¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.19, no.3, 2010³â, pp.171-176
°¨ 'ºÎÀ¯'ÀÇ °ú½Ç ºñ´ë ¹× Âø»ö ÁõÁø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ú½Ç ¼º¼÷±â¿¡ °á°úÁöÀÇ ÀÙ Á¦°Å È¿°ú
( Effect of Leaf Removal Fruit Bearing Branch in Maturation Stage on Fruit Enlargement and Coloring of Persimmon )
±èȣö;¹èÇöÁÖ;±èÅÂÃá; ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹.¾Ö¿Ïµ¿½Ä¹°ÇкÎ;¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹.¾Ö¿Ïµ¿½Ä¹°ÇкÎ;¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹.¾Ö¿Ïµ¿½Ä¹°ÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ´Ü°¨ 'ºÎÀ¯' ǰÁ¾À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °ú½Ç ºñ´ë ¹× Âø»ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼º¼÷±â¿¡ °á°úÁöÀÇ ÀÙ Á¦°Å Á¤µµÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ±¸¸íÇϱâ À§ÇØ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÙ Á¦°Å Á¤µµ¿¡ µû¶ó °ú½Ç ÁÖº¯ÀÇ Á¶µµ´Â ÀÚ¿¬±¤ÀÇ 70.1klux¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ¹«Ã³¸®±¸¿¡¼­´Â 7.9%, 20% 󸮱¸¿¡¼­´Â 13.6%, 50% 󸮱¸¿¡¼­´Â 16.4%, ±×¸®°í 100% 󸮱¸¿¡¼­´Â 30.0% ¼öÁØÀ̾ú´Ù. °úÇÇ»ö a°ªÀº ¹«Ã³¸®±¸ ¹× 20% 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ ¼öÈ®Á÷Àü±îÁö ÀÏÁ¤ ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î ²ÙÁØÈ÷ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í, Chroma °ªÀº ¸ðµç 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Ù°¡ ó¸® 7ÁÖ ÀÌÈÄ ¶³¾îÁö´Â °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ¼öÈ®µÈ °ú½ÇÀÇ ¹«°Ô¿Í Á÷°æÀº 100% 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¡º±°í ª¾Ò´Ù. °úÇüÁö¼ö´Â ¹«Ã³¸®±¸¿Í ´Ù¸¥ 󸮱¸µé °£ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. °ú½Ç ´çµµ´Â ¹«Ã³¸®±¸º¸´Ù ´Ù¸¥ 󸮱¸µé¿¡¼­ ³·Àº °æÇâÀ¸·Î 50% 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·¾Ò´Ù. °úÇÇ»ö a°ªÀº ¹«Ã³¸®±¸ ¹× 20% 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ ³ô¾Ò°í, °úÇÇ»ö b°ª°ú Chroma °ªÀº 20% 󸮱¸¿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³·¾Ò´Ù. °úÇÇ ³» º£Å¸ Ä«·Îƾ ¹× ¶óÀÌÄÚÆæ ÇÔ·®Àº ÀÙÀÇ Á¦°Å ºñÀ²ÀÌ ³ôÀº 󸮱¸Àϼö·Ï ³·Àº °æÇâÀ̾ú°í, ÃÑ ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÇÔ·®Àº ÀÌ¿Í ¹Ý´ëÀÇ °æÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ °ú½Ç ¼º¼÷±â¿¡ °ú½Ç ÁÖº¯ ÀÙÀ» Á¦°ÅÇϴ ó¸®´Â °ú½Ç Âø»ö ÁõÁø¿¡ ´Ù¼Ò È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
To investigate the effect of leaf removal on enlargement and coloring of persimmon fruits (Diospyros kaki L. cv. 'Fuyu'), four treatments control (0%), 20%, 50%, and 100% depend on leaf removal of fruit bearing branch were applied to persimmon trees. Sunlight intensities around fruits with treatments depend on removal level, compared with natural sunlight intensity (100 percentage level), was 7.9%, 13.6%, 16.4%, and 30%, respectively. Hunter $a^*$ of the fruit with control and 20% removal treatments to harvest season increased continuously. $Chroma^*$ of the fruit since the removal treatments of leaves increased continuously in all treatments, but from seventh week that had a decreasing tendency. The fruit weight and diameter were significantly heavy and short in treatments with 100% removal level. L/D ratio of the fruits had a significant difference between control and the other treatments. Soluble solids of the fruits lowed significantly in treatment with 50% removal level. Hunter $a^*$ of the fruits was better in treatments with control and 20% removal levels, Hunter $b^*$ and $Chroma^*$ lowed significantly in treatment with 20% removal level. $eta$-Carotene and lycopene concentration of the fruits lowed in treatment with the higher of removal level, total chlorophyll contents had the opposite tendency to the pigments. All results considered, removal level of leaves around fruit on bearing branch in fruit maturation stage had effect on fruit coloring improvement.
 
Ű¿öµå
°¨;¶óÀÌÄÚÆæ;º£Å¸ Ä«·Îƾ;¼º¼÷±â;ÀÙ Á¦°Å;Âø»ö;coloring;leaves removal;lycopene;persimmon;ripening period;$eta$-carotene;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.3, 2010³â, pp.171-176
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201009654400226)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿