¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.7, no.3, 1998³â, pp.219-225
¸Ó½ºÅ©¸á·Ð ´ã¾×Àç¹è¿¡¼­ Àû½É ¹× Âø°úÀýÀ§¿Í Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ°¡ °ú½ÇÀÇ Ç°Áú ¹× ¼ö·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effect of Pinching and Fruit Setting, and Planting Density on Fruit Quality and Yield of Muskmelon Cultured by Deep Flow Technique )
Ȳ¿¬Çö;Á¶°­Èñ;¼Û±Ù¿ì;½Å¿ø±³;Á¤º´·æ; °æ³²³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;°æ³²³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;°æ³²³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;°æ³²³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¸Ó½ºÅ©¸á·ÐÀÇ ´ã¾×Àç¹è½Ã Âø°úÀýÀ§ ¹× Àû½ÉÀýÀ§¿Í Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ¸¦ ±¸¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Âø°úÀýÀ§´Â 7~8, 11~12, ¶Ç´Â 15~16Àý, Àû½ÉÀýÀ§´Â 22 ¶Ç´Â 27Àý, Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ´Â 100cm$ imes$25cm 100cm$ imes$35cm, 100cm$ imes$45cm ¹× 100cm$ imes$55cm·Î ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °ú½ÇǰÁúÀº µ¿ÀÏÇÑ Âø°úÀýÀ§À϶§ 22Àý Àû½É±¸º¸´Ù 27Àý Àû½É±¸¿¡¼­ °úÁßÀÌ ¹«°Ì°í ´çµµ°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. µ¿ÀÏÇÑ Àû½ÉÀýÀ§À϶§ Âø°úÀýÀ§°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï °úÁßÀº ¹«°Ì°í ´çµµ´Â ³·¾Ò´Ù. 100cm$ imes$25cm ¶Ç´Â 100cm$ imes$35cm Àç½Ä±¸º¸´Ù 10cm$ imes$45cm ¶Ç´Â 100cm$ imes$55cm Àç½Ä±¸¿¡¼­ °úÁßÀÌ ´õ Å©°í ´çµµ°¡ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ÃѰú½Ç¼ö·®Àº Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ°¡ ³·¾ÆÁú¼ö·Ï Àû¾úÀ¸³ª »óǰ°úÀ²Àº ¹Ý´ë·Î ³ô¾Æ¼­ »óǰ°úÀÇ ¼ö·®Àº 100cm$ imes$45cm Àç½Ä±¸¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç 100cm$ imes$25cm, 100cm$ imes$35cm, 100cm$ imes$55cm ¼øÀ¸·Î ¸¹¾Ò´Ù.
This study was carried out to determine the optimum nodes of pinching and fruit setting in muskmelon cultured by deep flow technique. A fruit was set either at 7~8th, 11~12th, or 15~16th nodes, and main shoot was pinched either at 22nd or 27th node. Distance between rows was set the same at 100cm, while the distance between plant in the row was set at 25, 35, 45, or 55cm. In treatments with the same node of fruit setting, fruit quality was enhanced and mean fruit weight increased on 22nd node compared to 27th node. terms of fruit quality as affected by node of fruit setting, larger fruits with lower soluble solid concentrations were produced as fruits were set at higher nodes. In terms of planting density, larger fruits with higher concentrations of soluble solid were produced in the 100cm$ imes$45cm and 100cm$ imes$55cm treatments compared to 100cm$ imes$25cm or 100cm$ imes$35cm treatment. Total fruit yields decreased as the planting density decreased. However, percent marketable fruits produced was the greatest in the 100cm$ imes$45cm treatment, followed in descending order 100cm$ imes$25cm, 100cm$ imes$35cm, and 100cm$ imes$55cm treatments.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼ö°æÀç¹è;´ã¾×Àç¹è;Âø°ú;Àû½É;Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ;deep flow technique;hydroponics;fruit setting;pinching;planting density;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.7, no.3, 1998³â, pp.219-225
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199811922406156)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿