|
|
|
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.7, no.3, 1998³â, pp.226-236
|
¿ÀÀ̼öÈ®¿ë ·Îº¿°³¹ßÀ» À§ÇÑ Àç¹è¹æ½ÄÀÌ »ýÀ° ¹× ¼ö·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effects of Cultivation Method on the Growth and Yield of a Cucumber for Development of a Robotic Harvester ) |
| ¹Îº´·Î;±èÇöÅÂ;ÀÓ±âÅÃ;±è¿õ;±Ç¿µ»ï;³²À±ÀÏ;ÃÖÀç¿õ;¼º½ÃÈï;ÀÌ´ë¿ø; ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ »ý¹°±âÀü°øÇаú;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ »ý¹°±âÀü°øÇаú;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ »ý¹°±âÀü°øÇаú;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ »ý¹°±âÀü°øÇаú;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò;¿ø¿¹¿¬±¸¼Ò;°Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷±â°è°øÇаú;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ »ý¹°±âÀü°øÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸´Â ¿ÀÀ̼öÈ®±â °³¹ßÀ» À§ÇÏ¿© ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ ÀνĿ¡ ÀåÇØ°¡ µÇ´Â ÀÙÀÇ ºÎºÐÀûÀÎ Á¦°Å ¹× ±â°èȸ¦ À§ÇÑ Àç¹è¹æ½ÄÀÌ ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ »ýÀ°°ú ¼ö·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ±¸¸íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼¼°¡Áö ÇüÅÂÀÇ ÀÙÁ¦°Å ¹æ½Ä°ú µÎ°¡Áö ÇüÅÂÀÇ Á¤½Ä°£°Ý, ±×¸®°í 3°¡Áö ÇüÅÂÀÇ ÁÙ±â À¯Àιæ½ÄÀ» Á¤ÇÏ¿© ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ ÀüÀå, ¼ö·®°ú 1µî±ÞºñÀ²À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. ÀÙÁ¦°Å ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ »ýÀ°À» °üÂûÇϱâ À§Çؼ ÀüÀåÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, °üÇàÀûÀÎ Á¦°Å¹æ½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì, ÀÏÁ¤ ½ÇÇè±â°£µ¿¾È Æò±Õ 52.2cm »ýÀåÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, 2Àϸ¶´Ù ÇϺÎÀÙ Çϳª¸¦ Á¦°ÅÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Æò±Õ 51.5cm »ýÀåÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼öÈ®ÇÑ ¿ÀÀ̰¡ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì ÇϺÎÀÇ ÀÙÀ» ¸ðµÎ Á¦°ÅÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Æò±Õ 51cm°¡ »ýÀåÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸¾Æ Æò±Õ 3% À̳»ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, 24cm, 30cmÀÇ ÁÖ°£°£°Ý¿¡ µû¶ó¼´Â °¢°¢ Æò±Õ 50.8cm, 51.8cmÀÇ ¾à 2%Á¤µµ »ýÀå¿¡ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ºÎºÐÀûÀÎ ÀÙÁ¦°Å´Â ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ »ýÀå¿¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡Áö ¾Ê´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù. 2. ÆÇº°º¯¼öÀÇ ÇϳªÀÎ ¼ö·®°ú 1µî±ÞºñÀ²À» ÀÙÁ¦°Å ÇüÅ¿¡ µû¶ó ºñ±³ÇØ º¸¸é, °üÇàÀûÀÎ Á¦°Å¹æ½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì, Æò±Õ ÇÑÁÖ´ç 2.6°³/ÀÏ ¸¦ ¼öÈ®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 1µî±Þ ºñÀ²Àº 56.7%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ 2Àϸ¶´Ù ÇϺÎÀÙ Çϳª¸¦ Á¦°ÅÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Æò±Õ ÇÑÁÖ´ç 2.47°³/ÀÏÀÇ ¼öÈ®ÀÌ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, 1µî±Þ ºñÀ²Àº 53.1%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¸¶Áö¸·À¸·Î ¼öÈ®ÇÑ ¿ÀÀ̰¡ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì ÇϺÎÀÇ ÀÙÀ» ¸ðµÎ Á¦°ÅÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ÇÑÁÖ´ç Æò±Õ 2.48°³/ÀÏ ¸¦ ¼öÈ®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, 1µî±Þ ºñÀ²ÀÌ 56.3%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ¼ö·®ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾à 6%Á¤µµÀ̰í 1µî±Þ ºñÀ²µµ 10% À̳»·Î Å« ¿µÇâÀº ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù. 3. ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ ÁÖ°£°£°Ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼ö·®°ú 1µî±ÞºñÀ²À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, 24cmÀÇ °æ¿ì ÇÑÁÖ´ç 2.3°³/ÀÏÀÇ Æò±Õ¼öÈ®ÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù. 1µî±ÞºñÀ²Àº 59.8%, 30cmÀÇ °æ¿ì ÇÑÁÖ´ç Æò±Õ 2.5°³/ÀÏÀ» ¼öÈ®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, 1µî±ÞÀº 57.2%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ¼ö·®Àº 24cmÀÇ °æ¿ì°¡ ¾à°£ Àû¾úÁö¸¸ 1µî±ÞÀÇ ºñÀ²·Î ȯ»êÇϸé Å©°Ô Â÷À̰¡ ¾ø´Â °ÍÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ³ó°¡Àüü ¼ö·®À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÑ´Ù¸é 24cm°¡ À¯¸®ÇÏ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù. 4. ÁÙ±âÀ¯ÀÎ Çü½Ä¿¡ µû¶ó ¼ö·®°ú 1µî±ÞºñÀ²À» »ìÆìº¸¸é, °üÇàÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀº Æò±Õ ÇÑÁÖ´ç 2.9°³/ÀÏ, 42.8%, Á÷¸³ÈÄȾÀ¯ÀÎÀº Æò±Õ ÇÑÁÖ´ç 2.2°³/ÀÏ, 61.3%, Á÷¸³ÈÄ °¡·ÎÁÙÀ¯ÀÎÀº Æò±Õ ÇÑÁÖ´ç 2.2°³/ÀÏ, 54.1%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µû¶ó¼ ¼ö·®°ú 1µî±ÞÀ» µ¿½Ã¿¡ °í·ÁÇϸé, Å« Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾øÁö¸¸, Á÷¸³ÈÄ È¾À¯Àιæ¹ý°ú Á÷¸³ÈÄ °¡·ÎÁÙÀ¯ÀÎÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â ¿ÀÀ̰¡ Áö¸é¿¡¼ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î »óºÎ¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇϹǷΠ¿µ»óÀνİú ±â°èÈ Ãø¸é¿¡¼ À¯¸®ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
| If the lowest leaves of the cucumber were removed or training cultivable method was changed, a computer vision system could divide well the cucumber fruit from the others, and also an end-effector could reach and grip cucumber fruit and cut well its fruit stalk. Therefore, this study investigated whether removal leaves and training cultivable method of a cucumber could affect its growth and yield. They can help to be designed the vision system and the end-effector. A cucumber fruit grew by 6-l5cm long for 2 days regardless of removing leaves. Removal leaves didn't affect growth of cucumber fruit. Number of cucumber fruit was produced within 10% different values by three methods (A, B, C) of removal leaves. The first grade rate (best quality) of 4 B and C was 56.7%, 53.1%, 56.3% respectively. Consequently, proper removal leaves were better than traditional way, which does not remove a leaf, because they make cucumber plant ventilate more freely and absorb more light. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ¼öÈ®±â ·Îº¿;¿µ»óó¸®;¿£µåÀÌÆåÅÍ;Àç¹è¹æ¹ý;robotic harvester;image processing;end-effector;cultivation method; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.7, no.3, 1998³â, pp.226-236
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199811922406173)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|