¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.19, no.2, 2010³â, pp.117-121
´Ü°¨ 'ºÎÀ¯'ÀÇ °ú½Ç ºñ´ë¿Í Âø»ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °á¹Ú ó¸® ¿µÇâ
( Effects of Binding Treatment of Branch on Fruit Enlargement and Coloring of 'Fuyu' Persimmon Fruits )
±èȣö;¹èÇöÁÖ;±èÅÂÃá; ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹.¾Ö¿Ïµ¿½Ä¹°ÇкÎ;¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹.¾Ö¿Ïµ¿½Ä¹°ÇкÎ;¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ ¿ø¿¹.¾Ö¿Ïµ¿½Ä¹°ÇкÎ;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
´Ü°¨ 'ºÎÀ¯'¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î °ú½Ç ºñ´ë ¹× Âø»ö ÁõÁø¿¡ À§ÇÑ °á¹Ú ó¸® ½Ã °¡Áö Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ È¿°ú¸¦ ºñ±³ÇϰíÀÚ °á°ú¸ðÁö, ºÎÁÖÁö ¹× ÁÖÁö¿¡ ö»ç¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °á¹Ú ó¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ö»ç Á¦°Å Á÷ÈÄ 6ÁÖ µ¿¾È °ú½Ç Á÷°æ°ú °úÇÇ»ö a°ªÀº ¹«Ã³¸®¿¡ ºñÇØ °á°ú¸ðÁö ¹× ÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­ ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´Áö¸¸ ºÎÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­´Â È¿°ú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. °á¹Ú ó¸® 8ÁÖ ÈÄ ¼öÈ®µÈ °ú½ÇÀ» ó¸®ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº °ú½Ç°ú ºñ±³Çϸé, °úÁßÀº ¸ðµç °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­ ´õ ¹«°Å¿ü´Âµ¥ ƯÈ÷, ÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­´Â ¿ùµîÈ÷ ¹«°Å¿ü´Ù. °ú°í´Â ÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­¸¸ ´õ ³ô¾Ò°í, °ú°æÀº °á°ú¸ðÁö ¹× ÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­ ´õ ±æ¾ú´Ù. °ú½Ç ´çµµ´Â °á°ú¸ðÁö ¹× ºÎÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­ ´Ù¼Ò ³ô°Å³ª ºñ½ÁÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­´Â ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °úÇÇ»ö a°ªÀº °á°ú¸ðÁö ¹× ÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô¾ÒÁö¸¸, ÀÌ¿Í ¹Ý´ë·Î °úÇÇ»ö b°ªÀº ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³²À¸·Î½á Chroma°ªÀº °á°ú¸ðÁö ¹× ºÎÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °úÇÇ ³» ¶óÀÌÄÚÆæ ¹× º£Å¸Ä«·Îƾ ÇÔ·®Àº ºÎÁÖÁö ¹× ÁÖÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÁö¸¸, °á°ú¸ðÁö °á¹Ú󸮿¡¼­´Â Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÃÑ ¿±·Ï¼Ò ÇÔ·®Àº ¸ðµç °á¹Ú 󸮿¡¼­ ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
To investigate effects of binding treatments of branches (FMB, fruiting mother branch; PSB, secondary scaffold branch; SSB, primary scaffold branch) on enlargement and coloring of persimmon 'Fuyu' fruits in ripening period, the branches were bound by steel wire. For eight weeks after binding treatments, Hunter $a^*$ of fruit peel in FMB and SSB binding treatments was more increased than in the others. In fruit characteristics harvested at eight weeks after the binding treatments, the fruit weight was heavier in the binding treatments than in control, the first of those was in SSB binding. The fruit height was higher in SSB binding than in the others, but the fruit diameter was longer in FMB and SSB binding treatments. Solid soluble content was higher in FMB and PSB binding treatments. $Chroma^*$ of the fruit peel was higher in FMB and PSB binding treatments as Hunter $a^*$ and $b^*$ values were higher and lower in FMB and SSB binding treatments, respectively. Lycopene and $eta$-carotene content in the fruit peel were higher significantly in PSB and SSB binding treatments, total chlorophyll content in all the binding treatments was lower than in control.
 
Ű¿öµå
°á¹Úó¸®;¶óÀÌÄÚÆæ;º£Å¸ Ä«·Îƾ;Âø»ö;binding treatment;$eta$-carotene;coloring;lycopene;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.2, 2010³â, pp.117-121
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201030853097092)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿