¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.13, no.1, 2004³â, pp.26-32
°í·©Áö ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ ¾ÆÄ¡½Ä À¯ÀÎÀç¹è¹ý È®¸³
( Establishment of Arch Training Method in Summer Season Cultivation of Cucumber under Rain-shelter in Highlands )
ÀÌÁ¾³²;ÀÌÀÀÈ£;±è¿ø¹è;·ù½Â¿­;¿ë¿µ·Ï; °í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷¿¬±¸¼Ò;°í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷¿¬±¸¼Ò;°í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷¿¬±¸¼Ò;°í·ÉÁö³ó¾÷¿¬±¸¼Ò;°­¸ª´ëÇб³;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ½ÃÇèÀº 7${sim}$9¿ù ¼öÈ®À» À§ÇÑ °í·©Áö ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ ºñ°¡¸² Àç¹è½Ã »ý·ÂÇü À¯Àιæ¹ýÀÎ ¾ÆÄ¡½ÄÀÇ Àç¹è¹æ¹ýÀ» °³¹ßÇϰíÀÚ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¾ÆÄ¡½ÄÀÇ À¯ÀγôÀÌ(1.5 m, 1.8 m ¹× 2.1 m), Àç½Ä°Å¸®(90${ imes}$40 cm, 90${ imes}$50 cm ¹× 90${ imes}$60 cm) ¹× Àû½ÉÀýÀ§(20Àý, 25Àý, 30Àý, 35Àý ¹× ¹«Àû½É)¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºñ°¡¸²ÇϿ콺 ³» ÁöÇ¥¸é À§ 2.1 mÀÇ ±â¿ÂÀº 37$^{circ}C$·Î ³Ê¹« ³ô¾Æ, 2.1 mrn¿¡¼­´Â ÀϼÒÇö»óÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¾ÆÄ¡½Ä À¯ÀγôÀÌ 1.8 mrn°¡ ´Ù¸¥ À¯ÀγôÀÌ¿¡ ºñÇØ Âø°úÀ²°ú »óǰÀ²ÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. »óǰ¼ö·®Àº 1.8 m¿¡¼­ÀÇ 102,691 kg ${cdot}$ $ha^{-1}$·Î 1.5 mrnÀÇ 84,790 kg ${cdot}$ $ha^{-1}$º¸´Ù 21% ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ³ë±Õº´ ¹ß»ýÀ²Àº Áõ°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. LAI´Â Àû½ÉÀýÀ§°¡ ¿Ã¶ó°¥¼ö·Ï ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ³»ºÎÅõ±¤À²Àº Àç½Ä¹Ðµµ°¡ Á¼À»¼ö·Ï °æ¿±ÀÌ ¹ÐÁýµÇ¾î ³·¾ÆÁ³´Ù. Âø°ú¼ö´Â ÁÖÁöº¸´Ù ÃøÁö°¡ ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, Àû½ÉÀýÀ§°¡ ³·À»¼ö·Ï Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. »óǰ¼ö·®Àº 90${ imes}$50 cm, 35Àý Àû½É±¸°¡ 98,311 kg ${cdot}$ $ha^{-1}$·Î 90${ imes}$40cm, 30Àý Àû½É±¸ÀÇ 93,807 kg ${cdot}$ $ha^{-1}$º¸´Ù 5% Áõ°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¿©¸§»ý»êÀ» À§ÇÑ °í·©Áö¿¡¼­ ¿ÀÀÌÀÇ ¾ÆÄ¡½ÄÀ¯ÀÎ Àç¹è½Ã À¯ÀγôÀÌ´Â 1.8 m, Àç½Ä°Å¸®´Â 90${ imes}$50 cm ¹× Àû½ÉÀýÀ§´Â 35ÀýÀÌ ÃÖ´ëÀÇ ¼ö·®À» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Àç¹è½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¾ú´Ù.
Growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) with arch training method were evaluated on several training heights, planting densities, and topping node orders. Cucumber cultivar 'Eunsung-baekdadagi' was planted on 9 June with three training heights of 1.5, 1.8, and 2.1 m, there planting densities of 90${ imes}$40, 90${ imes}$50, and 90${ imes}$60 cm, and five topping node orders of 20th, 30th, 35th, and nontopping. The plot of 2.1 m training height resulted in the higher sun-scald fruit rates due to the higher temperature above 37$^{circ}C$ in the upper space of plastic house. The plot of 1.8 m arch training height showed higher fruit setting and marketable yield rate compared to the other training heights. The maketable yield rate with 1.8 m height arch training was 102,691 kg ${cdot}$ $ha^{-1}$, 21% higher value than that of 1.5 m. Powdery mildew incidence increased with the increase of planting density. Lower LAI were shown depending on the higher topping node order. Lower light transmission ratio was shown in the higher planting density plots, might be due to the crowded stems and leaves inside those plots. Fruit setting rate was also higher in main stems rather than in lateral ones. Marketable yieÀÌ in 90${ imes}$50 cm planting distance with 35th node topping treatment was 98,311 kg ${cdot}$ $ha^{-1}$, 5% higher than that 90${ imes}$40 cm planting distance with 30th node topping treatment. Thus the 1.8 m of training height, 90${ imes}$50 cm of planting distance, and 35th node topping was evaluated for the effective cultivation condition in arch training of cucumber in highland.
 
Ű¿öµå
Cucumis sativus L.;¿±¸éÀûÁö¼ö;³ë±Õº´;Åõ±¤À²;Cucumis sativus L.;LAI;downy mildew;light transmission ratio;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.13, no.1, 2004³â, pp.26-32
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200415875836599)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿