¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.10, no.3, 2001³â, pp.148-154
ÆÄÀÌÇÁ °ñÁ¶¿Â½ÇÀÇ ¹Î¸»¶Ò°ú ÁÖ¸§¸»¶ÒÀÇ ÀιßÀúÇ×·Â
( The Uplift Capacity of Plane and Corrugated Piles for Pipe Frame Greenhouse )
;;; ;;;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â 1-2WÇü ÇÃ¶ó½ºÆ½ÇǺ¹ ÆÄÀÌÇÁ ¿Â½ÇÀÇ ³»Ç³¼ºÀ» Áõ´ë½Ã۱â À§ÇÏ¿© Çü»ó ¹× Á÷°æÀÌ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ ¸»¶Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ÀιßÀúÇ×·ÂÀ» °ËÅäÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú ¹Î¸»¶ÒÀÇ °æ¿ì, ÀιßÇÏÁßÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ÀιßÀúÇ×·ÂÀº Áõ°¡ÇÏÁö¸¸, ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ °æ¿ì Àιߺ¯À§°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ Á÷ÈÄÀÇ ÇÏÁߴܰ迡¼­ ±ØÇÑÀιßÀúÇ׷¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÁÖ¸§¸»¶ÒÀÇ °æ¿ì´Â Àιߺ¯À§°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡µµ ½ÇÇèÀ» Á¾·áÇÒ ¶§±îÁö ÀιßÀúÇ×·ÂÀÇ Áõ°¨ÀÌ ¹Ýº¹µÇ´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®°í ±âÃÊÀÇ Çü»ó, Á÷°æ ¹× ¸ÅÀÔ±íÀÌ¿¡ µû¶ó ±ØÇÑÀιßÀúÇ×·ÂÀº ´Ù¸£Áö¸¸, º» ½ÇÇèÀÇ °æ¿ì Á÷°æ°ú ¸ÅÀÔ±íÀÌ¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ±ØÇÑÀιßÀúÇ×·ÂÀº ÁÖ¸§¸»¶ÒÀÌ ¹Î¸»¶Òº¸´Ù ¾à 2¹è Á¤µµ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ´ÜÀ§¸éÀû´ç ±ØÇÑÀιßÀúÇ×·ÂÀº ¸ÅÀÔ±íÀ̰¡ ±í¾îÁú¼ö·Ï Áõ°¡ÇÏÁö¸¸, Á÷°æÀÌ Ä¿Áö¸é °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè ´ë»óÁö¿ªÀÇ ¼³°èdz¼Ó(26.9m.s$^{-1}$)À» °í·ÁÇϸé, ¹Î¸»¶ÒÀº ¸ÅÀÔ±íÀÌ¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ±âÃÊÀÇ ÀιßÀúÇ×·ÂÀÌ ºÎÁ·ÇÏ¿´°í, ÁÖ¸§¸»¶ÒÀÇ °æ¿ìÀº ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ½ÇÇèÁ¶°Ç¿¡¼­ ÃæºÐÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
The uplift capacity of a pile for improving the wind resistance of the 1-2 W type plastic film pipe on greenhouses was tested using the plane and corrugated piles with various shapes and diameters. First, the resistant uplift capacity was measured by using the uplift loading on plane piles. As the uplift loading on plane piles increased, the resistant uplift capacity also increased until the loading was reached to ultimate uplift capacity. After ultimate uplift capacity was appeared the uplift displacement, the uplift capacity was decreased gradually. Secondly, the resistant uplift capacity was measured by using the uplift loading on corrugated piles. After the uplift capacity was reached the uplift displacement, the uplift capacity was continually increased or decreased. In general, the ultimate uplift capacity was independent of pile shapes, pile diameter length, and embedded pipe depth. However, the ultimate uplift capacity of a corrugated pile was twice more than that of a plane pile without regard to its diameter and embedded depth. The ultimate uplift capacity per unit pile area was increasing in deeper embedded depth. However, the longer a pile diameter was, the less ultimate uplift capacity. The uplift capacity of a plane pile, used in conjunction with the design wind velocity (26.9m.s$^{-1}$ ) of the project area, was unsatisfiable without regard to diameters and embedded depths of piles, while most of corrugated piles were well appeared uplift capacity under various experimental conditions.
 
Ű¿öµå
¿Â½Ç;¸»¶ÒÀÇ ÀÎÀåÀúÇ×Çõ;¼³°èdz¼Ó;³»Ç³¼Ó;greenhouse;uplift capacity of piles;design wind velocity;windproof characteristic;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.10, no.3, 2001³â, pp.148-154
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200111920844974)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿