¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.14, no.1, 2005³â, pp.7-14
½Ä¹°°øÀå¿ë üÀÎ ÄÁº£À̾î½Ä ÀÛ¹° Á¶°£ Á¶ÀýÀåÄ¡ °³¹ß
( Development of a Chain Conveyor Type Row-Spacing System for Plant Factory )
ÀåÀ¯¼·;¼ÛÇö°©;±èµ¿¾ï; ³ó¾÷°øÇבּ¸¼Ò;21´ëü¿¡³ÊÁö¿¬±¸¼Ò;³ó¾÷°øÇבּ¸¼Ò;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ½Ä¹°°øÀå¿ë üÀÎÄÁº£À̾î½Ä Á¶°£Á¶ÀýÀåÄ¡¸¦ °³¹ßÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. °³¹ß ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» Àç¹èÀÛ¹°¿¡ ½ÇÁ¦·Î Àû¿ëÇϱâ À§ÇØ Æò°¡ ½ÃÇèÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè°á°ú, ½Ä¹°°øÀå¿¡¼­ ¼ö°æÀç¹èµÇ´Â ä¼ÒÀÇ ÁÖ°£À» Á¶ÀýÇÏ´Â ±â¼úÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ¿´´Ù ÀÛ¹°Á¶°£Á¶Àý´Ü°è´Â ¸ÅÁÖ ¼öÈ®ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© 4´ÜÀ¸·Î ¼³Á¤ÇÏ¿´°í, ´Ü°èº° À̼ۼӵµ´Â °¢°¢ 6.4, 9.6, 12.3, 15.8$cm{cdot}s^{-1}$À̾ú°í, Á¶°£Á¶Àý·®Àº °¢°¢ 101.6, 152.4, 203.2, 254.0mm·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. 1´Ü°è¿¡¼­ 4´Ü°è·Î ÀÛ¹°ÀÌ À̼۵Ǵ µ¿¾È ÀÛ¹°°ú Àç¹è ȨÅëÀÇ ¹«°Ô°¡ 17N¿¡¼­ 935NÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡ÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó ±¸µ¿ÃàÅä¿ÀÅ©µµ $11.7~33.3N{cdot}m$¹üÀ§¿¡¼­ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿© ÀÌ·ÐÅäÅ© °ªº¸´Ù $5.9~9.8N{cdot}m$ ´õ ¼Ò¿äµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, À̶§ÀÇ ÁøÇà ÀúÇÏÀ²Àº $1.6~2.1%$À̾ú´Ù. Àç¹èȨÅëÀÇ À̵¿¼Ò¿ä ½Ã°£ÀÇ ¼³°è °ªÀÌ 2.26ÃÊÀÌ°í ½ÇÃø°ªÀÌ 2.24ÃÊ·Î Àß ÀÏÄ¡ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Á¶°£Á¶ÀýÀåÄ¡´Â Á¶°£Á¶Àý·®ÀÌ ¼³°èµÈ °ªÀÇ $5%$À̳» ¹üÁÖ¿¡¼­ Àß Á¶ÀýµÇ°í, ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ¸·Îµµ ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³ª ½Ä¹°°øÀå¿ë Á¶°£Á¶ÀýÀåÄ¡·Î üÀÎÄÁº£À̾î½Ä Á¶°£Á¶ÀýÀåÄ¡°¡ Ȱ¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ÆÇ´ÜµÇ¾ú´Ù.
This study was conducted to develop a chain conveyor-type, row-spacing system for a plant factory. The developed system was evaluated for its practical use in growing plants. Results are intended to provide technical suggestions on the row spacing for hydroponically grown vegetables in a plant factory. The designed row-spacing system for a plant factory could be adjusted by four stages with a conveying speed range of $5.3~15.8cm{cdot}s^{-1}$ and with a row-space range of 10-25cm. The torque of driving shaft was measured with a torque range of 11.7-33.3 N$cdot$m according as a trough weight changes with a range of $17~935$ N. A measured value was $5.9~9.8;N{cdot}m$ lower than a theoretical value. Travel reduction rate was shown up $1.6~1.9%$. The conveying time of trough was shown up 2.24 seconds in case that the designed value was 2.26 seconds. The system was evaluated to be functioning effectively according to the initial design factors in the test.
 
Ű¿öµå
Á¶°£Á¶Àý;¾ç¾×Àç¹è;½Ä¹°°øÀå;¿Â½Ç;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.14, no.1, 2005³â, pp.7-14
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200532217899625)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿