|
|
|
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.12, no.1, 2003³â, pp.12-16
|
°¡½À ¹æ½Ä¿¡ µû¸¥ °¡½ÀÀÔÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ ÀÔ°æ ¹× È°ÂøÃËÁø ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ ºÐÆ÷
( Mean Size of Droplets Ejected from Humidifier and Distributions of Relative Humidity As Affected by Different Humidifying Methods in Graft-taking Enhancement System ) |
| ¹ÚÇö¼ö;ÃÖÀ¯È;±è¿ëÇö; ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ³ó¾÷±â°è°øÇаú (Çö µ¿¾ç¹°»ê±â¾÷ÁÖ½Äȸ»ç);ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ³ó¾÷±â°è°øÇаú;ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ »ý¹°ÀÚ¿ø½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкΠ(³ó¾÷°úÇбâ¼ú¿¬±¸¼Ò);
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| Á¢¸ñ¹¦ÀÇ È°ÂøÃËÁøÀ» À§Çؼ È°ÂøÃËÁø ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ°¡ 90% ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î ±ÕÀÏÇÏ°Ô Á¶ÀýµÇ¾î¾ß Çϴ¹Ù, º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °¡½À±â¿Í Àü±ØºÀ½Ä °¡½À±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »ó´ë½Àµµ¸¦ Á¶ÀýÇÒ ¶§ °¡½À¹æ½Ä¿¡ µû¸¥ °¡½ÀÀÔÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ ÀÔ°æ°ú È°ÂøÃËÁø ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ ºÐÆ÷¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °¡½À±â¿Í Àü±ØºÀ½Ä °¡½À±â·ÎºÎÅÍ ¹ß»ýµÈ °¡½À ÀÔÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ ÀÔ°æÀº °¢°¢ 7.58$pm$0.14, 9.01$pm$0.06 $mu$m·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇÑÆí °¡½À±â ÅäÃⱸ·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ °Å¸®°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï °¡½À ÀÔÀÚÀÇ Å©±â°¡ Á¶±Ý¾¿ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥, À̰ÍÀº °¡½À±â¿¡¼ ¹ß»ýµÈ ÀÔÀÚ°¡ ÅäÃⱸ·ÎºÎÅÍ ¸Ö¾îÁú¼ö·Ï ÀÔÀÚ°¡ ¼·Î °áÇÕµÇ¾î °¡½ÀÀÔÀÚÀÇ Å©±â°¡ Á¶±Ý¾¿ Áõ°¡ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. È°ÂøÃËÁø ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ¸¦ 90%·Î ¼³Á¤ÇÑ Á¶°Ç¿¡¼ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °¡½À±â¿Í Àü±ØºÀ½Ä °¡½À±â¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ 0.4, 1.1, 1.8 m ³ôÀÌ¿¡¼ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ´Â ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì °¢°¢ 92.1$pm$5.3, 90.9$pm$5.6, 89.7$pm$6.8%, Àü±ØºÀ½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì °¢°¢ 93.4$pm$5.4, 90.7$pm$5.9, 89.3$pm$7.0%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °¡½À±â¿¡¼ ¹ß»ýµÈ °¡½À ÀÔÀÚ°¡ Àü±ØºÀ½Ä¿¡ ºñÇØ¼ ´Ù¼Ò À۱⠶§¹®¿¡ ºÎÀ¯°¡ ½±°Ô ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ® ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»¿¡¼ »ó´ë½ÀµµÀÇ °ø°£ ºÐÆ÷°¡ ±ÕÀÏÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. |
|
| The effect of humidifying methods on the mean size of droplets ejected from humidifier and distributions of relative humidity in a graft-taking enhancement system (GTES) was investigated. The mean sizes of droplets ejected from an ultrasonic humidifier and a steam humidifier with electrodes were 7.58$pm$0.14 and 9.01$pm$0.06 $mu$m, respectively. Assuming that the particles ejected from humidifiers were mutually combined with distance, the mean diameter of droplets became larger as the distance apart from the outlet of humidifiers increased. When the relative humidity in GRS was controlled at 90£¥ using the ultrasonic humidifiers, the average relative humidity at the height of 0.4, 1.1 and 1.8 m were 92.1$pm$5.3, 90.9$pm$5.6, and 89.7$pm$6.8%, respectively. However, the average relative humidity using the steam humidifier with electrodes showed 93.4 $pm$5.4, 90.7$pm$5.9, and 89.3$pm$7.0%, respectively. Therefore, it was concluded that humidification by ultrasonic humidifier would be appropriate for the uniform distribution of relative humidity in GTES. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| °¡½À±â;Á¢¸ñ¹¦;È°Âø;»ó´ë½Àµµ;Humidifier;grafted seedlings;graft-taking;relative humidity; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.12, no.1, 2003³â, pp.12-16
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200311922407563)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|