¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.15, no.2, 2006³â, pp.125-137
¿µ±¸Çü Å«´ÀŸ¸®¹ö¼¸ Àç¹è»çÀÇ È¯°æ¿äÀÎ ºÐ¼®
( Analysis of Environment Factors in Pleurotus eryngii Cultivation House of Permanent Frame Type Structure )
À±¿ëö;¼­¿ø¸í;ÀÌÀκ¹; °æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ Áö¿ªÈ¯°æ±â¹Ý°øÇаú(³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇבּ¸¿ø);°æ»ó´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ Áö¿ªÈ¯°æ±â¹Ý°øÇаú(³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇבּ¸¿ø);¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ³ó¾÷»ý¸í°úÇдëÇÐ Á¶°æ.Áö¿ª½Ã½ºÅÛ°øÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Å«´ÀŸ¸®¹ö¼¸ Àç¹è»çÀÇ È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÀ» ÃÖÀûÈ­ÇÏ°í ½Ã½ºÅÛ ¼³°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âÃÊÀڷḦ ¾ò±â À§ÇÏ¿© ÁøÁÖÀαٿ¡ À§Ä¡ÇÑ »÷µåÀ§Ä¡ÆÐ³ÎÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¿µ±¸Çü Àç¹è»ç 2µ¿À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 2003³â 11¿ùºÎÅÍ 2005³â 10¿ù±îÁö Àç¹è»ç ³»ºÎ¿¡¼­ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ È¯°æÀÎÀÚµéÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î °ËÅäÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇèÁö¿ªÀÇ ¿Ü±â¿ÂÀº Æò³âÀÇ °Í°ú ´ëü·Î ºñ½ÁÇÑ °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ½Ã½ºÅÛ º¯°æÀüÀÇ °æ¿ì, µ¿Àý±â¿¡´Â ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î ¼³Á¤¿Âµµº¸´Ù ³·°Ô À¯ÁöµÇ¾ú°í, ¶Ç ÃÖ»óºÎ¿Í ÃÖÇϺÎÀÇ ÃÖ´ë¿Âµµ ÆíÂ÷µµ $5.1^{circ}C$ Á¤µµ·Î »óÃþÀÌ °¡Àå ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ º¯°æ ÈÄÀÇ °æ¿ì, ³­¹æ½Ã ´ëü·Î ¼³Á¤¿Âµµ ¹üÀ§¿¡¼­ Á¶ÀýµÇ´Â °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´°í, °ø±âÁ¤Ã¼³ª ¿ÂµµÃþÀÇ ¿ªÀüÇö»óÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. »ó´ë½Àµµ´Â ½Ã½ºÅÛ º¯°æ ÈÄ, $80{sim}100%$ Á¤µµÀÇ ¹üÀ§·Î¼­ ±ÇÀå»ó´ë½Àµµ ¹üÀ§¿¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Àüü Àç¹è±â°£µ¿¾È ź»ê°¡½º ³óµµ´Â $400{sim}3,300mg{cdot}L^{-1}$ Á¤µµÀÇ ¹üÀ§¿¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Á¶µµ´Â ±ÇÀåÁ¶µµº¸´Ù Àü¹ÝÀûÀ¸·Î ³·°Ô À¯ÁöµÇ°í ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, »êµµ´Â ´ëü·Î ÀÏÁ¤ÇÏ°Ô À¯ÁöµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¼öÈ®·®Àº ÀüüÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÏÁ¤ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í, Æ÷±âÀç¹èÀÇ °æ¿ì°¡ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î µî¿ÜǰÀÌ Àû¾úÀ¸¸ç, Áõ¼ö È¿°úµµ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Àü·Â¼Òºñ·®Àº °èÀýº°·Î ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, ÇÏÀý±âº¸´Ù µ¿Àý±â¿¡ Àü·Â¼Òºñ·®ÀÌ ÇöÀúÈ÷ ¸¹Àº °ÍÀ» È®ÀÎ ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
Pleurotus eryngii is one of the most promising mushrooms produced on the domestic farms. The quality as well as quantity of Eryngii is sensitively affected by micro climate factors such as temperature, relative humidity, $CO_2$ concentration, and light intensity. To safely produce high-quality Eryngii all the yew round, it is required that the environmental factors be carefully controlled by well designed structures equipped with various facilities and control systems. At the commercial mushroom cultivation houses of permanent frame type (A, B), this study was carried out to find out reasonable range of each environmental factor and yield together with economic and safe structures influencing on the optimal productivity of Eryngii. This experiment was conducted for about two-year ken Nov. 2003 to Dec. 2005 in cultivation house. Ambient temperature during the experiment period was not predominantly different from that of a normal year. The capacity of the hot water boiler and the piping systems were not enough. Because the capacity of electric heater and air circulation were not enough, air temperatures in cultivation house before improvement of system were maintained somewhat lower than setting temperature, and maximum air temperature difference between the upper and lower growth stage during a heating time period was about 5.1. But the air temperatures after system improvement were maintained within the limits range of setting temperature without happening stagnant of air. Air temperature distribution was generally distributed uniform. Relative humidity in cultivation house before , improvement was widely ranged about $44{sim}100%$. But as the relative humidity after improvement was ranged approximately $80{sim}100%$, it was maintained within the range of relative humidity recommended. And $CO_2$ concentration was maintained about $400{sim}3,300mg{cdot}L^{-1}$ range. The illuminance in cultivation house was widely distributed in accordance with position, and it was maintained lower than the recommended illuminance range $100{sim}200lx$. The acidity of midium was some lower range than the recommend acidity range of pH $5.5{sim}6.5$. The yield was relatively ununiform. In case of bottle capacity of 1,300cc, the mushroom of the lowest grade was less than 3%. The consumption electric energy was quite different according to the cultivation season. The electric energy consumed during heating season was much more than that of cooling season.
 
Ű¿öµå
»ó´ë½Àµµ;¿Âµµ;Àü·Â¼Òºñ·®;Á¶µµ;ź»ê°¡½º;³óµµ;pH¼öÈ®·®;acidity;consumption electric energy;$CO_2$ concentration;illuminance;relativity humidity;temperature;yields;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.15, no.2, 2006³â, pp.125-137
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200625121601576)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿