¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.7, no.4, 1998³â, pp.324-329
ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ǿ¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¿¬µ¿ À¯¸®¿Â½Ç³»ÀÇ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç ¹× »ê¶õÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢ÀÇ ¿µÇâ
( Effect of roof slope on the transmissivities of direct and diffuse solar radiation in multispan glasshouse by a computer simulation )
À̼®°Ç;±è¿ëÇö; °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷Åä¸ñ°øÇаú;ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷±â°è°øÇаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
¿Â½Ç³»ÀÇ ÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²À» ÇØ¼®ÇϰíÀÚ ±è°úÀÌ(1997, 1998)°¡ °³¹ßÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ¸ðÇüÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ ¿Â½Ç³»ÀÇ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç ¹× »ê¶õÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¹³»ÀÇ ¼­¿ï, ÀüÁÖ ¹× Á¦ÁÖ Áö¿ªÀÇ 10¿¬µ¿ À¯¸®¿Â½ÇÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ ¿Â½Ç³»ÀÇ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç ¹× »ê¶õÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇÏ¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢ÀÌ 15$^{circ}$, 20$^{circ}$, 24.6$^{circ}$ ÀÏ ¶§ »ê¶õÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²Àº 61.3~61.7%·Î¼­ °ÅÀÇ ÀÏÁ¤ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, 30¡£¿Í 35¡£¿¡¼­´Â 56.8~58.6% ·Î ´Ù¼Ò ÀÛ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. µ¿°è(12¿ù Ãʼø~Àͳâ 1¿ù Çϼø). Ãá°è(2¿ù Áß¼ø~4¿ù Ãʼø) ¹× Ãß°è(9¿ù Çϼø~ll¿ù Ãʼø)¿¡ µ¿¼­µ¿ ¿¬µ¿¿Â½Ç¿¡¼­ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²Àº ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» Å©°Ô ¹ÞÀ¸³ª, Çϰè(5¿ù~8¿ù)¿¡¼­ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²Àº ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» Å©°Ô ¹ÞÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. Áï µ¿°èÀÇ °æ¿ì Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²ÀÌ 30$^{circ}$¿Í 35$^{circ}$ÀÇ ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢¿¡¼­ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª, Ãá°è¿Í Ãß°è¿¡¼­´Â 20$^{circ}$ÀÇ ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢¿¡¼­ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 20$^{circ}$ÀÇ ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢À» °®´Â ±¹³»ÀÇ µ¿¼­µ¿ ¿Â½Ç¿¡¼­ À§µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²ÀÇ Â÷À̰¡ 10¿ù~Àͳâ 2¿ù »çÀÌ¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ ½Ã±â¿¡ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²Àº À§µµ°¡ ³·Àº Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ³²ºÏµ¿ ¿Â½ÇÀÇ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀº µ¿¼­µ¿ ¿Â½Ç¿¡ ºñÇØ¼­ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÛ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª, 20$^{circ}$ÀÇ ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢¿¡¼­ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²ÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ±¹³»¿¡¼­ Á÷´ÞÀϻ縦 ¸¹ÀÌ È®º¸ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¿Â½ÇÀÇ ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢Àº 20¡£ÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. ÇÑÆí ¿¬µ¿¿Â½ÇÀÇ Á÷´ÞÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀº À§µµº¸´Ù ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢¿¡¼­ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
Effect of roof slope on the transmissivities of direct and diffuse solar radiation using a computer simulation model developed by Kim and Lee(1997) was analyzed for 10-span glasshouse located in Seoul(37$^{circ}$34' N), Chonju(35$^{circ}$49' N) and Cheju(33$^{circ}$31' N). Transmissivities of diffuse solar radiation in glasshouse with roof slopes of 15, 20, 24.6, 30 and 35 degree were calculated as 61.3, 61.6, 61.7, 56.8 and 58.6%, respectively. Transmissivities of direct solar radiation(TDSR) during the period except summer season were highly affected by the roof slope. During the winter season, TDSR in glasshouse with roof slopes of 30 and 35 degree were higher than those with other roof slopes. Also, during the period except winter season, TDSR in glasshouse with roof slope of 20 degree were higher than those with other roof slopes. Difference in TDSR with latitude was significant during the period from October to February. At this period TDSR were highly appeared at lower latitude. Effect of roof slope on TDSR in S-N greenhouse was smaller than those in E-W greenhouse. It is considered that direct solar radiation highly transmitted in the glasshouse with roof slope of 20 degree.
 
Ű¿öµå
¿Â½Ç;ÀÏ»ç Åõ°úÀ²;ÁöºØ°æ»ç°¢;ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ ½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ¸ðÇü;Greenhouse;Transmissivity of solar radiation;Roof slope;Computer simulation model;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.7, no.4, 1998³â, pp.324-329
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199811922406337)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿