|
|
|
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ / v.20, no.2, 2011³â, pp.101-108
|
°ú¼ö ¹× °¡·Î¼ö º´ÇØÃæ ¹æÁ¦¸¦ À§ÇÑ Áß¼ÒÇü »ìÆ÷±âÀÇ ¼º´É½ÇÇè ¹× ¿µ»ó󸮸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ºÐ¼®
( Performance Test and Image Processing Analysis of a Small and Medium Sized Sprayer for Pests Control for Fruit Trees and Roadside Trees ) |
| ¹Îº´·Î;ÃÖÁøÈ£;À̱ԽÂ;±è¿õ;ÀÌ´ë¿ø; ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞīƮ·Î´Ð½ºÇаú;±¹¸³¿ø¿¹Æ¯ÀÛ°úÇпø ¹è½ÃÇèÀå;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞīƮ·Î´Ð½ºÇаú;°øÁÖ´ëÇб³ »ý¹°»ê¾÷°øÇкÎ;¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ¹ÙÀÌ¿À¸ÞīƮ·Î´Ð½ºÇаú;
|
|
|
 |
|
| |
| ÃÊ ·Ï |
| º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¹æÁ¦ ÀÛ¾÷À» Çϴµ¥ ÀÖ¾î¼ °ú¼ö³ó°¡ ¹× °¡·Î¼öÀÇ º´ÇØÃæÀ» ¹æÁ¦Çϱâ À§ÇØ »ìÆ÷°Å¸®°¡ 60m±îÁö »ìÆ÷ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â »ìÆ÷±â¸¦ °³¹ßÇÏ°í ¿µ»ó󸮸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼º´É½ÇÇè ¹× ºÐ¼®À» ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. Áß¼ÒÇü »ìÆ÷±âÀÇ ¼º´ÉÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇØ »ìÆ÷±âÀÇ À̵¿°Å¸®´Â 5m °£°ÝÀ¸·Î 0~20m±îÁö 5°³ÀÇ ½ÇÇ豸¸¦ µÎ¾ú°í »ìÆ÷°Å¸®´Â 10~60m±îÁö 6°³ÀÇ ½ÇÇ豸 ÃÑ 30°³ÀÇ ½ÇÇ豸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿µ»ó ó¸®ÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. Áß¼ÒÇü »ìÆ÷±â°¡ À̵¿ÇÏ¸é¼ Èí¼öÁö¿¡ »ìÆ÷ÇÑ µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ ÀÌÄ¡È ½ÃŲ ÈÄ Æò±ÕÇÑ °æ¿ì Àü ±¸°£¿¡¼ »ìÆ÷°¡ Àß µÈ °ÍÀ» º¼ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í »ìÆ÷±â°¡ Á¤ÁöÇÏ¸é¼ »ìÆ÷·®ÀÌ ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Áß¼ÒÇü »ìÆ÷±â°¡ 0.3m/s·Î À̵¿ÇÏ¸é¼ »ìÆ÷ ÇÑ °æ¿ì 15m À̵¿ÇÑ °æ¿ì »ìÆ÷±â¿¡¼ 30m ¶³¾îÁø ¿ëÁö¿¡ ÀÌÄ¡È °ªÀÌ 121·Î °¡Àå »ìÆ÷°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̵¿°Å¸®º° ÀÌÄ¡È ºñÀ²Àº Áß¼ÒÇü »ìÆ÷±â°¡ Ãâ¹ßÇÏ¸é¼ »ìÆ÷ÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ »ìÆ÷À²ÀÌ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ÀÌÄ¡È °á°ú¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Àü±¸°£¿¡¼ ÀÏÁ¤ÇÑ ºÐÆ÷À²À» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù. ³ô°Ô ³ª¿Â ±¸°£Àº ¹æÁ¦±â°¡ Ãâ¹ßÇÑ Á¡¿¡¼´Â 20m¿¡¼ 50.23%, ¹æÁ¦±â°¡ 5mÀ̵¿ÇÑ 20m±¸°£¿¡¼ 50.21%, 10m À̵¿ÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â 30m ±¸°£¿¡¼ 51.17, 15m À̵¿ÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â 30m ±¸°£¿¡¼ 52.64%, ¹æÁ¦±â°¡ Á¤ÁöÇÏ¸é¼ »ìÆ÷ÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â 20mÀÇ ±¸°£¿¡¼ 51.84%·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À̵¿°Å¸®º° °ËÁ¤»ö ºñÀ²Àº ¹æÁ¦±â·ÎºÎÅÍ 40m±îÁöÀÇ °Å¸®±îÁö »ìÆ÷°¡ ¿øÈ°ÇÏ°Ô ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¹æÁ¦±â°¡ 15m À̵¿ÇÑ °æ¿ì 60mÀÇ ±¸°£¿¡¼ 6.79%·Î °¡Àå ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. |
|
| The small and medium sprayer has developed to spray well fruit trees and roadside trees with pesticides for pests control within 60 meters. This study was carried out to analyze and evaluate its performance using image processing. While it sprayed with pesticides on the area of 20m in width and 60m in length, it was experimented 5 places by 5m from 0 to 25m width and 6 places by 10m from 10 to 60m length. The experimental image data of each sheet on places were averaged after binarization process. According to the image data, it was sprayed on all working area. However, when sprayer moved 0.3m/s velocity, the place at 15m of width and 30m of length was sprayed more than any other sprayed area, but the place at 15m of width and 60m of length was sprayed less. |
| |
| Ű¿öµå |
| ¹æÁ¦;º´ÇØÃæ;»ìÆ÷°Å¸®;»ìÆ÷±â;¿µ»óó¸®;ÀÌÄ¡È;binarization;image processing;pests;prescription;spray distance;spryaer; |
| |
|
|
 |
|
»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸÁö / v.20, no.2, 2011³â, pp.101-108
Çѱ¹»ý¹°È¯°æÁ¶ÀýÇÐȸ
ISSN : 1229-4675
UCI : G100:I100-KOI(KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO201125247229359)
¾ð¾î : Çѱ¹¾î |
|
| ³í¹® Á¦°ø : KISTI Çѱ¹°úÇбâ¼úÁ¤º¸¿¬±¸¿ø |
|
|
|
|
|
|