °æÁ÷°æÀÇ °æ½ÃÀû º¯È­¿Í ½Ä¹°Ã¼³» ¼öºÐ, Åä¾ç¼öºÐ, Áõ»ê ¹× Àϻ緮 µî°úÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ Á¤·®ÀûÀ¸·Î ÆÄ¾ÇÇÏ¿© Å丶Åä °æÁ÷°æÀÇ monitoring¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ü°³½Ã±â Áø´Ü ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸ð»öÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ½ºÆ®·¹ÀΰÔÀÌÁö·Î Á¦ÀÛÇÑ °æÁ÷°æ ¹Ì¼Òº¯È­ ÃøÁ¤ÀåÄ¡¿Í load cellÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °¢°¢ °æÁ÷°æ º¯È­ ¹× Áö»óºÎ »ýüÁßÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ 1996³â 7¿ù 1ÀϺÎÅÍ 16ÀϱîÁö 10ºÐ °£°ÝÀ¸·Î °èÃøÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¶ÇÇÑ Åä¾ç ¼öºÐÇÔ·®, Áõ»ê, Àϻ緮 µîµµ µ¿½Ã¿¡ °üÃøÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇèÀ» ½ÃÀÛÇϱâ Àü¿¡ ÃæºÐÇÑ °ü°³¸¦ ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀÌÈÄ´Â ¿Ü°ü»óÀ¸·Î À§Á¶Áõ»óÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ª±â ½ÃÀÛÇÒ ¸Å °ü°³¸¦ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ýüÁß°ú °æÁ÷°æÀº ¸Å¿ì À¯»çÇÑ ÀϺ¯È­¸¦ º¸¿´´Âµ¥ ÇØ¶ã ¹«·ÆÀÎ ¿ÀÀü 6½Ã°æ¿¡ ÃÖ´ëÄ¡¿¡ À̸£°í ÀÌÈÄ Àϻ緮°ú Áõ»êÀÇ Áõ´ë¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ °¨¼ÒÇϱ⠽ÃÀÛÇÏ¿© Áß»êÀÌ ÃÖ´ë¿¡ À̸£´Â ½Ã°¢º¸´Ù ´Ù¼Ò ´ÊÀº ¿ÀÈÄ 3½Ã°æ¿¡ ÃÖÀú¿¡ ´ÞÇÏ¿´´Ù°¡ ÀÏ»ç ¹× Áõ»êÀÇ °¨¼Ò¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ ´Ù½Ã Áõ´ëÇÏ¿© °æÁ÷°æÀÇ º¯È­¿Í ü³»¼öºÐÇÔ·®ÀÇ º¯È­¿Í´Â ¸Å¿ì ¹ÐÁ¢ÇÑ °ü°è°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¼öºÐºÎÁ· Áõ»óÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´ø ³¯µéÀÇ ÀÏ´ç °æÁ÷°æ Áõ°¡·®(DI) ¹× »ýüÁß Áõ°¡·®(DG)Àº Àϻ緮°ú ³ôÀºÁ¤ÀÇ »ó°üÀ» º¸¿´À¸³ª ¼öºÐºÎÁ·Àå¾Ö¸¦ ¹ÞÀº ³¯µéÀº Àϻ緮¿¡ µû¸¥ À̵éÀÇ ±â´ëÄ¡º¸´Ù ÇöÀúÇÏ°Ô ³·¾Æ »ýüÁß ¹× °æÁ÷°æ Áõ´ë°¡ ¸Å¿ì µÐÈ­µÇ°Å³ª ¿ÀÈ÷·Á °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿© À̸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î °ü°³½Ã±â¸¦ Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè±â°£ Áß 7¿ù 10ÀÏÀÇ °æ¿ì ¿Ü°ü»óÀ¸·Î´Â À§Á¶Áõ»óÀÌ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª Áõ»ê·®Àº ÇöÀúÈ÷ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿© ½Ä¹°Ã¼°¡ ¼öºÐºÎÁ· »óÅ¿´´ø °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Âµ¥ ÀÌ ³¯ ÅäÁß l0cm ¹× 20cm¿¡¼­ÀÇ Åä¾ç¼öºÐ Æ÷ÅÙ¼£Àº -0.2bar ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î ÀüÀϰú Å« Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª °æÁ÷°æ ¹× »ýüÁßÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â ÇöÀúÈ÷ µÐÈ­µÇ¾î ¼öºÐ ºÎÁ·À» Àß ¹Ý¿µÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇÑÆí ³· µ¿¾ÈÀÇ »ýü Áß ÃÖ´ë°¨¼Ò·®(ML)°ú °æÁ÷°æ ÃÖ´ë¼öÃà·®(MC) ¿ª½Ã Àϻ緮°ú À¯ÀÇÇÑ Á¤ÀÇ »ó°üÀ» º¸¿© Àϻ緮 ¹× Áõ»ê·® Áõ´ë¿¡ µû¶ó ü³» ¼öºÐ ¼Õ½Ç·®ÀÌ Áõ´ëÇϰí ÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ °æÁ÷°æÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â ÇѰ踦 º¸¿´´Ù. ±×¸®°í ½Ä¹°ÀÇ ¼öºÐÀå¾Ö°¡ ½ÉÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Àϻ緮¿¡ µû¸¥ À̵éÀÇ ±â´ëÄ¡º¸´Ù ÇöÀúÇÏ°Ô ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª ¼öºÐÀå¾Ö°¡ ¹Ì¾àÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ±â´ëÄ¡¿Í ±¸º°ÇϱⰡ ¾î·Á¿ö À̵éÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î °ü°³ ½Ã±â¸¦ Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ÆÇ´ÜÇϱâ´Â ¾î·Á¿î °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ °ü°³½Ã±âÀÇ ÆÇ´Ü¿¡´Â Åä¾ç¼öºÐ, MC ¹× MLÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â °Íº¸´Ù DG ¶Ç´Â DI¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ È¿À²ÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù.
Stem diameter and shoot fresh weight of tomato grown in greenhouse were measured non-destructively at 10 minutes interval from 1 to 16 July, 1996 with displacement detector using strain gauges and with suspension-type load cell, respectively, and simultaneously were measured soil water potential, transpiration and solar radiation. Ample water was irrigated before experiment, and thereafter, irrigations were made on the next morning when visual symptoms of wilting appeared. Shoot fresh weight and stem diameter showed very similar patterns in diurnal changes which are characterized by predawn maximum and afternoon minimum and in long- term evolutions, suggesting that stem diameter shrinkage and expansion are closely related to plant water content and growth, respectively, Shoot weight and stem diameter reached minimum values a little later than the time on which transpiration showed maximum. The daily net gains of fresh weight(DG) and stem diameter(DI) showed significantly Positive correlations with solar radiation in those days on which plants were not water-stressed. However, Dl and DG on those days of water stress showed much lower values than expected from the relationships between solar radiation and them. Transpiration was much lower than the expected potential transpiration on 10 July, implying that plants were water-stressed. In this case water stress was not detected from visual symptom of wilting and/or soil water potential, but was able to be identified by the lower DI and DG than the expected. The maximum contraction of stem diameter(MC) and the maximum loss of fresh weight(ML) during daytime showed significantly positive correlations with solar radiation in those days on which plants were not water-stressed and were observed greater than expected from the relationships on severely water-stressed days. But mild water stress could not be discernable by ML and MC. It would be concluded that the daily net gains of fresh weight and/or stem diameter could be used as criteria for diagnosing the water status of tomato and for triggoring the onset of irrigation in automatic system.
 
Ű¿öµå
Å丶Åä;°æÁ÷°æ;Áö»óºÎ »ýüÁß;°ü°³;tomato;stem diameter;shoot fresh weight;irrigation;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.6, no.4, 1997³â, pp.250-257
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199711922405586)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿