¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.12, no.1, 2003³â, pp.12-16
°¡½À ¹æ½Ä¿¡ µû¸¥ °¡½ÀÀÔÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ ÀÔ°æ ¹× È°ÂøÃËÁø ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ ºÐÆ÷
( Mean Size of Droplets Ejected from Humidifier and Distributions of Relative Humidity As Affected by Different Humidifying Methods in Graft-taking Enhancement System )
¹ÚÇö¼ö;ÃÖÀ¯È­;±è¿ëÇö; ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ³ó¾÷±â°è°øÇаú (Çö µ¿¾ç¹°»ê±â¾÷ÁÖ½Äȸ»ç);ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ³ó¾÷±â°è°øÇаú;ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ³ó°ú´ëÇÐ »ý¹°ÀÚ¿ø½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкΠ(³ó¾÷°úÇбâ¼ú¿¬±¸¼Ò);
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
Á¢¸ñ¹¦ÀÇ È°ÂøÃËÁøÀ» À§Çؼ­ È°ÂøÃËÁø ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ°¡ 90% ÀÌ»óÀ¸·Î ±ÕÀÏÇÏ°Ô Á¶ÀýµÇ¾î¾ß Çϴ¹Ù, º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °¡½À±â¿Í Àü±ØºÀ½Ä °¡½À±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »ó´ë½Àµµ¸¦ Á¶ÀýÇÒ ¶§ °¡½À¹æ½Ä¿¡ µû¸¥ °¡½ÀÀÔÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ ÀÔ°æ°ú È°ÂøÃËÁø ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ ºÐÆ÷¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °¡½À±â¿Í Àü±ØºÀ½Ä °¡½À±â·ÎºÎÅÍ ¹ß»ýµÈ °¡½À ÀÔÀÚÀÇ Æò±Õ ÀÔ°æÀº °¢°¢ 7.58$pm$0.14, 9.01$pm$0.06 $mu$m·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÇÑÆí °¡½À±â ÅäÃⱸ·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ °Å¸®°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï °¡½À ÀÔÀÚÀÇ Å©±â°¡ Á¶±Ý¾¿ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥, À̰ÍÀº °¡½À±â¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýµÈ ÀÔÀÚ°¡ ÅäÃⱸ·ÎºÎÅÍ ¸Ö¾îÁú¼ö·Ï ÀÔÀÚ°¡ ¼­·Î °áÇÕµÇ¾î °¡½ÀÀÔÀÚÀÇ Å©±â°¡ Á¶±Ý¾¿ Áõ°¡ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù. È°ÂøÃËÁø ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ¸¦ 90%·Î ¼³Á¤ÇÑ Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °¡½À±â¿Í Àü±ØºÀ½Ä °¡½À±â¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ 0.4, 1.1, 1.8 m ³ôÀÌ¿¡¼­ÀÇ »ó´ë½Àµµ´Â ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì °¢°¢ 92.1$pm$5.3, 90.9$pm$5.6, 89.7$pm$6.8%, Àü±ØºÀ½ÄÀÇ °æ¿ì °¢°¢ 93.4$pm$5.4, 90.7$pm$5.9, 89.3$pm$7.0%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °¡½À±â¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýµÈ °¡½À ÀÔÀÚ°¡ Àü±ØºÀ½Ä¿¡ ºñÇØ¼­ ´Ù¼Ò À۱⠶§¹®¿¡ ºÎÀ¯°¡ ½±°Ô ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ® ½Ã½ºÅÛ ³»¿¡¼­ »ó´ë½ÀµµÀÇ °ø°£ ºÐÆ÷°¡ ±ÕÀÏÇÏ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³­ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÈ´Ù.
The effect of humidifying methods on the mean size of droplets ejected from humidifier and distributions of relative humidity in a graft-taking enhancement system (GTES) was investigated. The mean sizes of droplets ejected from an ultrasonic humidifier and a steam humidifier with electrodes were 7.58$pm$0.14 and 9.01$pm$0.06 $mu$m, respectively. Assuming that the particles ejected from humidifiers were mutually combined with distance, the mean diameter of droplets became larger as the distance apart from the outlet of humidifiers increased. When the relative humidity in GRS was controlled at 90£¥ using the ultrasonic humidifiers, the average relative humidity at the height of 0.4, 1.1 and 1.8 m were 92.1$pm$5.3, 90.9$pm$5.6, and 89.7$pm$6.8%, respectively. However, the average relative humidity using the steam humidifier with electrodes showed 93.4 $pm$5.4, 90.7$pm$5.9, and 89.3$pm$7.0%, respectively. Therefore, it was concluded that humidification by ultrasonic humidifier would be appropriate for the uniform distribution of relative humidity in GTES.
 
Ű¿öµå
°¡½À±â;Á¢¸ñ¹¦;È°Âø;»ó´ë½Àµµ;Humidifier;grafted seedlings;graft-taking;relative humidity;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.12, no.1, 2003³â, pp.12-16
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200311922407563)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿