¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.14, no.1, 2005³â, pp.38-45
½Ãºñ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¹«±â¿°ÀÇ Åä¾çÁýÀû°ú µþ±â »ýÀ° ¹× ¼ö·®¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
( Growth and Yield of Strawberry $(Fragaria; imes;ananassa;Duchesne)$ 'Nyoho' and Salt Accumulation in PE Film House Soil as Affected by Fertilization Program )
Á¤¼®±â;ÃÖÁ¾¸í;ÀÌ¿µº¹; ÃæÃ»³²µµ ³ó¾÷±â¼ú¿ø;¹èÀç´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Á¶°æÇкÎ;Ãæ³²´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â µþ±â ½Ã¼³Àç¹è¿¡¼­ ½Ãºñ¹æ¹ýÀÌ ÀÛ¹°ÀÇ »ýÀ°, ¹«±â¿ø¼Ò Èí¼ö ¹× Åä¾ç Áß ¹«±â¿° ÁýÀû¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ±¸¸íÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© 2³â¿¡ °ÉÃÄ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. 1Â÷ ³âµµÀÇ ½Ãºñ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ µþ±â »ýÀ°¿¡¼­ ÃÊÀå, ¿±Àå, °üºÎÁ÷°æ, ¿±º´Àå ¹× ¿±ÆøÀº ´ëÁ¶±¸¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ½Ãºñ±¸µé°£ÀÇ Åë°èÀûÀÎ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. 10a´ç ¼ö·®¿¡¼­ (D)°¡ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í, (A), ³óÃÌÁøÈïû Ãßõ½Ãºñ(B), ÀϺ»ÀÇ µµÄ¡±â½ÃÇèÀå Ãßõ½Ãºñ(C) ¹× ´ëÁ¶±¸(E)¼øÀ¸·Î ¼öÈ®·®ÀÌ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀ̾ú´Âµ¥ (D)¿Í (E) °£ÀÇ À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. 2Â÷³âµµ Á¤½Ä 80ÀÏ ÈÄ¿¡ Á¶»çÇÑ »ýÀ° ¶ÇÇÑ (E)¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ½Ãºñ±¸µé°£ÀÇ Åë°èÀûÀÎ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ÀÎÁ¤µÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. 2Â÷³âµµÀÇ ¼ö·® ¹× Æò±Õ °úÁß µîÀº 1Â÷³âµµ¿Í À¯»çÇÑ °æÇâÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. 2Â÷³âµµ Åä¾çºÐ¼®¿¡¼­ pH´Â ¸ðµÎ ¼ö¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ ¹üÀ§¿¡ Æ÷ÇԵǾúÀ¸³ª (A)¿Í (D)¿¡¼­ EC°¡ 2.36 ¹× 2.19%$dS{cdot}m^{-1}$·Î ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. (A)¿Í (D)´Â Åä¾ç $NO_{3-}N$ ³óµµ°¡ °¢°¢ 74.6 ¹× 65.%$mg{cdot}L^{-1}$, ±×¸®°í Na°¡ 3.71 ¹× 3.53$cmol+kg^{-1}$À¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¿¬±¸°á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÒ ¶§ (A) ¹× (D)´Â ¼ö·® Áõ°¡¸¦ À§ÇØ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ Çϳª Åä¾çÀÇ $NO_{3-}N$ ¹× Na ³óµµ¸¦ ³ô¿© ¿°·ùÁýÀûÀ» ½ÉÈ­½ÃŰ´Â ½Ãºñ¹æ¹ýÀÓÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
This research was conducted to determine the effect of fertilization programs on crop growth, nutrient uptake and yield of strawberry and salt accumulation in PE film house soil. To achieve these, experiments were conducted through two years with various fertilization program such as traditional fertilization(A), recommended fertilization of Rural development administration (B), Tochigi prefectural experiment station (C) and Nonsan strawberry experiment station (D), and control (E). In 1st year, statistical differences in growth characteristics were not observed among treatments except (E). Yield per 10 was the highest in (D) followed by (A), (B), (C) and (E) and there was the statistical difference between (D) and (E). In the 2nd year experiment, growth characteristics and yield showed similar trends to those of 1st year experiment. In the results of soil analysis of 2nd year, the soil pH of all treatments were in the acceptable range, while electrical conductivity of (A) and (D) were 2.36 and 2.19 %$dS{cdot}m^{-1}$, respectively. After finishing of strawberry cultivation, nitrate concentration in soil solution of (A) and (D) were 74.6 and 65.0%$mg{cdot}L^{-1}$ and Na in those were 3.71 and 3.53 $cmol+kg^{-1}$, respectively. Above results indicated that (A) and (D) were good fertilization program for strawberry cultivation, but those also resulted in accumulation of $NO_{3-}N$ and Na in PE house soil.
 
Ű¿öµå
ÃÊÀå;°üºÎÁ÷°æ;10a´ç ¼öÈ®·®;»óǰ°ú;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.14, no.1, 2005³â, pp.38-45
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200532217899907)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿