|
|
|
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.13, no.2, 2004³â, pp.112-119
|
Àú¸é°ü¼ö ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡¼ ¹è¾ç¾× ³óµµ¿Í Arbuscular ±Õ±Ù±Õ 󸮰¡ ºÐ½Ä ¹Ì´Ï Àå¹ÌÀÇ »ýÀ° ¹× °³È¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Effects of Nutrient Solution Strength and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth and Flowering of Potted Miniature Rose in Ebb and Flow System ) |
| À̹ü¼±;ÀÌÀÎÈ£;Áö¼ºÈñ;¼Õº¸±Õ;Á¶ÀÚ¿ë;°Á¾±¸; (ÁÖ)ÆÄ·ç ȯ°æÁ¦¾î±â¼ú¿¬±¸¼Ò;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹ÇÐ;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹ÇÐ;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ³óÈÇÐ;³²µµ´ëÇÐ ¾à¿ëÀÚ¿ø¿ø¿¹°³¹ß;¼øÃµ´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| ºÐÈÀå¹ÌÀÇ »ýÀå¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¹è¾ç¾× ³óµµ¿Í AMF(Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi) Á¢Á¾ ¹× Á¢Á¾½Ã±âÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ±¸¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸¸ñÀûÀ» ´Þ¼ºÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© Àú¸é°ü¼ö(ebb and flow) ½Ã½ºÅÛ¿¡¼ ÀϺ» ¿ø¿¹½ÃÇèÀå ¹è¾ç¾×À» 6³óµµ(0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4¹è)·Î ó¸®Çϰí, AMF¸¦ ¹«Á¢Á¾, »ð¸ñ ½Ã Á¢Á¾ ¹× Á¤½Ä ½Ã Á¢Á¾ ó¸®ÇÏ¿© ½Ä¹°À» Àç¹èÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹è¾ç¾× ³óµµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁü¿¡ µû¶ó ¹èÁö ħÃâ¾×ÀÇ EC°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁ³À¸¸ç, AMF¹«Á¢Á¾ 󸮱¸¿Í »ð¸ñ ½Ã AMFÁ¢Á¾Ã³¸®±¸ÀÇ ¹èÁö ħÃâ¾× ECº¯È´Â À¯»çÇÏ¿´À¸³ª Á¤½Ä ½Ã AMFÁ¢Á¾Ã³¸®±¸ÀÇ EC´Â »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ³·¾Ò´Ù. ¹èÁö ħÃâ¾×ÀÇ pHº¯È´Â AMF¹«Á¢Á¾Ã³¸®±¸¿Í »ð¸ñ ½Ã AMFÁ¢Á¾Ã³¸®±¸°¡ ¼·Î ºñ½ÁÇÑ º¯È¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾úÀ¸³ª Á¤½Ä ½Ã AMFÁ¢Á¾Ã³¸®±¸ÀÇ °æ¿ì pHº¯È°¡ Å©Áö ¾Ê°í, ¹è¾Ó¾×³óµµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ³·¾ÆÁ³´Ù. ¹è¾ç¾×ÀÇ ³óµµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ÃÊÀå, °Ç¹°Áß°ú ¿±¸éÀûÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, AMFÁ¢Á¾Ã³¸®¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¿µ¾ç»ýÀå ¹× »ý½Ä»ýÀå(°³È´ÜÃà ¹× °³È¼ö)ÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ƯÈ÷ »ð¸ñ ½Ã AMFÁ¢Á¾Ã³¸®º¸´Ù Á¤½Ä ½Ã AMFÁ¢Á¾Ã³¸®°¡ ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÇÔ·®¿¡ À־µ Á¤½Ä ½Ã AMFÁ¢Á¾Ã³¸®±¸¿¡¼ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ¹è¾ç¾×³óµµÀÇ Áõ°¡¿¡ ÀÇÇØ N, P, K, Na ¹× MnÀÇ ¿±ÁßÇÔ·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, AMFÁ¢Á¾¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼µµ Áõ°¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, Á¤½Ä ½Ã AMFÁ¢Á¾Ã³¸®±¸°¡ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÏ¿´´Ù. |
|
| Objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of nutrient solution strength and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF, Glomus sp.) on growth and flowering of potted miniature rose (Rosa hybrids L. cv 'Scarlet'). To achieve this, plants cultured with six different strength of Japanese Horticultural Experiment Station solution (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and $4.0;{ imes};{full}$ strength) and inoculated with AMP at cutting and transplanting. Leachate EC increased as solution strength were elevated. The leachate EC were not different between non-inoculated plants and AMF treatment at cutting, but significantly decreased when plants were inoculated with AMF at transplanting. The elevated strength of nutrient solution resulted in decrease of leachate pH. When plants were inoculated AMF at transplanting, leachate pH was lower than those of non-inoculated plants and inoculated with AMF at cutting. At harvesting (93 days after transplanting), plant height, leaf width, number of branches and shoot fresh and dry weight of rose 'Scarlet' increased with elevated nutrient solution strength. AMF treatment at transplanting of potted rose 'Scarlet' showed the best results in growth such as chlorophyll content, number of flowers, and shortening the days required to flower. The content of N, P, K, and Mn in leaf tissue of potted rose increased by elevated nutrient solution strength and AMF treatment, while the tissue Na contents decreased by an AMF treatment. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ±Õ±Ù±Õ;Àú¸é°ü¼ö;Àü±âÀüµµµµ;ºÐÈÀå¹Ì;Abuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi;AMF;Glomus sp.;subirrigation;electrical conductivity;potted rose; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.13, no.2, 2004³â, pp.112-119
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200411922376002)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|