¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.15, no.2, 2006³â, pp.184-189
ÇϿ콺 µ¿°£¸ÖĪÀÌ Âü¿ÜÀÇ »ýÀ° ¹× ǰÁú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effect on Growth and Quality of Oriental Melon (Cucumis melo L. var. makuwa Makino) by Interspace Mulching between Polyethylene Film House )
½Å¿ë½À;¿¬ÀϱÇ;¼­¿µÁø;µµÇÑ¿ì;ÀÌÁöÀº;¹Ú¼Òµæ;ÃÖÃæµ·; °æºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø ¼ºÁÖ°úä·ù½ÃÇèÀå;°æºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø ¼ºÁÖ°úä·ù½ÃÇèÀå;°æºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;°æºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø ¼ºÁÖ°úä·ù½ÃÇèÀå;°æºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø ¼ºÁÖ°úä·ù½ÃÇèÀå;°æºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;°æºÏ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø ¼ºÁÖ°úä·ù½ÃÇèÀå;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÇϿ콺¿Í ÇϿ콺 »çÀÌ¿¡ ºñ´Ò ¸ÖĪÀÌ Âü¿ÜÀÇ »ýÀ° ¹× ǰÁú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» °ËÅäÇÑ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. Åä¾ç¼öºÐÀº ¹«Ã³¸®±¸ÀÇ 26.0%¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Èæ»öºÎÁ÷Æ÷ ¹× Èæ»öÇʸ§ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ °¢°¢ 1.2%, 2.9%Á¤µµ Àû¾úÀ¸³ª, Áö¿ÂÀº ¹«Ã³¸®±¸ $2.4^{circ}C$¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Èæ»öºÎÁ÷Æ÷ ¹× Èæ»öÇʸ§ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ °¢°¢ $0.8^{circ}C,;1.8^{circ}C$ ´õ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¹«Ã³¸®±¸¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Èæ»öÇʸ§ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ ÃÊÀå, ¿±¼ö, ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÇÔ·®, ¿±¸éÀû ¹× ÀϺñ¾×·® µî Ãʱâ»ýÀ°ÀÌ ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °³È­µµ ºü¸£°í ¼º¼÷ ¼Ò¿äÀϼöµµ ´ÜÃàµÇ¾ú´Ù. °úÁß, ´çµµ µî °ú½ÇÀÇ Ç°Áúµµ Èæ»öÇʸ§ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´°í ¹ßÈ¿°úÀ² ¹× ±âÇü°úÀ²ÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿© »óǰ°úÀ²ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿© 10a´ç »óǰ°ú¼ö·®Àº ¹«Ã³¸®±¸ÀÇ 1,864kg¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Èæ»öÇʸ§ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ 28%Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°ÀÌ Èæ»öÇʸ§ 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ Âü¿ÜÀÇ °úÁßÀÌ ¹«°Ì°í, ´çµµ°¡ ³ô°í ¹ßÈ¿°ú ¹ß»ýÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÏ°í »óǰ¼ö·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÑ °ÍÀº ÇϿ콺 µ¿°£ ¸ÖĪÀ¸·Î ¼öºÐ À¯ÀÔÀÌ Â÷´ÜµÇ¾î Áö¿ÂÀÌ »ó½ÂÇÏ¿© »Ñ¸®ÀÇ È°ÂøÀÌ »¡¶ó »ýÀ°ÀÌ ÃËÁøµÊ¿¡ µû¶ó °ú½ÇÀÇ Ç°ÁúÀÌ Çâ»óµÈ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
Effects of interspace mulching between polyethylene film house on growth and quality of oriental melon were followed. Soil moisture in control was 26.0%. Those of black nonwoven fabrics sheet and black film were less 1.2% and 2.9% than control, respectively. Soil temperature in control plot was $2.4^{circ}$ Those of black nonwoven fabrics sheet and black film were higher $0.8^{circ}$ and $1.8^{circ}$ than control, respectively. Black film was better than control in stem length, leaf number and area, chlorophyll content, xylem exudate, first flowering and fruit riping periods. Black film was better in fruit weight and soluble solid, and lesser in fermented and malformed fruit ratios, and increased 28% in marketable fruit ratio to control, 1,864kg. This results were mainly from vinyl coverage between polyethylene film house to intercept rainfall and to increase soil temperature, which fasted growth of roots after transplanting in winter season.
 
Ű¿öµå
¹ßÈ¿°ú;PE Çʸ§;ºÎÁ÷Æ÷;»ýÀ°;¼ö·®;fermented fruit;growth;nonwoven fabrics;PE film;yield;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.15, no.2, 2006³â, pp.184-189
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200625121601916)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿