¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.11, no.3, 2002³â, pp.144-148
Á¦ÁÖ Áö¹æ¿¡¼­ ´ç±Ù Àç¹èǰÁ¾ÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÆò°¡
( Evaluation of Commercial Varieties of Carrot in Jeju Island )
¹Ú¿ëºÀ;±è¿ë´ö;¹®Á¤¼ö; Á¦ÁÖ´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹»ý¸í°úÇкÎ;Á¦ÁÖµµ ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;Á¦ÁÖµµ ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
±¹³»»ê ¡®ÇÏÆÄ¡¯¿Ü 4ǰÁ¾°ú ÀϺ»»ê ¡®Kaneko¿Ü 9ǰÁ¾À» 2000³â 8¿ù 2ÀÏ¿¡ ÀÏ¹Ý³ó°¡Æ÷Àå¿¡ ÆÄÁ¾ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¹³»»ê°ú ÀϺ»»ê ºñ±³ Àç¹èÇÏ¿© ÀÌ Áö¿ª¿¡ °¡Àå ÀûÇÕÇÏ°í ¿ì¼öÇÑ Ç°ÁúÀÇ ´ç±Ù ǰÁ¾À» ¼±¹ßÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½ÇÇèÀ» ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÊÀå, ¿±¼ö ¹× ¿±ÁßÀº ±¹³»»êÀÎ °æ¿ì °íÁ¤Á¾ÀÎ ¡®Áß¾Ó¡¯ÀÌ °¢°¢ 60.7 cm, 9.3¸Å, 72.9 g·Î °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´°í ±³¹èÁ¾¿¡¼­´Â ¡®ºÎ·¯¿î¡¯ÀÌ °¢°¢ 60.3 cm, 8.9¸Å, 65.42À¸·Î °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¹³»»êÁß ±Ù°æ, ±ÙÀå ¹× ±ÙÁßÀº ±³¹èÁ¾, °íÁ¤Á¾ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ¡®ºñ¹Ù¸®¡¯°¡ 52mm, 15.7cm, 275 gÀ¸·Î ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ÀϺ»»êÀÎ °æ¿ì ±³¹èÁ¾Àº ¡®Sei¡¯ÀÌ 56 mm, 14.6 cm, 319 gÀ¸·Î ¾çÈ£ÇÏ¿´°í °íÁ¤Á¾Àº ¡®Tokai¡¯°¡ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´´Ù. »óǰ¼ö·®Àº ±¹¡¤³»»ê¿¡¼­ ¡®ÇÏÆÄ¡¯(5,472 kg/10a), ÀϺ»»êÀº ¡®Kaneko¡¯(5,736 kg/10a)°¡ °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í ±× ¿ÜÀÇ Ç°Á¾µéÀº ±¹³»¿Ü»ê ¸ðµÎ ºñ½ÁÇÑ °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù ¿­±ÙÀÇ ¹ß»ýÀ²Àº ¡®ºÎ·¯¿î¡¯ÀÌ 15%Á¤µµ·Î ³ô¾Ò°í °íÁ¤Á¾ÀÎ ¡®Áß¾Ó¡¯ÀÌ 10% Á¤µµ¿´´Ù. ±â±Ù ¹ß»ýÀ²Àº ¡®Hidomi¡¯°¡ 9%·Î °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í ¡®Sei¡¯°ú ¡®Tokai¡¯¼øÀ¸·Î °¢°¢ 2%, 6%·Î ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·Î ¹Ì·ç¾î º¼ ¶§ ´ç±ÙÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä »óǰ¼ºÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â ±â±Ù°ú ¿­±ÙÀÇ ¹ß»ýÀ²Àº ±¹³»»êº¸´Ù ÀϺ»»êÀÌ ³ô¾Æ ¾ÕÀ¸·Î Àç¹è¹ýÀ» Á» ´õ °³¹ßÇÏ¸é ±¹³»»ê ǰÁ¾ÀÌ ´õ Á¦ÁÖÁö¿ªÀÇ Àç¹è¿¡ À¯¸®ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÇ¾ú´Ù.
The overall objective of this study was to determine which variety of carrot-10 Japan varieties or 6 domestic varieties- produces the optimum quality, when cultivated on Jeju Island. Plant height, leaf number and leaf weight were observed to be more superior in the purebred variety ¡®Jungang¡¯than other varieties. further studies, however, skewed the crossing variety ¡®Bureoun¡¯was superior to all others. Furthermore, when comparing root diameter, root length and root weight, the ¡®Bibary¡¯was superior in both the purebred and crossing variety, When researching Japan varieties, the crossing variety, ¡®Jung¡¯showed an increase in underground root. The purebred variety ¡®Donghae¡¯also showed an increase in underground root. Marketable yields in domestic varieties were greatest in ¡®Hapa¡¯, while in Japan varieties, ¡®Kaneko¡¯was the most productive. The percentage of root cracked was 15£¥ greater in ¡®Bureon¡¯. In the purebred variety, Jungang, the percentage was only 10£¥. The percentage of roots branched was highest in ¡®Hidomi¡¯which showed a rate of 9%, The roots branched rate was 2% for ¡®Jung¡¯and 6£¥ for¡®Donghae¡¯. Considering the percentage of roots clacked or branched, the marketability of carrots was higher in Japan varieties in comparison with domestic varieties. Therefore we conclude that, in the cropping patterns of carrots, the domestic variety has an advantage over the Japan variety.
 
Ű¿öµå
°íÁ¤Á¾;±³¹èÁ¾;±â±Ù;¿­±Ù;¿ùµ¿Çü;Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ;purebred variety;crossing variety;overwintering type;branched root;cracked root;planting density;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.11, no.3, 2002³â, pp.144-148
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200211922407302)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿