¶óÆæÆ®¦¢Ä«Æä¦¢ºí·Î±×¦¢´õº¸±â
¾ÆÄ«µ¥¹Ì Ȩ ¸í»çƯ°­ ´ëÇבּ¸½Ç޹æ Á¶°æ½Ç¹« µ¿¿µ»ó°­ÀÇ Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÀüÅëÁ¤¿ø ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®
ÇÐȸº° ³í¹®

Çѱ¹°Ç¼³°ü¸®ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹°ÇÃà½Ã°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹µµ·ÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹»ýÅÂÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹¼öÀÚ¿øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹½Ç³»µðÀÚÀÎÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀÚ¿ø½Ä¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÀܵðÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Á¶°æÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹Áö¹Ý°øÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹ÇÏõȣ¼öÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ý¹°ÇÐȸ
Çѱ¹È¯°æ»ýÅÂÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.19, no.2, 2010³â, pp.70-76
¼öÃâ ÆÄÇÁ¸®Ä« Àç¹è ³ó°¡ÀÇ ÁöÇϼö À̿ Ư¼º
( Ion Characteristics of the Ground Water in Hydroponic Farms of Paprika for Export )
Ãֱ⿵;¿ÀÁ¤½É;ÀÌö½Â;¹Ú¼ºÅÂ;°­Åõ¸ð·Î¿ì;À¯ÇüÁÖ;ÀÌ¿ë¹ü; ¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ¿ø¿¹Çаú;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ¿ø¿¹Çаú;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ¿ø¿¹Çаú;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ¿ø¿¹Çаú;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ¿ø¿¹Çаú;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ¿ø¿¹Çаú;¼­¿ï½Ã¸³´ëÇб³ ȯ°æ¿ø¿¹Çаú;
 
ÃÊ ·Ï
ÆÄÇÁ¸®Ä« ¼ö°æÀç¹è ³ó°¡¿¡¼­ »ç¿ëÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ÁöÇϼö ¼öÁúÀ» Á¶»çÇϱâ À§ÇØ, °­¿øµµ(27Á¡), °æ»ó³²µµ(70Á¡), Àü¶ó³²µµ(54Á¡) Áö¿ª¿¡¼­ äÃëÇÑ ÁöÇϼöÀÇ pH, EC ¹× ¹«±âÀÌ¿ÂÀÇ ³óµµ¸¦ 2008³â 11¿ùºÎÅÍ 2009³â 9¿ù±îÁö ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Æò±ÕÀûÀ¸·Î pH 7.2(6.57~7.54), Àü±âÀüµµµµ(EC) 0.31(0.05~0.49) $dS{cdot}m^{-1}$, $HCO_3$ 97.81(35.37~161.11), T-N 5.68(0.45~15.48), P 0.67(0.15~0.70), K 2.53(0.59~6.70), Ca 35.68(4.15~80.70), Mg 7.35 (1.46~14.87), Na 17.89(3.31~34.82), Fe 0.01(0~0.05), Mn 0.09(0~0.51), Zn 0.06(0~0.07), Cu 0.03(0~0.10) $mg{cdot}L^{-1}$À» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. Áö¿ª°ú ³ó°¡¿¡ µû¶ó ÁöÇϼöÀÇ pH, EC, $HCO_3$, Ca, Mg, Na À̿ Ư¼ºÀº Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ¼ö°æÀç¹è Àü¿ëºñ·á·Î ¹è¾ç¾× Á¶¼ºÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ ¹üÀ§ ºóµµÀ²Àº pH 5.0~8.0ÀÌ 92.6%, EC < 0.5$dS{cdot}m^{-1}$ ¹Ì¸¸ 89.3%, Na < 30 ¹Ì¸¸ 97.5%, Ca < 40 ¹Ì¸¸ 88.5%, Mg < 20 ¹Ì¸¸ 97.5%, $HCO_3$ < 100 ¹Ì¸¸ 69.5%, Fe < 0.05 ¹Ì¸¸ 90.1%, Mn < 0.6 ¹Ì¸¸ 99.6%, Zn < 0.5$mg{cdot}L^{-1}$ ¹Ì¸¸ 98.3% À̾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ ÃøÁ¤µÈ Àüü À̿ Ç׸ñÀÌ ´Üºñ Á¶¼º¿¡ ÀûÇÕÇÑ ¼öÁúÀº 70°³¼Ò·Î 46.3%À» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. pH´Â EC, Mg, $HCO_3$, Na, ¹× Fe À̿°ú, EC´Â T-N, K, Ca, Mg, $HCO_3$, Na, ¹× Mn°ú À¯ÀÇÇÑ »ó°üÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
To investigate the ground water quality status for paprika hydroponics for export, its pH, EC (electrical conductivity) and inorganic ion concentrations were analyzed in Gangwan-do (27 samples), Gyeonsangnam-do (77 samples) and Jeollanam-do (54 samples) from November 2008 to September 2009. The average values of several components in ground water were as follows; 7.20 (6.57~7.54) in pH, 0.31 (0.05~0.49) $dS{cdot}m^{-1}$ in EC, 97.81 (35.37~161.11) in $HCO_3$, 5.68 (0.45~15.48) in T-N, 0.67 (0.15~0.70) in P, 2.53 (0.59~6.70) in K, 35.68 (4.15~80.70) in Ca, 7.35 (1.46~14.87) in Mg, 17.89 (3.31~34.82) in Na, 0.01 (0~0.05) in Fe, 0.09 (0~0.51) in Mn, 0.06 (0~0.07) in Zn, and 0.03 (0~0.10) $mg{cdot}L^{-1}$ in Cu, respectively. The values of pH, EC, $HCO_3$, Ca, Mg and Na in ground water were different depending on areas and farms. Frequency rates were 92.6% of pH 5.0~8.0, 89.3% of EC < 0.5 $dS{cdot}m^{-1}$, 69.5% of $HCO_3$ < 100, 97.5% of Na < 30, 88.5% of Ca < 40, 97.5% of Mg < 20, 90.1% of Fe < 0.05, 99.6% of Mn < 0.6, and 98.3% of Zn < 0.5 $mg{cdot}L^{-1}$, respectively, which can be used for nutrient fertilizers in hydroponics. The percentage of suitable water quality was 46.3% as 70 sites among the all analyzed ions. The pH value showed high significance of correlations with EC, Mg, $HCO_3$, Na, and Fe. Also the EC value showed high positive significance with T-N, K, Ca, Mg, $HCO_3$, Na and Mn.
 
Ű¿öµå
¼ö°æÀç¹è;ÁöÇϼö ¼öÁú;EC;ground water quality;hydroponics;pH;
 
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.19, no.2, 2010³â, pp.70-76
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201030853097081)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î
³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø
¸ñ·Ïº¸±â
ȸ»ç¼Ò°³ ±¤°í¾È³» ÀÌ¿ë¾à°ü °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸Ãë±Þ¹æÄ§ Ã¥ÀÓÀÇ ÇѰè¿Í ¹ýÀû°íÁö À̸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò ¹«´Ü¼öÁý °ÅºÎ °í°´¼¾ÅÍ
   

ÇÏÀ§¹è³ÊÀ̵¿